Abstract:We study penguin-mediated $\bar{B}_{d(s)}\to\bar{K}^{*0}(K^{*0})\phi$ transitions, proposing a new optimised observable $L_{K^*\phi}$ from the ratio of the corresponding branching ratios of these decays, with limited hadronic uncertainties and enhanced New Physics sensitivity. It deviates by $1.48\sigma$ between its experimental value and SM determination within QCD factorisation. This can be accommodated together with significant deviations found in the $K^{(*)}\bar{K}^{(*)}$ modes in our earlier works if New Physics affects either the QCD penguin operator $Q_4$ or the chromomagnetic dipole operator $Q_{8g}$ for both $b\to d$ and $b\to s$ transitions. The allowed range for the Wilson coefficients $C_{4s,8gs}$ is narrower than $C_{4d,8gd}$ since the $b\to s$ transition channel $\bar{B}_d\to\bar{K}^{*0}\phi$ is in better agreement with the SM. However, if we add the measured $\bar{B}_{d}\to \bar{K}^{0}\phi$ branching ratio, simultaneous explanation of all experimental data for $K^{(*)}\bar{K}^{(*)}$ and $K^*(\bar{K}^{(*)})\phi$ channels in terms of New Physics in $C_{4d,s}$ or $C_{8gd,s}$ only, is not possible. They can be explained more easily if we assume New Physics in both $f=d,s$ sectors. The addition of the branching ratios of the charged modes $B^-\to K^{(*)-}\phi$ to the above mix of observables results in a reduction of the parameter space for the $(C_{4f},C_{6f})$ scenario, while discarding the $(C_{6f},C_{8gf})$ scenario completely. This is because of the discrepancy of more than 1 $\sigma$ between the experimental measurements of the branching ratios of the $\bar{B}_{d}(B^-)\to\bar{K}^0(K^-)\phi$ transitions. This provides a strong incentive for the LHCb/Belle II experiments to measure the branching ratios of $\bar{B}_{d}\to\bar{K}^{(*)0}\phi$, $\bar{B}_s\to K^{*0}\phi$ and particularly $B^-\to K^-\phi$ to confirm or dismiss the conclusions hinted at by present data.

$\bar{B}_s^0 \to D_{s1}(2460)^+ K^-, D_{s1}(2536)^+ K^-$ and the nature of the two $D_{s1}$ resonance

Production of $D^_{s0}(2317)$ and $D_{s1}(2460)$ in $B$ decays as $D^{()}K$ and $D^{(*)}_sη$ molecules

Near-threshold structures in the $D_{s}^{+}D_{s}^{-}$ mass distribution of the decay $B^{+}\rightarrow D_{s}^{+}D_{s}^{-}K^{+}$

Determination of the binding and $KD$ probability of the $D^{*}_{s0}(2317)$ from the $(\bar{D}\bar K)^-$ mass distributions in $Λ_{b}\to Λ_{c} (\bar{D}\bar K)^-$ decays

$\bar B^0 \to \bar K^{() \,0} X$, $B^- \to K^{() \, -} X$, $\bar B_s^0 \to η(η', ϕ) X$ from the $X(3872)$ molecular perspective

$X_0(2900)$ and $χ_{c0}(3930)$ in process $B^+\to D^+ D^- K^+$

Resonant contributions to three-body B ( s ) → [ D ( * ) , D ̄ ( * ) ] K + K − decays in the perturbative QCD approach

Combined analysis on nature of $X(3960)$, $χ_{c0}(3930)$, and $X_0(4140)$

The roles of the $T_{c\bar{s}0}(2900)^0$ and $D_0^*(2300)$ in the process $B^-\to D_s^+K^-π^-$

Scalar resonance contributions in the $D_{s1}(2460)^{+} \rightarrow D_{s}^{+}π^{+}π^{-}$ reaction

Searching for signals of an exotic $I=1,J^P=2^+$ state of $D^K^$ nature and the structure of the $P_c(4312)$ in the $Λ_b\to Σ_c^{++} D^- K^-$ reaction

Are the $a_{0}(1710)$ or $a_{0}(1817)$ resonances in the $D_{s}^{+} \rightarrow K_{S}^{0}K^{+}π^{0}$ decay?

$B\to K\bar K(πη)h$ decays in the presence of isovector scalar resonances $a_0(980,1450)$

Study of $D_{s1}(2460)^{+}\to D_{s}^{+}π^{+}π^{-}$ in $B\to {\bar{D}}^{(*)}D_{s}^{+}π^{+}π^{-}$ decays

Are the or resonances in the decay?

Study Of Semileptonic Decays B-S -> D-S1(2536)L(Nu)Over-Bar And B-S -> D-S2(2573)L(Nu)Over-Bar In The Cqm Model

Study of the decays of S -wave D ̄ * K * hadronic molecules: The scalar X 0 ( 2900 ) and its spin partners X ̃ J ( J = 1 , 2 )

Coupled-channel $D^\ast K^\ast -D_s^\ast ρ$ interactions and the origin of $T_{c\bar{s}0}(2900)$

Optimised observables and new physics prospects in the penguin-mediated decays $B_{d(s)}\to K^{(*)0}ϕ$

Role of D ( s ) * and their contributions in B ( s ) → D ( s ) h h ′ decays

Probing D s 0 * ( 2317 ) in the decays of B to two charmed mesons