Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficiency of transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (T-LRP) and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (E-LRP). Methods Clinical data 130 patients with prostate cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy from January 2010 and December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Of these patients, 72 were done by transperitoneal style and 58 by extraperitoneal style. The BMI, preoperative PSA, preoperative Gleason grade, c-TNM, operating time, bleeding volume during operation, blood transfusions rate, postoperative pain, the recovery time of intestinal function, the duration of catheterization, hospitalization stay after operation, complication, p-TNM, continence rate were comparatively analyzed. Results Operations of two groups were all successfully performed. One case of T-LRP group and 1 case of E-LRP were converted to open surgery. The mean operating time of T-LRP group was longer than that of the E-LRP group, (120.6±92.6)min vs.(110.8±100.5)min ,and there was statistical difference between these two groups(P<0.001). The mean bleeding volume during operation of T-LRP group was more than that of the E-LRP group , (110.9±50.6)ml vs.(95.8±123.5)ml, there was a statistical difference between these two groups(P<0.05). The duration of catheterization of T-LRP group was longer than that of the E-LRP group, (13.42±4.64)days vs.(12.33±4.82)days, there was a statistical difference between these two groups (P<0.05). The hospitalization of T-LRP group was longer than that of the E-LRP group, (14.54±5.25)days vs.(11.63±5.82)days, there was a statistical difference between these two groups(P<0.05). 120 patients were followed up for 6~42months, and the median time was 32 months. In the T-LRP group and E-LRP group, the continence rate at the time of pulling the urine tube was 48.6%(35/72)vs34.5%(20/58); the six-month continence rate was 63.8%(46/72)vs. 89.6%(52/58), there was statistical difference between these two groups(P<0.05, P<0.001,separately).But there was no statistical difference between these two groups in the one-year continence rate (P=0.324). Conclusion E-LRP and T-LRP have the equivalent oncological and functional outcomes. ELRP is superior to T-LRP with respect to faster recovery of continence. E-LRP shows some advantage over T-LRP including the small of intraoperative trauma ,short operation time, fewer abdominal complications, quicker recovery, etc.

Comparative Study of Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy and Open Radical Prostatectomy

Comparative study of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy

Comparison of Outcomes in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy and Open Radical Prostatectomy

Comparison of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Comparison of oncologic and functional outcomes by retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localized and locally advanced prostate cancer

Analysis of clinical effect of transperitoneal approach and extraperitoneal approach for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Comparative study on the efficacy and safety of robot assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy

Robot-assisted and Laparoscopic Vs Open Radical Prostatectomy in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Perioperative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes

Clinical Outcomes after Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Robot-Assisted And Laparoscopic Vs Open Radical Prostatectomy In Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Perioperative, Functional, And Oncological Outcomes A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

A Retrospective Comparison of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Versus Laparoscopic Prostatectomy for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer

Comparison of efficacy and safety of conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by the transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal procedure

Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A meta-analysis

Comparison of robotic-assistant laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and retropubic radical prostatectomy

Comparison between 3D and 2D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer treatment

Open Radical Prostatectomy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: Report of 132 Cases

A Comparison Of Perioperative Outcome Between Robot-Assisted And Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Experience Of A Single Institution

Comparison of Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy and Standard Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: a Meta-Analysis

Results of study of 126 cases underwent laparoscopic radical Prostatectomy during three years' follow -up

Clinical outcome and early complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Perioperative differences in open radical prostatectomy versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy