Abstract:BackgroundTrochanteric fractures usually require surgical treatment. The currently used classification system, such as AO classification, cannot cover all variant types, and is poor in reliability, causing confusion in surgical decision making. This study describes a simple, well-covered, re-liable, accurate, and clinically useful classification.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of 907 patients with trochanteric fractures treated by us from 1,999 to 2019 and proposed a new classification according to radiographs. Then, 50 records randomly selected in proportion were examined by 10 observers (5 experienced and 5 inexperienced) independently according to AO and the new classification. After a 2-week interval, repeat evaluation was completed. The Kappa coefficient was used to investigate the intra-observer reliability, inter-observer reliability and the agreement between the observers and the “reference standard”.ResultsThe new classification system includes 12 types composed of 3 medial groups and 4 lateral groups. According to the medial buttress, the fractures are divided into group I (intact lesser trochanter, adequate but-tress), group II (incomplete lesser trochanter, effective cortical buttress after reduction) and group III (huge defect of the medial cortex). According to the penetration region of the lateral fracture line, the fractures are divided into group A (intact lateral cortex), group B (incomplete lateral cortex), group C (subtrochanteric fractures) and group D (multiple lateral fracture lines). All of the included cases can be classified according to the new classification, of which 34 (3.75%) cases are unclassifiable by the AO classification. Intra-observer: The experienced achieved substantial agreement using both AO [k = 0.61 (95% confidence interval 0.46–0.76)] and new classification [k = 0.65 (0.55–0.76)]. The inexperienced reached moderate agreement using both AO [k = 0.48 (0.33–0.62)] and new classification [k = 0.60 (0.50–0.71)]. Inter-observer: The overall reliabilities for AO [k = 0.51 (0.49–0.53)] and for new classification [k = 0.57 (0.55–0.58)] were both moderate. The agreement between the experienced and the reference standard according to AO [k = 0.61 (0.49–0.74)] and new classification [k = 0.63 (0.54–0.72)] were both substantial. The agreement between the inexperienced and the reference standard according to AO [k = 0.48 (0.45–0.50)] and the new classification [k = 0.48 (0.41–0.54)] were both moderate.ConclusionCompared with AO classification, our new classification is better in coverage, reliability and accuracy, and has the feasibility of clinical verification and promotion.

CT-based Five-Segment Classification in Freiberg's Infarction: Evaluation of Its Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability.

Intra- and inter-observer reliability assessment of widely used classifications and the "Ten-segment classification" of tibial plateau fractures

Is the Diagnosis of fifth Metatarsal Fracture Type Consistent? An Interobserver Reliability Study

Establishment and preliminary evaluation of CT-based classification for distal radius fracture

Inter-observer reliability assessment of the Schatzker, AO/OTA and three-column classification of tibial plateau fractures

Computed Tomography-Based Three-Column Classification in Tibial Plateau Fractures: Introduction of Its Utility and Assessment of Its Reproducibility

The Reliability and Accuracy of the Medial Malleolar Fracture Classification Based on <scp>3D CT</scp> Reconstruction

Reliability of Classification Systems for Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Proximal Femur in Experienced Orthopaedic Surgeons

Proposal and Validation of a New Classification for Trochanteric Fractures Based on Medial Buttress and Lateral Cortical Integrity.

An evaluation of intra and inter observer reliability of the five used classification systems of tibial plateau fractures

Effect of Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Reconstructions on Reliability of Classification of Calcaneal Fractures

The interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the cooney classification of distal radius fractures between experienced orthopaedic surgeons

Interobserver Reliability of Schatzker, AO Foundation-Orthopaedic Trauma Association, and Luo Classifications for Tibial Plateau Fractures: Does Three-Dimensional CT Improve Outcomes?

Effect of clinician's experience and expertise on the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the computed tomography-based classification systems in posterior malleolus fractures

Introduction and An Analysis of Inter- and Intra-observer Validity to the Classification of Hoffa-Like Tibial Plateau Fractures

Intrarater and Inter-rater Reliability of Tibial Plateau Fracture Classifications: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Microstructural and Mechanical Evaluations of Region Segmentation Methods in Classifications of Osteonecrosis.

A Study on Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability of the Huashan Radiologic Classification System for Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Without Fracture and Dislocation

Intra- and Interobserver Reliability of the New Classification System of Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity

Three-Column Classification for Fracture of Tibial Plateau and the Related Reliability Assessment

Reliability and application of the new morphological classification system for chronic symptomatic osteoporotic thoracolumbar fracture