Abstract:The institutional investors function in asset pricing and corporate governance has been recognized by academics,and we can find many papers about this topic in accounting and financial journals.Comparing with individual investors,institutional investors have many advantages,such as acquiring information,transaction cost and trading size.Sias and Starks (1997) find the stock return autocorrelation is pertinent to the stock shares held by institu- tional investors,and institutional investors can rapidly react to newly arriving information, which show that institutional investors are more rational than individual investors in the cap- ital market.Using the NYSE/AMEX data during 1986-1999.Ke et al.(2005) find institu- tional investors can recognize and utilize the post-earnings announcement drift anomaly.How- ever.as an emerging market,the history of institutional investors is still very short in China. Therefore.it is very important and interesting to whether Chinese institutional investors do a better job in picking stocks. This paper studies the function of institutional investor in asset pricing.Specifically,we study whether institutional investors can recognize and use the trading volume anomaly to gain abnormal returns.Many academic studies find that the trading volume anomaly exists stably on the capital market.For instance,Lee and Swaminathan (2000) find the performance in low trading volume group is better than that in high trading volume after controlling the mo- mentum.Hong and Stein (2007) argue that trading volume on the market is due to the disa- greement among different investors,and the high trading volume goes with the high stock price,therefore they consider that trading volume has a negative correlation to subsequent stock returns. Using data during the 1999.01-2007.12 period,the result of this paper accords with our expectations.Firstly,we find that the trading volume anomaly exists on Chinese stock market,which is same to the results of Zhang et al.(2006).If investors arbitrage on the ba- sis of stock's turnover in the past three months one can get 3.3%(three-month) and 3.9% (six-month) equal weighted abnormal return.Secondly,using a sample of middle and annual institutional investors (investment funds) data,we find that the change of shareholding by in- stitutional investors is influenced by the past trading volume in regression analysis.Thirdly, on the basis of information of the past trading volume and the share of the institutional inves- tor,we find investors can obtain 10.3% every three months abnormal return if they long the group of lowest turnover in the past three month and highest share proportion of institutional investors at the same time they short sale the group of highest turnover and lowest share pro- portion of institution investor. Our research shows then,institutional investors have active effects in recognizing and u- sing mispricing in Chinese stock market.Our research provides new evidence to understand the behavior of institutional investors and market efficiency.

Investor Divergence,Abnormal Trading Volume and Cross-sectional Stock Returns:Evidence from Chinese Stock Market

Price Nonsynchronicity, Idiosyncratic Risk, and Expected Stock Returns in China

Asymmetry of return distribution, abnormality of intradaily risk based on quantile regression model with high-frequency data from Shanghai stock market

Trading volume, anomaly returns and noise trader risk in China

Volume and stock returns in the Chinese market

Profitability of return and volume-based investment strategies in China's stock market

Short-Term Price Contrarian and Volume Effect in China's Stock Market

The Behavior of Institutional Investors and Trading Volume Anomaly

Investigation in Relation between Volatility and Trade Volume of China's Stock Market

Institutional trading in volatile markets: Evidence from Chinese stock markets

The reverse volatility asymmetry in Chinese financial market

The relationship between volatility and trading volume in the Chinese stock market: A volatility decomposition perspective

Costly and Unprofitable Speculation: Evidence from Trend-Chasing Chinese Short-Sellers and Margin-Traders

Research on the Relations of the Information Flow, Return Volatility and Trade Volume in Chinese Stock Market

Salience theory in price and trading volume: Evidence from China

Speculative Trading and Stock Returns*

Analyzing the Efficacy of the Relative Strength Indicator of Capital Inflows and Outflows Based on Big Data Analysis in Achieving Abnormal Returns Evidence from the Chinese Stock Market

Stock Returns And Trading Volume In Chinese Stock Market

Time-Varying Risk Spillovers in Chinese Stock Market - New Evidence from High-Frequency Data

Informed Trading Volume and Asset Prices: the Role for Aggressive Investors

Does Investor Attention Affect Stock Trading and Returns? Evidence from Publicly Listed Firms in China