Abstract:The International Journal of Accounting, Ahead of Print. Synopsis The research problem This study examines the association between corruption culture and corporate social responsibility (CSR) decoupling. Motivation Only a handful of studies have examined the effect of local culture on organizational outcomes. Recent studies shed light on the factors contributing to CSR decoupling, highlighting the value of understanding this disparity; however, few studies have documented the role of societal factors that contribute to this gap. Our study seeks to fill this gap by documenting that corruption culture increases dishonest behavior, reduces social stigma and the likelihood of punishment, promotes managerial rent-seeking, and ultimately affects CSR decoupling. The hypothesis Corruption culture is associated with higher CSR decoupling. Target population We used a sample of Chinese A-listed firms from 2010 to 2020. Adopted methodology We used ordinary least squares, path analysis, two-stage least square (2SLS) regression, generalized method of moment (GMM), and multiperiod difference in difference. Analyses By using 5,428 firm–year observations, this study examined the association between corruption culture and CSR decoupling. We employed robustness and mechanism tests to corroborate the findings and proposed mechanisms. Finally, we conducted heterogeneity tests to assess the varied impact of corporate governance, state ownership, and CEO attributes on the relationship between corruption culture and CSR decoupling. Findings We documented a positive relationship between corruption culture and CSR decoupling. We also found a less pronounced effect of corruption on CSR decoupling among firms with extensive media coverage and investments from qualified foreign institutional investors. Furthermore, the effect of corruption on CSR decoupling was particularly pronounced for private firms. We also observed that the effect of a corruption culture was especially weak for firms with chief executive officers who have international experience, are nonpolitically connected, and are female.

Individualistic Powerfulness and Collectivistic Powerlessness Corrupts: How Power and Cultural Orientation Influence Corruption.

Power Distance, Collectivism and Corruption: An Analysis Using Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Index and Corruption Perception Index

Corporate Philanthropy and Corporate Misconduct: Evidence from China

Powerful or Powerless when Change is Needed: Effects of Power on Escalation of Commitment

Does power corrupt? The moderating effect of status

High Power, Low Power, and Equality: Culture Beyond Individualism and Collectivism

Cultural values, national personality characteristics, and intelligence as correlates of corruption: A nation level analysis

Cultural Collectivism and Tightness Moderate Responses to Norm Violators: Effects on Power Perception, Moral Emotions, and Leader Support

Is Individual Bribery or Organizational Bribery More Intolerable in China (versus in the United States)? Advancing Theory on the Perception of Corrupt Acts

How Do Power and Status Differ in Predicting Unethical Decisions? A Cross-National Comparison of China and Canada

Does Local Culture Affect CSR Transparency? The Effect of Corruption Culture on CSR Decoupling

Cultural Difference in Perception of Individual versus Organizational Bribery

CEO Power, Bank Risk-Taking and National Culture: International Evidence

Cultural orientation, power, belief in conspiracy theories, and intentions to reduce the spread of COVID‐19

When and Why Does Sense of Power Hinder Self‐reported Helping Behavior? Testing a Moderated Mediation Model in Chinese Undergraduates

Cheating at the Top: Trait Dominance Explains Dishonesty More Consistently Than Social Power

An Analysis of Collective Corruption: A Perspective of Human Relations

Leadership styles and group organizational citizenship behavior across cultures

Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior Across the Cultures: A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents From 16 Countries

Does Power Corrupt? An Empirical Study of Power, Accountability, and Performance Triangle in Public Administration