Abstract:Introduction: There are three main types of culture in human society, namely, individual-oriented, relationship-oriented and social-oriented cultures. In history, there are two main positions on the relationship between culture and self-construal: the cultural determinist position and the interaction position. After analyzing literature critically, we propose that the interaction position is more persuasive than the cultural determinist position. A self-construal model was constructed from an interactionist and polycultural perspective, pointing out the relationship between three cultures and self-construal. We argue that individuals interacting with cultures in the context of globalization can develop a more integrated self-construal. The present study proposes the existence of polycultural self-construal, and aimed to explore how self-construal factors relate to cultures. Methods: Three approaches—psychological tests, priming with cultural icons and content analysis—were used to explore mechanisms between cultures (individual-oriented, relationship-oriented, and social-oriented cultures) and self-construal. In Study 1, we recruited 460 undergraduate students as participants through campus advertising to complete three psychological tests, namely, the Cultural Identity Scale (CIS), the Marlowe-Crowne Social Approval Scale (MC-SDS), and the Polycultural Self-construal Scale (PSCS). In Study 2, we created icon materials that could prime the three cultures. The experimental process was divided into two stages: priming and measurement. First, 165 participants were presented with icon materials on the computer screen to activate the corresponding culture, and then they were asked to complete the PSCS. In Study 3, the experimental procedures were followed as for Study 2. Then the Ten Statements Test (TST) was used. Each of the 178 participants gave 10 different responses to the question of "Who am I?." Each participant's "I am ..." narratives were qualitatively processed using content analysis. Results: The individual-oriented culture mainly affects the individuality and equality factor of self-construal. The relationship-oriented culture mainly impacts the relationality factor of self-construal, while the social-oriented culture mainly affects the collectivity and equality factors of self-construal. There were no significant differences in the effects of the three cultures on the autonomy factor of self-construal. The multi-components of the polycultural self-construal are difficult to interpret based on one culture type. All three cultures have specific and shared effects on human self-construal.

High Power, Low Power, and Equality: Culture Beyond Individualism and Collectivism

Culture Change Requires Personal and Organizational Changes: Lessons from the Shared Equity Leadership Model

Socioeconomic Status and Cultural Difference

Measuring culture outside the head: a meta-analysis of individualism-collectivism in cultural products

Collective action control: Ubiquitous processes and cultural differences

Power Distance, Individualism/Collectivism, and Job-Related Attitudes in a Culturally Diverse Work Group

Cooperation in multicultural negotiations: How the cultures of people with low and high power interact.

Cultural Collectivism and Tightness Moderate Responses to Norm Violators: Effects on Power Perception, Moral Emotions, and Leader Support

Culture Three Ways: Culture and Subcultures Within Countries

The expanded view of individualism and collectivism: One, two, or four dimensions?

Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations

Self- and Other-Orientation in High Rank: A Cultural Psychological Approach to Social Hierarchy

Culture and self-construal in the age of globalization: an empirical inquiry based on multiple approaches

SUPPORT FROM THE ORGANIZATION AND CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIORS: DO CULTURAL VALUES MATTER?

Culture and Decision Making in China, Japan, Russia, and the United States

Dimensions of Culture (Geert H. Hofstede) – Individualism and Collectivism

Power Distance and Facework Strategies

Accepting Inequality Deters Responsibility: How Power Distance Decreases Charitable Behavior

Delineating a method to study cross-cultural differences with experimental control: The voice effect and countercultural contexts regarding power distance