Abstract:IntroductionMRI has been increasingly used in radiation therapy to facilitate tumor and organ delineation and assess treatment response. Diffusion MRI can provide cellularity information and may enable functional‐based treatment planning and adaptation. However, strong distortion associated with the conventional diffusion‐weighted single‐shot echo‐planar imaging (DW‐ssEPI) sequence is problematic for accurate target delineation. The goal of this work is to propose a 3D diffusion sequence with minimal distortion for radiation therapy applications.MethodsA 3D diffusion‐prepared magnitude‐stabilized balanced steady‐state free precession sequence (DP‐MS‐bSSFP) was developed. A 2D navigator was acquired during the linear catalyzation stage of the bSSFP readout to estimate the phase, which was then used in a plane‐by‐plane low‐rank constrained reconstruction to correct the shot‐to‐shot k‐space inconsistency. A diffusion phantom was scanned to evaluate and compare the geometric reliability and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) accuracy with the conventional DW‐ssEPI. Eight landmarks were selected on each slice of the images to calculate the target registration error (TRE), which was used as a surrogate for geometric fidelity. The phantom was scanned under both 0℃ and room temperature. Brain scans were performed on five healthy volunteers. In the first volunteer, protocols of 1, 2, and 4 shots per Kz plane were compared. In vivo geometric fidelity and ADC accuracy were evaluated on the remaining four volunteers using the protocol of four shots per Kz plane. In the geometric fidelity study, 8–10 landmarks were picked on each slice to calculate the TRE. Regions of interest were placed on the white matter, the cerebellum, and the cerebrospinal fluid region to evaluate the ADC agreement between DW‐ssEPI and DP‐MS using the Bland‐Altman plot. All scans were performed at 1.5 mm isotropic resolution to meet the high‐resolution requirement of many radiotherapy applications.ResultsThe DP‐MS had drastically improved geometric accuracy compared with DW‐ssEPI on the phantom. The mean TRE decreased from 2.09 mm to 0.70 mm. The percentage difference of the ADC values between the two diffusion sequences were less than 5.5% and 7% for the 0℃ and room temperature study, respectively. The DW‐ssEPI had strong distortion and susceptibility‐related artifacts at tissue air boundary, whereas distortion was minimal in DP‐MS images. Overall, the mean/max TRE was over 2 mm/7 mm in the volunteers for DW‐ssEPI, whereas less than 0.8 mm/2 mm for DP‐MS. Good ADC agreement was observed for the white matter, the cerebellum, and the CSF based on the Bland‐Altman plots.ConclusionA 3D diffusion sequence was developed and validated. It provided high‐resolution diffusion imaging with mean distortion less than 1 mm at 1.5 T, and is a promising imaging technique for treatment planning and adaptive radiotherapy.

Comparison of Diffusion Weighted Images Using Different Fat Suppression Sequences at 3.0 T MRI of the Breast

Quality Assessment of Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Normal Breast: Intraindividual Comparison of 3.0 T and 1.5 T MRI

Comparison of reduced field‐of‐view diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and conventional DWI techniques in the assessment of rectal carcinoma at 3.0T: Image quality and histological T staging

3D Isotropic Resolution Diffusion-Prepared Magnitude-Stabilized Bssfp Imaging with High Geometric Fidelity at 1.5 Tesla

Improving the image quality of DWI in breast cancer: comparison of multi-shot DWI using multiplexed sensitivity encoding to conventional single-shot echo-planar imaging DWI

Comparative Study of Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Normal Liver Parenchyma at 3.0 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla MRI

MR Diffusion Weighted Imaging with Background Signal Suppression in Breast Cancer

Evaluation of diffusion-weighted MR imaging sequences of normal pancreas at 3.0T

Fat-signal suppression in breast diffusion-weighted imaging: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Clinical Study on Different Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging Sequences for Pancreatic Cancer at 3.0 T

Comparative utility of MRI perfusion with MSIDR and DWIBS for the characterization of breast tumors.

Value of Diffusion-weighted Imaging with Different b Values in the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions at 3.0T MRI

Diagnostic Value of Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Breast Lesions at 3.0T MR

The Diagnostic Value of MR Diffusion Weighted Imaging, Perfusion Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Imaging in Breast Lesions

Optimizing Image Quality with High-Resolution, Deep-Learning-Based Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Breast Cancer Patients at 1.5 T

Breast Density Assessment Using a 3T MRI System: Comparison among Different Sequences

The Effect of Intravenous Administration of Gadolinium Contrast Medium on Diffusion-Weighted MR of Breast

Higher Field Reduced FOV Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Abdominal Imaging at 5.0 Tesla: Image Quality Evaluation Compared with 3.0 Tesla.

Sequence and Position: the Selection in MRI of the Breast

Comparison of Diffusion-Weighted Mri Acquisition Techniques for Normal Pancreas at 3.0 Tesla

Accelerated 3D high-resolution T2-weighted breast MRI with deep learning constrained compressed sensing, comparison with conventional T2-weighted sequence on 3.0 T