A Huge Mass in the Upper Esophagus.
Chuncheng Wu,Qiongying Zhang,Bing Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.01.036
IF: 29.4
2017-01-01
Gastroenterology
Abstract:Question: A 56-year-old man with a history of mild dysphagia for 4 months experienced worsening of his symptoms when he caught a cold or was tired, but without nausea, vomiting, acid reflux, abdominal pain, or bloating. He had no history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or heart disease, and did not smoke or drink alcohol. Physical examination was unremarkable. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy detected a circa 2.0 × 3.0-cm hemispherical submucosal bulging mass 17.0 cm from the incisor teeth (Figure A), which was hard with a smooth surface. Forceps biopsy was not possible because it was a submucosal mass. The mass located in upper esophagus and measured about 3.5 × 2.5 × 2.0 cm according to computed tomography (Figure B). Endoscopic ultrasonography revealed the mass came from muscularis propria (Figure C). Endoscopic enucleation was performed successfully with little bleeding, which showed that the mass did not have an intact capsule and it was derived from the muscularis propria. The tumor measured 3.7 × 2.5 × 2.3 cm and it had distinct borders with an elastic hard texture (Figure D). After endoscopic treatment, the patient soon experienced mild dysphagia after a meal and gastroscopy found a stricture in the esophagus at the operative site (Figure E). The patient’s dysphagia went into remission after balloon dilatation treatment (Figure F). Two years after endoscopic treatment, the patient had no evidence of tumor recurrence or stricture of the esophagus. What is the diagnosis of this tumor? See the Gastroenterology web site (www.gastrojournal.org) for more information on submitting your favorite image to Clinical Challenges and Images in GI. Hematoxylin and eosin staining detected intertwined bundles of spindle cells with a spiral-like proliferation. Immunohistochemistry showed that the tumor was diffuse and strongly positive for S-100 protein (Figure G), and it was negative for Ki-67, desmin, CD117, and CD34. The histopathologic and immunohistochemical findings confirmed the diagnosis of benign schwannoma of the esophagus. Leiomyomas are the most common submucosal tumors in the digestive tract, whereas neurogenic tumors are rare in the gastrointestinal tract. The symptom of esophageal schwannoma was related primarily to the volume of the tumor, the location of the tumor, and its speed of growth. It is difficult to make an accurate diagnosis of esophageal schwannomas before operation because schwannomas of the gastrointestinal tract are submucosal tumors, and therefore they are usually covered by normal mucosa. They mainly involve the submucosa and muscularis propria.1Miettinen M. Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): definition, occurrence, pathology, differential diagnosis and molecular genetics.Pol J Pathol. 2003; 54: 3-24PubMed Google Scholar Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration may increase the accuracy of the preoperative diagnosis of the disease. Pathologically, schwannomas comprise bundled S-100 protein-positive spindle cells in a fibrous S-100 protein-negative background and they are negative for smooth muscle markers, such as actin, desmin, CD117, and CD34. Hematoxylin and eosin staining demonstrates the fascicular arrangement of spindle cells and the palisading of cell nuclei.2Kobayashi N. Kikuchi S. Shinmao H. et al.Benign esophageal schwannoma, report of a case.Surg Today. 2000; 30: 526-529Crossref PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar Indications for treatment are large lesions that induce symptoms or evidence of ingrowth. The usual treatment is tumor enucleation under thoracotomy or thoracoscopy. If a submucosal tumor of the esophagus has a diameter of ≤2.0 cm, removal can be accomplished endoscopically.3Melvin W.S. Wilkinson M.G. Clinical and pathologic considerations.Am Surg. 1993; 59: 293-296PubMed Google Scholar For the reported case, thoracic surgeons refused to perform surgery in the patient because the superior margin of the lesion was 17.0 cm from the incisor teeth, which was too close to the orifice of the esophagus. The patient had obvious dysphagia and was eager for treatment. Endoscopic treatment was performed in a surgical operation room and thoracic surgeons were present during the procedure. Endoscopic treatment was changed to thoracotomy over time when severe bleeding or perforation occurred, which could not be handled under endoscopy. Endoscopic treatment was successful and there was little bleeding during the overall procedure. The prognosis for patients with benign schwannomas in the gastrointestinal tract is generally excellent. In all reported cases, there was no recurrence at follow-up.