Abstract:Background Many studies have shown that positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence could impact the life of patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. With more and more patients with prostate cancer appeared in recent 20 years in China, it is necessary to investigate the risk of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence, and their possible impact on the prognosis of patients treated with radical prostatectomy. In this study, we analyzed the characteristics of patients with prostate cancer who had undergone radical prostatectomy in Macau area and tried to find any risk factor of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence and their relationship with the prognosis of these patients. Methods From 2000 to 2009, 149 patients with prostate cancer received radical prostatectomy and were followed up. Among these patients, 111 received retropubic radical prostatectomies, 38 received laparoscopic radical prostatectomies. All patients were followed-up on in the 3rd month, 6th month and from that point on every 6 months after operation. At each follow-up a detailed record of any complaint, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), full biochemical test and uroflowmetry was acquired. Results The average age was (69.0 +/- 6.1) years, preoperative average serum PSA was (10.1 +/- 12.1) ng/ml and average Gleason score was 6.4 +/- 1.3. The incidence of total complications was about 47.7%, the incidence of the most common complication, bladder outlet obstruction, was about 26.8%, and that of the second most common complication, urinary stress incontinence, was about 16.1% (mild 9.4% and severe 6.7%). The incidence of positive surgical margin was about 38.3%. The preoperative serum PSA ((13.4 +/- 17.6) ng/ml), average Gleason score (7.1 +/- 1.3) and pathological T stage score (7.0 +/- 1.4) were higher in patients with positive surgical margins than those with negative margins ((8.0 +/- 5.8) ng/ml, 6.0 +/- 1.2 and 5.4 +/- 1.4, respectively) (P=0.004, P=0.001 and P=0.001, respectively). A univariate analysis showed that positive surgical margin had a positive statistical association with serum PSA (P=0.007), Gleason score (P < 0.001), pathological T stage score (P < 0.001) and biochemical recurrence (BCR) (P=0.035). The most common location of a positive surgical margin was in the apex of the prostate, which was about 63% (36/57). Sixty-four percent (23/36) of patients with positive surgical margin in apex were also involved in prostate lobe; other locations were prostate lobe (23%, 13/57), seminal vesicle (9%, 5/57). The multivariate analysis showed that positive surgical margin had a positive statistical association with Gleason score (P=0.03) and pathological T stage score (P=0.02). Neither univariate analysis or multivariate analysis showed any statistical relationship between BCR and any other risk factors covered in this study. Conclusions Positive surgical margin is associated with pre-operative PSA, Gleason score, pathological T stage and biochemical recurrence. Earlier diagnosis and improved techniques of dissection of prostate apex could decrease the incidence of positive surgical margins. Chin Med J 2011;124(7):1001-1005

Status of surgical margin:laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy

Comparative study of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy

Risk Factors Analysis for Positive Surgical Margins in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Prognostic Effect of Postoperative Resection-Margin Status for Intraoperative Positive Resection Margins in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer

Risk Factors for Positive Surgical Margins in Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Incidence and location of positive surgical margin among open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients: a single institutional analysis

Comparison of Outcomes in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy and Open Radical Prostatectomy

Risk Factors of Positive Surgical Margin and Biochemical Recurrence of Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy： a Single-Center 10-Year Report

Clinical Evaluation of Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Colon Cancer

Comparative Study of Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy and Open Radical Prostatectomy

Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus

Reevaluation of laparoscopic surgery's value in pathological T4 colon cancer with comparison to open surgery: A retrospective and propensity score-matched study.

Laparoscopic Vs. Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Single-Institution, Propensity Score Matching Study in China

Treatment of the Positive Surgical Margin Following Radical Prostatectomy.

Perineural invasion status, Gleason score and number of positive cores in biopsy pathology are predictors of positive surgical margin following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Effect of positive surgical margin on postoperative biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy after Previous Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Clinical T1a and T1b Prostate Cancer: A Matched-Pair Analysis.

Comparison between 3D and 2D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer treatment

Evaluation of Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Total Mesorectal Excision for Mid and Distal Rectal Cancer

Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A meta-analysis

Comparative study of each surgical step in radical prostatectomy under 3D and 2D laparoscopy