Abstract:There are at least three foundational relationships between the three conscious acts of intellect, emotion, and willing. Section 2 covers the structural foundational relationship (Brentano and Husserl in his early period): all conscious acts are intentional and can be divided into objectifying (intuition and representation) and non-objectifying acts (emotion and willing). Because a non-objectifying act cannot constitute an object, things must be based on objectifying acts and the object constituted by the latter; in this sense, a non-objectifying act is rooted in an objectifying one. Section 3 explains the genetic foundational issue with consciousness (Husserl in his later period, Scheler, and Heidegger): the stream of consciousness has its earliest origins and follows a process where it gradually unfolds. The earliest origin is the intentional willing, followed by nonintentional feelings, and, finally, the representation and thinking of willing. Intentional activity taking place afterward must be based on the conscious activity that has come already. Section 4 points out that, apart from the two aforementioned kinds of foundational relationships (i.e. structural and genetic), a third foundational relationship (i.e. dynamic) can also be found between the conscious acts of intellect, emotion, and willing in the Consciousness-only school (a Buddhist tradition in the East). In a continuous activity, the foundational relationship between the three aspects of intellect, emotion, and willing always remains encased in dynamic changes, and the change of primary and secondary roles (i.e. a change in the foundational relationship) could happen at any time. From this perspective, one can explain and resolve the confrontation and conflicts between the two former foundational relationships.

Solipsistic and Symbiotic: Intersubjective Idea of Neo-phenomenology

The Entanglement of Psychologism and Logicism-To Review the Intellectual History of the Relevant Disputations between E. Husserl and W. Wundt

Neurophenomenology and Its Problems

Theodor Lipps and Edmund Husserl in the Early Phenomenological Movement: From Empathy Psychology to Einfühlung Phenomenology

On Sensus Communis between Intersubjectivity and Authentic Value

Entwinement Between Phenomenology and Psychology-Reviewing and Reexamining the Relations Between Husserl and Brentano at the Level of Thoughts

Discussion about the Triple Foundational Relationship between Intellect, Emotion, and Willing from the Perspective of the Phenomenology of Consciousness

Longitudinal-Intentionality:Time, Genesis, History——Husserl’s Understanding of their Immanent Relationship

Analysen Zur PhÄNomenologischen Reflexion Selbst Sowie Bewusstheit oder Unbewusstheit des Seinsglaubens

Phenomenology of Intersubjectivity of Literature

Intentionality: Phenomenology and Analytic Philosophy (Symposium)

"Otherness" in the Phenomenological Vision

Husserl's Fifth Meditation and the Phenomenological Sociology of Alfred Schutz

Interpreting Wittgenstein’s “Phenomenology”: A Relevant History from the End of 1960’s to the Early 21th Century

Wittgenstein, Phenomenology and Cognitive Linguistics

Introspection and First-Person Perspective

Intersubjectivity and the Project of a Phenomenology of the Social World

Wittgenstein's Reconsideration on Transcendental Problem——Also on the Relationship Between Wittgenstein's "phenomenology" and Husserl's Phenomenology

Psychoanalysis--a phenomenology of language

Pure Consciousness, Intentionality, Selflessness, and the Philosophers' Syndrome

On the Question of Subjectivity in Marx's Philosopy