Abstract:This paper adopts minutely high-frequency data of yields,volumes and open interests of the six commodities futures in three exchanges of China to probe into their intraday change patterns,and discovers the `L' pattern intraday movement of absolute yield and volume.We exert financial market microstructure theory,traders' psychology and trading mechanism to explain the different intraday phenomenon between the futures market and the stock market,which has a distinctive `U' pattern.Basing on this,by the help of Granger causality test theories and Vector Autoregressive models(VAR),we study the factors that influence the volatility of yields and the lagged orders.The results show that there are two-way Granger causality among each two of the absolute yield,volume and open interest, which is different from the empirical result of the stock market that there is a one-way Granger causality from volume to absolute yield,and the difference comes from the short mechanism of futures market.Through the decomposition of variance of VAR models and the impulse response analysis,we empirically analyze the dynamic relationship among the three factors.The conclusion shows that: when we treat the volatility of absolute yield as an explained variable,the residual disturbance can be explained about 90% by its lagged terms,and volume can explain about 10%.When volume is interpreted as an explained variable,about 80% of the residual disturbance can be explained by its lagged terms and the volatility of the absolute price explains about 20%.When open interest is considered as an explained variable,lagged terms of its own interprets about 45% to 70% of the residual disturbance,the volume explains 25%-45%,and the volatility of absolute price explains 5% to 10%.All the explanatory variables reach stable about 20-30 minutes later.Empirical result tells the weak impact from open interest to volatility of absolute yield and volume and the strong correlation between volatility of absolute yield and volume.Some investment suggestions are offered from the analysis mentioned above.

High Turnover with High Price Delay? Dissecting the Puzzling Phenomenon for China's A-shares

Does the turnover effect matter in emerging markets? Evidence from China

Price Nonsynchronicity, Idiosyncratic Risk, and Expected Stock Returns in China

Turnover Premia in China's Stock Markets

Sources of the Stock Price Fluctuations in Chinese Equity Market

Modeling Short-Term Post-Offering Price-Volume Relationships Using Bayesian Change-Point Panel Quantile Regression

On Turnover and Liquidity Analysis of China and US Stock Market

Turnovers and Stock Returns:Liquidity Premium or Speculative Bubbles?

The Impact of Stock's Return on Its Turnover and the Cause

Which is the better fourth factor in China? Reversal or turnover?

Intraday Effects Analysis of Chinese Futures Markets

Is Illiquidity Priced in the Chinese Stock Market?

Multi-market Trading, Price Delay, and Return Predictability

Profitability of return and volume-based investment strategies in China's stock market

Top Managerial Power and Stock Price Efficiency: Evidence from China

Does Investor Attention Affect Stock Trading and Returns? Evidence from Publicly Listed Firms in China

Employee Turnover and Firm Performance: Large-Sample Archival Evidence

Institutional investors' limited attention and stock price informativeness in emerging markets: Evidence from China 1

Political uncertainty and A-H share premium

On the pricing of the persistence of earnings components in China

Buy and sell dynamics following high market returns: Evidence from China