Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the value of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) in identifying benign and malignant renal masses and differentiating the histological types of renal masses. METHODS:Fifteen healthy volunteers and 46 patients with renal masses proven by pathology, including clear cell carcinomas (n = 18), papillary carcinomas (n = 8), chromophobe carcinomas (n = 7) and angiomyolipomas (n = 13), were examined with DWI and PWI scan at 3.0 T MRI. ANOVA was employed to compare the values of transfer constant (K(trans)), rate constant of backflux (Kep) and extra-vascular extra-cellular space fractional volume (Ve) proceeded by PWI and the value of ADC resulted from DWI between normal kidney and different histological types of renal masses. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of the methods of PWI and DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. RESULTS:The ADC value of normal renal parenchyma was (2.10 ± 0.24) × 10⁻³ mm²/s, which was statistically higher than benign and malignant renal masses (P < 0.05). The ADC value of benign masses was statistically higher than that of all histological types of malignant masses (P < 0.05). Among three histological types of malignancies, clear cell carcinoma showed the statistically highest ADC value (P < 0.05). But the difference between papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma had no statistical significance (P > 0.05).Values of K(trans), Kep and Ve between normal renal parenchyma and different histological types of renal masses had statistical differences.Values of K(trans) and Ve in three histological types of malignant renal masses were statistically higher than those of benign renal masses.Kep value of clear cell carcinoma was significantly higher than that of benign renal masses (P < 0.05).However, other histological types of malignant masses had no significant difference with benign masses.For three malignant masses, K(trans) of clear cell carcinoma, papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma were (0.85 ± 0.27), (0.51 ± 0.04) and (0.39 ± 0.05)/min respectively. All values gradually reduced. And the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The Ve value of renal clear cell carcinoma was statistically higher than that of papillary carcinoma (P < 0.05). ROC curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of PWI versus DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. The K(trans) of benign and malignant renal masses had the largest AUC (AUC = 0.937) at a threshold of 0.38/min. And there were a sensitivity of 87.9% and a specificity of 85.7%. The AUC of ADC was 0.823, sensitivity 72.7% and specificity 92.9%. The ADC threshold for differentiating benign from malignant masses was 1.40 × 10⁻³ mm²/s; AUC of Ve 0.803, sensitivity 78.8% and specificity 71.4%, a threshold of 0.29/min; Kep showed lower diagnostic value. CONCLUSION:3.0 T MRI DWI and PWI can effectively differentiate benign and different histological types of malignant renal masses. And PWI is superior to DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses.K(trans) with the largest AUC showed the highest diagnostic value. And ADC is also irreplaceable in providing the information of cellular structural features and the movement of water diffusion.

Higher Field Reduced FOV Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Abdominal Imaging at 5.0 Tesla: Image Quality Evaluation Compared with 3.0 Tesla.

Reduced Field-of-view Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) in Patients with Gastric Cancer

Preliminary Experience of 5.0 T Higher Field Abdominal Diffusion-Weighted MRI: Agreement of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient With 3.0 T Imaging

Comparison of reduced field‐of‐view diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and conventional DWI techniques in the assessment of rectal carcinoma at 3.0T: Image quality and histological T staging

3D Isotropic Resolution Diffusion-Prepared Magnitude-Stabilized Bssfp Imaging with High Geometric Fidelity at 1.5 Tesla

Cardiac Balanced Steady-State Free Precession MRI at 0.35 T: a Comparison Study with 1.5 T.

Comparison of Reduced and Full Field of View in Diffusion‐Weighted MRI on Image Quality: A Meta‐Analysis

Quality Assessment of Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Normal Breast: Intraindividual Comparison of 3.0 T and 1.5 T MRI

Abdominal Imaging at 5.0 Tesla: Preliminary Results

T2-weighted MRI and Reduced-Fov Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Human Pancreas at 5 T: A Comparison Study with 3 T

Improved abdominal T1 weighted imaging at 0.55T

Comparative Study of Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Normal Liver Parenchyma at 3.0 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla MRI

Abdominal MRI on a Commercial 0.55T System: Initial Evaluation and Comparison to Higher Field Strengths

Large field diffusion weighted imaging on 3. 0T MR: Initial study

Stability and Repeatability of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) of Normal Pancreas on 5.0 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

[Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Perfusion Weighted Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Renal Masses on 3.0 T MRI].

Renal Imaging at 5 T Versus 3 T: a Comparison Study

Comparison of Diffusion-Weighted Mri Acquisition Techniques for Normal Pancreas at 3.0 Tesla

Comparison of single shot and multishot diffusion-weighted imaging in 5-T magnetic resonance imaging for brain disease diagnosis

Optimizing Image Quality with High-Resolution, Deep-Learning-Based Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Breast Cancer Patients at 1.5 T

Research advances in reduced field of view diffusion weighted imaging