Abstract:This paper proposes a novel approach to access to justice by introducing a complex multilevel model that addresses the stages of conflicts in an age of vanishing trials. It provides a nuanced understanding of various modes of access to justice that correspond with different needs of disempowered populations before they enter the legal system and as they make their long journey within it. Parties trying to resolve their disputes through the civil justice system end up nowadays drifting through an incoherent, inconsistent and opaque process generally resulting in some form of reluctant compromise. ADR processes such as mediation do not necessarily help in providing a genuine alternative throughout the legal process, in which reliable data regarding expected case disposition and outcome (on the basis of similar cases) are not made available to the parties. No systematic screening mechanism directs parties to holistic conflict resolution alternatives. The involvement of judges in promoting consensual disposition of legal cases is rare and limited in scope. Accordingly, many people who initiate lawsuits as default find themselves within an adversarial and incoherent negotiation process in the shadow of the courts. This problem is particularly true for unrepresented litigants, a growing population that seeks access to justice in contemporary court systems. It is also true for conflicts that never reach the court or any legal processing due to the barriers of cost and legal information. To address the question of access to justice in an age of vanishing trials, in light of the failure of ADR to become the prevailing paradigm for resolving conflicts and the decline of litigation, this paper develops an interdisciplinary multilevel model that draws on legal theory together with methodology from law and society scholarship. This model addresses ways for improving access to justice during each stage of the civil conflict, focusing specifically on the stage of pretrial hearings, as it is currently the main public sphere in which parties seek justice. Our findings regarding the role of judges in pretrials, based on court observations and interviews, suggest that that judges develop their own methods and perspectives to promote access to justice in an age of vanishing trials and in this paper we outline some of them. We propose to expand the horizons of access to justice by adopting our modular multilevel model embedded within a coherent Dispute System Design approach and inspired by public health perspectives on law.

Social capital and procedural formalism

Between Social Capital and Formal Governance in Farmer Cooperatives: Evidence from China

Legal Origin and Social Solidarity: The Continued Relevance of Durkheim to Comparative Institutional Analysis

PASSIVE PROCEDURAL POSITION AND THE PROBLEM OF DISHONESTY OF THE PARTIES IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS

FOREIGN EXPERIENCE IN PREVENTING PROTRACTED LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Complex Societies and the Growth of the Law

Does formalization enhance institutional effectiveness?

TO THE QUESTION OF THE PROPERTIES OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURAL FORM

Constructivism of Civil Procedure with Argumentation on Proceedings and Trials: And Advice on Revision and Promotion of Civil Procedural Law

Legal Consciousness and Cultural Capital

Social and Political Trust

Measuring Law Over Time: A Network Analytical Framework with an Application to Statutes and Regulations in the United States and Germany

Law As a Culturally Constituted Sign-System – A Space for Interpretation

Compliance with the Law in Slovenia: The Role of Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy

Legal socialisation in Brazil: examining the generalisability of the procedural justice model

Multilevel Access to Justice in a World of Vanishing Trials: A Conflict Resolution Perspective

Information and Bargaining through Agents: Experimental Evidence from Mexico’s Labour Courts

Methodology of civil law science

An Analysis of Civil Procedure Principles from the Standpoint of the System Theory

Is social capital bridging or bonding? Evidence from a field experiment with association members

Judicial Interpretation and Competition Law Enforcement: Authoritarian Legal Culture, Semantic Dissonance and Skewed Agencification in Post-Socialist Croatia