International treaties have mostly failed to produce their intended effects
Steven J. Hoffman,Prativa Baral,Susan Rogers Van Katwyk,Lathika Sritharan,Matthew Hughsam,Harkanwal Randhawa,Gigi Lin,Sophie Campbell,Brooke Campus,Maria Dantas,Neda Foroughian,Gaëlle Groux,Elliot Gunn,Gordon Guyatt,Roojin Habibi,Mina Karabit,Aneesh Karir,Krista Kruja,John N. Lavis,Olivia Lee,Binxi Li,Ranjana Nagi,Kiyuri Naicker,John-Arne Røttingen,Nicola Sahar,Archita Srivastava,Ali Tejpar,Maxwell Tran,Yu-qing Zhang,Qi Zhou,Mathieu J. P. Poirier
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122854119
2022-08-02
Abstract:There are over 250,000 international treaties that aim to foster global cooperation. But are treaties actually helpful for addressing global challenges? This systematic field-wide evidence synthesis of 224 primary studies and meta-analysis of the higher-quality 82 studies finds treaties have mostly failed to produce their intended effects. The only exceptions are treaties governing international trade and finance, which consistently produced intended effects. We also found evidence that impactful treaties achieve their effects through socialization and normative processes rather than longer-term legal processes and that enforcement mechanisms are the only modifiable treaty design choice with the potential to improve the effectiveness of treaties governing environmental, human rights, humanitarian, maritime, and security policy domains. This evidence synthesis raises doubts about the value of international treaties that neither regulate trade or finance nor contain enforcement mechanisms.
multidisciplinary sciences