Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Resection for Benign Retroperitoneal Tumors: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Ziqi Hou,Qingyun Xie,Guoteng Qiu,Zhaoxing Jin,Shizheng Mi,Chang Liu,Jiwei Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10504-0
2023-01-01
Surgical Endoscopy
Abstract:Benign retroperitoneal tumors (BRTs) are clinically rare solid tumors. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal resection for BRTs. The clinical data of 43 patients who had pathologically confirmed BRTs and underwent laparoscopic resection in a single center from January 2019 to May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical methods: the Transperitoneal approach group (n = 24) and the Retroperitoneal approach group (n = 19). The clinical characteristics and perioperative data between the two groups were compared. The baseline data and surgical variables were analyzed to determine the impact of different surgical approaches on the treatment outcomes of BRTs. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in gender, age, body mass index, the American Society of Anesthesiologists score, presence of underlying diseases, tumor size, tumor position, operation duration, intraoperative hemorrhage, postoperative hospital stay, intestinal function recovery time, and postoperative complication rate. The conversion rate from laparoscopic to open surgery was significantly lower in the Transperitoneal approach group than in the Retroperitoneal approach group (1/24 vs. 5/19, χ2 = 4.333, P = 0.037). Tumor size was an independent influencing factor for the effect of surgery (odds ratio = 1.869, 95
What problem does this paper attempt to address?