Abstract:This paper adopts minutely high-frequency data of yields,volumes and open interests of the six commodities futures in three exchanges of China to probe into their intraday change patterns,and discovers the `L' pattern intraday movement of absolute yield and volume.We exert financial market microstructure theory,traders' psychology and trading mechanism to explain the different intraday phenomenon between the futures market and the stock market,which has a distinctive `U' pattern.Basing on this,by the help of Granger causality test theories and Vector Autoregressive models(VAR),we study the factors that influence the volatility of yields and the lagged orders.The results show that there are two-way Granger causality among each two of the absolute yield,volume and open interest, which is different from the empirical result of the stock market that there is a one-way Granger causality from volume to absolute yield,and the difference comes from the short mechanism of futures market.Through the decomposition of variance of VAR models and the impulse response analysis,we empirically analyze the dynamic relationship among the three factors.The conclusion shows that: when we treat the volatility of absolute yield as an explained variable,the residual disturbance can be explained about 90% by its lagged terms,and volume can explain about 10%.When volume is interpreted as an explained variable,about 80% of the residual disturbance can be explained by its lagged terms and the volatility of the absolute price explains about 20%.When open interest is considered as an explained variable,lagged terms of its own interprets about 45% to 70% of the residual disturbance,the volume explains 25%-45%,and the volatility of absolute price explains 5% to 10%.All the explanatory variables reach stable about 20-30 minutes later.Empirical result tells the weak impact from open interest to volatility of absolute yield and volume and the strong correlation between volatility of absolute yield and volume.Some investment suggestions are offered from the analysis mentioned above.

Chinese Stock Market Volatility and the Role of U.S. Economic Variables

Volatility Forecasting: the Role of Lunch-Break Returns, Overnight Returns, Trading Volume and Leverage Effects

Forecasting Stock Volatility Using Time-Distance Weighting Fundamental’s Shocks

Prediction of Volatility Based on Realized-Garch-kernel-type Models: Evidence from China and the U.S.

Prediction of Realized Volatility Based on Realized-GARCH-Kernel Model: The Comparison of CHINA and US

Sources of the Stock Price Fluctuations in Chinese Equity Market

Predicting the Volatility of the Ishares China Large-Cap ETF: What is the Role of the SSE 50 ETF?

Detecting the Macroeconomic Factors in Chinese Stock Market Returns: A Generalized Dynamic Factor Model Approach

Economic Policy Uncertainty Shocks and Chinese Stock Market Volatility: An Empirical Analysis with SVAR

Intraday Effects Analysis of Chinese Futures Markets

Forecasting the Chinese low-carbon index volatility

A dynamic analysis of the relationship between investor sentiment and stock market realized volatility: Evidence from China

Price Volatility and Expected Stock Returns:Preliminary Evidence from China's Stock Market

Modeling Chinese stock markets' volatility

Intraday Dynamics of Volatility and Duration: Evidence from Chinese Stocks

The impact of economic policy uncertainty on volatility of China’s financial stocks: An empirical analysis

On Chinese Stock Market Predictability

The Effectiveness of Regulatory Policy Changes on the Volatility Dynamics of the Chinese Stock Markets

Asymmetric volatility spillovers between economic policy uncertainty and stock markets: Evidence from China

Volatility transmissions across international oil market, commodity futures and stock markets: Empirical evidence from China

Time-Varying Return Predictability in the Chinese Stock Market