Sharing Errors Where Everyone Is Perfect—Culture, Emotional Dynamics, and Error Sharing in Two Consulting Firms

A. Werr,Jonas Dahl

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2019.0188

2021-07-29

Academy of Management Discoveries

Abstract:Providers of complex business services often focus on creating positive experiences and emotions to manage their clients’ impressions and their consultants’ self-esteem. This, however, creates chal...

Psychology,Business

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

How Does Knowledge Sharing among Advisors from Different Disciplines Affect the Quality of the Services Provided to the Family Business Client? an Investigation from the Family Business Advisor’s Perspective

Emma Su,Junsheng Dou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486513491978

2013-01-01

Family Business Review

Abstract:This study examined how, from the family business advisor’s perspective, knowledge sharing among external individual advisors can affect the quality of services provided to the family business client. Using qualitative research methods, we found that knowledge sharing improved the quality of advising services through four mechanisms: (a) by improving the accuracy of issue identification, (b) by achieving a systematic analysis of the issue, (c) by arriving at an integrated total solution, and (d) by increasing the credibility of the provided solution. This study has important implications for literature in the field of family business advising, as it explains the underlying mechanisms through which knowledge sharing among individual external advisors enhances the quality of advising services.
Learn to build an error management culture

Elianne van Steenbergen,Danny van Dijk,Céline Christensen,Tessa Coffeng,Naomi Ellemers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/jfrc-12-2018-0156

2019-10-14

Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance

Abstract:Purpose Emphasizing that errors are unacceptable and will be sanctioned does not prevent that errors are made – but can cause workers to cover up mistakes. Making an effort to identify things that go wrong to learn from them and prevent errors in the future offers a more fruitful approach. By sharing an applicable LEARN framework, this paper aims to inspire and give direction to financial corporations in building an error management culture within their organizations. Design/methodology/approach The behavior and culture team of the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) collaborated closely with social and organizational psychologists from Utrecht University to study error management. The results of a literature study were combined with the findings obtained from a survey ( N = 436) and in-depth interviews ( N = 15) among employees of 13 Dutch financial corporations that are active within the infrastructure of the capital markets. Findings Tone at the top and direct managers’ behavior were positively related to error management culture, which in turn related to more learning. Combining these findings with relevant psychological literature resulted in the LEARN framework, which can guide organizations in developing actions and interventions to build an effective error management culture: L et the board take ownership, E ngage employees, A lign structure and culture, R efocus from person to system and N arrate the best examples. Originality/value Stimulating financial corporations to start building a healthier corporate culture by offering the LEARN framework – and recruiting insights from social and organizational psychology to do so – extends traditional supervisory approaches.
Error reframing: studying the promotion of an error management culture

Julien Cusin,Anne Goujon-Belghit

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1623786

2019-10-07

European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

Abstract:In the organizational behaviour and organizational psychology literature, individual errors are considered either as sources of blame (error-prevention culture) or as sources of learning and something to be encouraged in order to promote innovation (error-management culture). While we can assume that a third perspective exists somewhere in between, error management is usually considered as the best solution. Yet scholars have tended to neglect the planned and directed transition from a pure error-prevention to an error-management culture. We thus examine to what extent and under what conditions an organization can culturally transform the representation of individual errors through its business leaders. To answer this question, we conducted a qualitative study on the case of a French insurance company. We portray a realistic image of the promotion of an error management culture, pointing out certain limitations and constraints, while nonetheless identifying some conditions for successful error reframing.

psychology, applied,management
Learning From Each Other: How Are Architectural Mistakes Communicated in Industry?

Marion Wiese,Axel-Frederik Brand,André van Hoorn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.05575

2023-07-10

Abstract:Context. Own experiences and faulty decisions can be an important source of information for software architects. The experiences and mistakes of other architects can also be valuable information sources. Goal. Under the assumption that the knowledge about faulty decisions, i.e., mistakes, regarding software architecture is not shared adequately in practice, this work qualitatively investigates the handling and particularly communication of those mistakes by software architects. Method. We conducted a grounded-theory study in which we interviewed ten German software architects from various domains. Results. We identified software architects' definitions of architectural mistakes, their handling of these mistakes, and their preferred communication strategies regarding these mistakes. We found that architects communicate mistakes mainly within their project teams and seldom within or across companies. Conclusions. We derived strategies to make learning and prevention of mistakes more effective. To share experiences and knowledge beyond architects' peer groups, companies should invest more effort in discussing mistakes more consciously and create an environment where mistakes can be discussed openly.

