Which is the better fourth factor in China? Reversal or turnover?

Hung-Wen Lin,Jing-Bo Huang,Kun-Ben Lin,Joyce Zhang,Shu-Heng Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101347

2020-09-01

Abstract:<p>We conduct contests between reversal factor and turnover factor in explaining excess returns and return spreads as well as negative momentum profits in the Chinese stock market. Our insights include that cross-section reversal factor is better than cross-section turnover factor when discussing excess returns. Moreover, reversal overall defeats turnover as a pricing factor in capturing return spreads from both cross-section and time-series perspectives. By contrast, regardless of turnover behaves as a time-series or cross-section factor, it generally enters insignificantly in a factor model facing return spreads, suggesting there is actually underlying notable shortcomings behind turnover factor. In short, our work implies that reversal is a more tailored pricing factor for the Chinese stock market.</p>

business, finance