Abstract:This paper adopts minutely high-frequency data of yields,volumes and open interests of the six commodities futures in three exchanges of China to probe into their intraday change patterns,and discovers the `L' pattern intraday movement of absolute yield and volume.We exert financial market microstructure theory,traders' psychology and trading mechanism to explain the different intraday phenomenon between the futures market and the stock market,which has a distinctive `U' pattern.Basing on this,by the help of Granger causality test theories and Vector Autoregressive models(VAR),we study the factors that influence the volatility of yields and the lagged orders.The results show that there are two-way Granger causality among each two of the absolute yield,volume and open interest, which is different from the empirical result of the stock market that there is a one-way Granger causality from volume to absolute yield,and the difference comes from the short mechanism of futures market.Through the decomposition of variance of VAR models and the impulse response analysis,we empirically analyze the dynamic relationship among the three factors.The conclusion shows that: when we treat the volatility of absolute yield as an explained variable,the residual disturbance can be explained about 90% by its lagged terms,and volume can explain about 10%.When volume is interpreted as an explained variable,about 80% of the residual disturbance can be explained by its lagged terms and the volatility of the absolute price explains about 20%.When open interest is considered as an explained variable,lagged terms of its own interprets about 45% to 70% of the residual disturbance,the volume explains 25%-45%,and the volatility of absolute price explains 5% to 10%.All the explanatory variables reach stable about 20-30 minutes later.Empirical result tells the weak impact from open interest to volatility of absolute yield and volume and the strong correlation between volatility of absolute yield and volume.Some investment suggestions are offered from the analysis mentioned above.

Stock Returns And Trading Volume In Chinese Stock Market

Relativity Between China Stock Market and its Economic Growth Based on VAR

Manipulation, Stock Price Volatility And Trading Volume In Chinese Stock Markets: An Empirical Evidence

Volume and stock returns in the Chinese market

Improved Accuracy Stock Price Change Prediction Model Using Trading Volume

Chinese Stock Market Volatility and the Role of U.S. Economic Variables

An empirical study on the relationship between price changes and trading volume in China stock market

Sources of the Stock Price Fluctuations in Chinese Equity Market

Profitability of return and volume-based investment strategies in China's stock market

The Price-Volume Relationship in China's Commodity Futures Markets

The dynamic relationship between stock returns and trading volume: Domestic and cross-country evidence

An Empirical Study of Dynamic Relationship between Volume and Price in China's Stock Market

Intraday Effects Analysis of Chinese Futures Markets

The relationship between volatility and trading volume in the Chinese stock market: A volatility decomposition perspective

Investigation in Relation between Volatility and Trade Volume of China's Stock Market

Research on the Relations of the Information Flow, Return Volatility and Trade Volume in Chinese Stock Market

Research on relationships between volatility and returns, trading volume, open interest in Chinese futures market

Study of Dynamic Relationship Between Volatility and Trading Volume of Chinese Stock Market——Based on Quantile Regression

Study of the fluctuating relationship between price and trading volume in Shanghai housing market using VECM model

Bivariate Causality Between Rmb Exchange Rate And Stock Price In China

Speculative Trading and Stock Returns*