Are the Α0(1710) or Α0(1817) Resonances in the <…

Zhong-Yu Wang,Yu-Wen Peng,J. I. Yi,W. C. Luo,C. W. Xiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.107.116018
2023-01-01
Abstract:The BESIII Collaboration claimed that a new ${a}_{0}(1817)$ resonance was found in the recent results of the ${D}_{s}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{K}_{S}^{0}{K}^{+}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}$ decay. For this decay process, we perform a unitary amplitude to analyze the contributions of the states ${a}_{0}(980{)}^{+}$ and ${a}_{0}(1710{)}^{+}$ with the final state interactions. Considering the Cabibbo-favored external and internal $W$-emission mechanisms at the quark level, and the contributions of the resonances ${a}_{0}(980{)}^{+}$, ${a}_{0}(1710{)}^{+}$ in the $S$ wave and ${\overline{K}}^{*}(892{)}^{0}$, ${K}^{*}(892{)}^{+}$ in the $P$ wave, the recent experimental data of the ${K}_{S}^{0}{K}^{+}$ invariant mass spectrum from the BESIII Collaboration can be described well. In our results, the states ${a}_{0}(980)$ and ${a}_{0}(1710)$ are dynamically generated from the final state interactions of $K\overline{K}$ and ${K}^{*}{\overline{K}}^{*}$, respectively, which support the molecular nature for them. Moreover, some obtained branching fractions are in agreement with the experimental measurements.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?