Abstract:BackgroundPurposeBreast MRI is a sensitive imaging technique to assess breast cancer but its effectiveness still remains to be improved. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI in differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions independently or jointly and to explore whether correlations exist among these parameters. Study TypePopulationRetrospective. In all, 106 patients with breast lesions (47 malignant, 59 benign). SequenceAssessmentDKI sequence with seven b values and quantitative DCE sequence on 3.0T MRI. Diffusion parameters (mean diffusivity [MD], mean diffusivity [MK], and apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC]) from DKI and DWI and perfusion parameters from DCE (K-trans, k(ep), v(e), and v(p)) were calculated by two experienced radiologists after postprocessing. Disagreement between the two observers was resolved by consensus. Statistical TestsResultsThe parameters in benign and malignant lesions were compared by Student's t-test. The diagnostic performances of DKI and quantitative DCE, either alone or in combination, were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The Spearman correlation test was used to evaluate correlations among the diffusion parameters and perfusion parameters. MK, MD, ADC, K-trans, and k(ep) values were significantly different between breast cancer and benign lesions (P < 0.05). MK from DKI demonstrated the highest AUC of 0.849, which is significantly higher than ADC derived from conventional DWI (z = 3.345, P = 0.0008). The specificity of DCE-MRI-derived parameters was improved when combining diffusion parameters, such as ADC and MK. The highest diagnostic specificity (93.2%) was obtained when k(ep) and ADC were combined. k(ep) was correlated moderately positively with MK (r = 0.516) and moderately negatively with MD (r = -0.527). K-trans was weakly positively correlated with MK with an r of 0.398 and weakly negatively correlated with MD with an r of -0.450. Data ConclusionDKI is more valuable than conventional DWI in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions. DKI exhibits promise as a quantitative technique to augment quantitative DCE-MRI. Diffusion parameters derived from DKI were statistically correlated with perfusion parameters from quantitative DCE-MRI. Level of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1358-1366.

Evaluations of the Diagnostic Performance of ZOOMit Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Conventional Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Breast Lesions

Limited role of DWI with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping in breast lesions presenting as non-mass enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

The Application of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Cervical Lymph Node Lesions

Image Quality and Whole-Lesion Histogram and Texture Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Breast MRI Based on Advanced ZOOMit and Simultaneous Multislice Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging

Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value in Differential Diagnosis of Lymph Node Lesions

Application of 3.0T-MRI DWI in evaluating the efficacy of synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer

Diffusion-weighted Imaging with Fat Suppression Using Short-Tau Inversion Recovery: Clinical Utility for Diagnosis of Breast Lesions.

Analysis of diagnostic value of DCE-MRI and DWI in breast cancer

Diagnostic value of synthetic diffusion-weighted imaging on breast magnetic resonance imaging assessment: comparison with conventional diffusion-weighted imaging

Use of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for the Differentiation of Breast Tumors

Comparative utility of MRI perfusion with MSIDR and DWIBS for the characterization of breast tumors.

Meta-analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions

Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

The Diagnostic Value of MR Diffusion Weighted Imaging, Perfusion Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Imaging in Breast Lesions

Value of Diffusion Weighted Imaging on the Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Breast Diseases

Application of quantitative evaluation of computed diffusion-weighted imaging using 3-T magnetic reso-nance imaging for breast cancer

Optimizing Image Quality with High-Resolution, Deep-Learning-Based Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Breast Cancer Patients at 1.5 T

Diagnostic Assessment by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance in Differentiation of Breast Lesions under Different Imaging Protocols

Detection and Classification of Breast Lesions With Readout-Segmented Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in a Large Chinese Cohort

Diagnostic value of ADC and rADC of diffusion weighted imaging in malignant breast lesions]

The Value of MR-DWI in Differential Diagnosis of Non-Lactating Inflammatory Breast Diseases and Non-Mass Enhanced Breast Cancer