Abstract:Background: Fracture-dislocations of the elbow, particularly those that involve a fracture through the proximal ulna, are complex and can be difficult to manage. Moreover, current classification systems often cannot discriminate between Monteggia-variant injury patterns and trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations, particularly when the fracture involves the coronoid. The Mayo classification of proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations categorizes these fractures into 3 types according to what the coronoid is still attached to: trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations (the coronoid is still attached to the ulnar metaphysis); Monteggia-variant fracture-dislocations (the coronoid is still attached to the olecranon); and ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations (the coronoid is not attached to either the olecranon or the ulnar metaphysis). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver agreement of the Mayo classification system when assessing elbow fracture-dislocations involving the proximal ulna based on radiographs and computed tomography scans. Methods: Three fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeons and 2 fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons blindly and independently evaluated the radiographs and computed tomography scans of 90 consecutive proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations treated at a level I trauma center. The inclusion criteria included subluxation or dislocation of the elbow and/or radioulnar joint with a complete fracture through the proximal ulna. Each surgeon classified all fractures according to the Mayo classification, which is based on what the coronoid remains attached to (ulnar metaphysis, olecranon, or neither). Intraobserver reliability was determined by scrambling the order of the fractures and having each observer classify all the fractures again after a washout period ≥ 6 weeks. Interobserver reliability was obtained to assess the overall agreement between observers. κ Values were calculated for both intraobserver reliability and interobserver reliability. Results: The average intraobserver agreement was 0.87 (almost perfect agreement; range, 0.76-0.91). Interobserver agreement was 0.80 (substantial agreement; range, 0.70-0.90) for the first reading session and 0.89 (almost perfect agreement; range, 0.85-0.93) for the second reading session. The overall average interobserver agreement was 0.85 (almost perfect agreement; range, 0.79-0.91). Conclusion: Classifying proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations based on what the coronoid remains attached to (olecranon, ulnar metaphysis, or neither) was associated with almost perfect intraobserver and interobserver agreement, regardless of trauma vs. shoulder and elbow fellowship training. Further research is needed to determine whether the use of this classification system leads to the application of principles specific to the management of these injuries and translates into better outcomes.

The interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the cooney classification of distal radius fractures between experienced orthopaedic surgeons

Reproducibility of the Mayo and Schatzker classification systems in proximal ulna fractures

Assessment of Interobserver Variability for CT Scan-Based Evaluation of Posterior Ligament Complex Injury in Thoracolumbar Fractures: an International Multicenter Pilot Study.

Reliability of Classification Systems for Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Proximal Femur in Experienced Orthopaedic Surgeons

Establishment and preliminary evaluation of CT-based classification for distal radius fracture

Inter-observer reliability assessment of the Schatzker, AO/OTA and three-column classification of tibial plateau fractures

Intra- and inter-observer reliability assessment of widely used classifications and the "Ten-segment classification" of tibial plateau fractures

A coronoid-centric classification system of proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations has almost perfect intraobserver and interobserver agreement

An evaluation of intra and inter observer reliability of the five used classification systems of tibial plateau fractures

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability in the load sharing classification of the assessment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Intrarater and Inter-rater Reliability of Tibial Plateau Fracture Classifications: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems

Reliability of the 2018 Revised Version of AO/OTA Classification for Femoral Shaft Fractures

Introduction and An Analysis of Inter- and Intra-observer Validity to the Classification of Hoffa-Like Tibial Plateau Fractures

The Reliability and Accuracy of the Medial Malleolar Fracture Classification Based on <scp>3D CT</scp> Reconstruction

Comparison of Interobserver Agreement of Four Classification Systems for Lateral Clavicle Fractures Between Two Groups of Surgeons: A Multicenter Study

Interobserver Reliability of Schatzker, AO Foundation-Orthopaedic Trauma Association, and Luo Classifications for Tibial Plateau Fractures: Does Three-Dimensional CT Improve Outcomes?

Revising the Modified Neer Classification for Distal Clavicle Fractures: Description and Reliability.

Is the Diagnosis of fifth Metatarsal Fracture Type Consistent? An Interobserver Reliability Study

Effect of clinician's experience and expertise on the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the computed tomography-based classification systems in posterior malleolus fractures

Proposal and Validation of a New Classification for Trochanteric Fractures Based on Medial Buttress and Lateral Cortical Integrity.