Abstract:Abstract We choose the Reduction Formula, PCAC and Low Energy Theory to reduce the S matrix of a OZI allowed two-body strong decay involving a light pseudoscalar, the covariant transition amplitude formula with relativistic wave functions as input is derived. After confirm this method by the decay $$D^*(2010)\rightarrow D\pi $$ D ∗ ( 2010 ) → D π , we study the newly observed $$D_{s0}(2590)^{+}$$ D s 0 ( 2590 ) + with supposing it to be the state $$D_s(2^1S_0)^+$$ D s ( 2 1 S 0 ) + , we find its decay width $$\Gamma $$ Γ is highly sensitive to the $$D_{s0}(2590)^{+}$$ D s 0 ( 2590 ) + mass, which result in the meaningless comparison of widths by different models with various input masses. Instead of width, we studied the overlap integral over the wave functions of initial and final states, here we parameterized it as X which is model-independent, and the ratio $$\Gamma /{|{\mathbf {P}_f}|^3}$$ Γ / | P f | 3 , both are almost mass independent, to give us useful information. The results show that, all the existing theoretical predictions $$X_{D_s(2S) \rightarrow D^*K}=0.25\sim 0.41$$ X D s ( 2 S ) → D ∗ K = 0.25 ∼ 0.41 and $$\Gamma /{|{\mathbf {P}_f}|^3}=0.81\sim 1.77$$ Γ / | P f | 3 = 0.81 ∼ 1.77 $$\hbox {MeV}^{-2}$$ MeV - 2 are smaller than experimental data $$0.585^{+0.015}_{-0.035}$$ 0 . 585 - 0.035 + 0.015 and $$4.54^{+0.25}_{-0.52}$$ 4 . 54 - 0.52 + 0.25 $$\hbox {MeV}^{-2}$$ MeV - 2 . Further compared with $$X^{ex}_{D^*(2010) \rightarrow D\pi }=0.540\pm 0.009$$ X D ∗ ( 2010 ) → D π ex = 0.540 ± 0.009 , the current data $$X^{ex}_{D_s(2S) \rightarrow D^*K}=0.585^{+0.015}_{-0.035}$$ X D s ( 2 S ) → D ∗ K ex = 0 . 585 - 0.035 + 0.015 is too big to be an reasonable value, so it is early to say $$D_{s0}(2590)^{+}$$ D s 0 ( 2590 ) + is the conventional $$D_s(2^1S_0)^+$$ D s ( 2 1 S 0 ) + meson.

Can the nature of a 0 ( 980 ) be tested in the D s + → π + π 0 η decay?

The a0(980) and f0(980) in the process D s + → K + K − π +

Study of D s + → K + K − π + decay

Observation of $D^{+}\to K_{S}^{0}a_{0}(980)^{+}$ in the amplitude analysis of $D^{+} \to K_{S}^{0}π^+η$

Are the or resonances in the decay?

Theoretical study of the reaction

Roles of $f_{0}(500)$ and $f_{0}(980)$ in the $D_{(s)}^{+}\rightarrowπ^{+}π^{+}π^{-}$ decays

Are the $a_{0}(1710)$ or $a_{0}(1817)$ resonances in the $D_{s}^{+} \rightarrow K_{S}^{0}K^{+}π^{0}$ decay?

$B\to K\bar K(πη)h$ decays in the presence of isovector scalar resonances $a_0(980,1450)$

The $\bar B_s^0 \to J/ψπ^0 η$ decay and the $a_0(980)-f_0(980)$ mixing

Implications of the recent measurement of pure annihilation Bs→π+π- decays in QCD factorization

The newly observed state $$D_{s0}(2590)^{+}$$

$D^+ \to K_s^0 π^+ η$ reaction and $a_0(980)^+$

, , from the molecular perspective

$a_0(1710)$-$f_0(1710)$ mixing effect in the $D_{s}^{+} \rightarrow K_S^{0} K_S^{0} π^{+}$ decay

Roles of the and in the process

Production of and in decays as and molecules

Probing D s 0 * ( 2317 ) in the decays of B to two charmed mesons

Observation of $D \to a_{0}(980)π$ in the decays $D^{0} \rightarrow π^{+}π^{-}η$ and $D^{+} \rightarrow π^{+}π^{0}η$

Tetraquark nature of the $a_0(980)$ meson in hadronic $D$ decays