Software Engineering
Confronting failure: antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups

Mark D. Cannon,Amy C. Edmondson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.85

IF: 6.8

2001-01-01

Journal of Organizational Behavior

Abstract:This paper contributes to a growing body of research on shared cognition by examining shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups. We argue that the popular ideal of organizational learning from failure is likely to be impeded by powerful psychological and organizational barriers to engaging in behaviors through which this can occur. We hypothesize that people hold tacit beliefs about appropriate responses to mistakes, problems and conflict, and that these are shared within and vary between organizational work groups (H1). These shared beliefs vary in the extent to which they take a learning approach to failure – specifically in the extent to which they endorse identifying, discussing, and analysing mistakes, problems, and conflicts. We also hypothesize that effective coaching, clear direction and a supportive work context influence beliefs related to failure (H2), and that beliefs about failure influence group performance (H3). These hypotheses combine to suggest a theoretical model of antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in work groups. The paper presents empirical evidence from a recent field study to test the model and finds support for Hypotheses 1, 2, and 3. Hypothesis 4 – that shared beliefs about failure mediate between the antecedents and the outcome of group performance – was not supported. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

management,business,psychology, applied
The profitable art of service recovery

C W Hart,J L Heskett,W E Sasser Jr

Abstract:In services, mistakes are a fact of life. No matter how hard companies try, they can't prevent the occasional late flight or missed delivery. But they can learn to recover from them. Consider how Club Med-Cancun turned a service nightmare into a memorable experience. When a flight to Cancun left New York six hours late, made two unexpected stops, ran out of food, and had a rough landing, the vacationers on board were certain their holiday was ruined. But the Club Med manager greeted the travelers with food and music and chauffeured them back to the resort. In the end, the vacationers had a better time than if the flight had gone like clockwork. Service recovery starts with identifying the problem. The Bank of Maine in Portland pays customers $1 for writing a letter about the service they received. American Express uses an "800" number to solicit customer complaints. Once they've identified a problem, service companies must act fast. When Smith & Hawken realized that it was taking months to resolve customers' problems by mail, the company decided to use the phone instead. Most important, service companies should encourage frontline employees to deviate from the rules when necessary. Some companies use role playing to help employees develop the creative thinking needed to deal with unusual situations. Sonesta Hotels uses a game in which teams win points for coming up with good solutions to realistic problems. Also, employees must have the authority and responsibility to act on their beliefs-to make phone calls, credit accounts, or send flowers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Social Outcomes of Leader Covering up Errors for Employee: A Relational Identification Perspective

Qiao-Ting HU,Junjie WEI,Xiaoyun Xie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2022.13251abstract

2022-01-01

Abstract:Leader covering up errors for employee defined as the act of leaders keeping employee’s errors known only to those who make mistakes is common in today’s workplace, yet research on errors has focused on how employees coping with their own errors (e.g., learning from errors, reporting errors) and has paid less attention to how leaders dealing with employee’s errors. Thus, existing theory is unclear on the consequences of leader covering up errors for employee. Drawing on relational identification theory, we propose that leader covering up errors for employee produces social gains for leaders. The results of a multi-source, three-wave field study revealed that leader covering up errors for employee was positively related to OCB toward leader via relational identification with leader. Furthermore, the extent to which leader covering up errors for employee was associated with relational identification with leader depended upon employee psychological entitlement, such that employees experienced higher relational identification with leader when their psychological entitlement was high rather than low. Overall, our work provides insights into the social consequences of leader covering up errors for employee and offers theoretical contributions for research on errors.
Error Disclosure Climate and Safety Climate Trajectories: the Mediating Role of Counterfactual Sharing

Yimin He,Jin Lee,Yueng-hsiang Huang,Xiang Yao,Theodore K. Courtney

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09830-2

IF: 6.604

2022-01-01

Journal of Business and Psychology

Abstract:Safety climate evolves in reflection of the effectiveness of organizational safety management efforts. The present study identified patterns of safety climate change over time and examined the role of error disclosure climate and counterfactual sharing in relation to safety climate change patterns. Online surveys were administered in a Chinese hospital three times at approximately 1-month intervals; the final sample included 451 healthcare workers nested within 62 teams. A latent growth mixture modeling approach was adopted to identify representative patterns of safety climate change at both individual and team levels and the predictors of those patterns. Three patterns of safety climate trajectories, declining (16%), improving (39%), and maintaining (45%), were identified at the individual level. Positive error disclosure climate and counterfactual sharing were significantly associated with increased probability of membership in the improving and maintaining trajectories compared to the declining trajectories. Counterfactual sharing mediated the relation between error disclosure climate and membership of safety climate trajectories. At the team level, two patterns of safety climate change, declining (15%) and improving (85%), were identified. Team counterfactual sharing was significantly associated with increased probability of membership in the improving trajectories compared to the declining trajectories. The current study demonstrated that an open and non-judgmental culture and the practice of sharing errors can contribute to improving safety climate over time.
Corporate cultures. Turning "us versus them" into "we"

J L Sherer

1994-05-05

Abstract:Health care executives are coming around to the philosophy that shared values--and shared corporate culture--represent the number one success factor in any merger. In fact, studies have documented merger failures in cases in which corporate culture issues have been ignored. The question is: How can executives--and organizations--overcome the cultural obstacles?
How Doctors Talk About Medical Errors: A Qualitative Study of Junior Doctors' Experiences

Jane Ege Møller,Linda Marie Kai,Mads Skipper,Maja Bertz Hansen,Flemming Randsbæk,Signe Schlichting Matthiesen,Bente Vigh Malling

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241286037

IF: 4.233

2024-11-21

Qualitative Health Research

Abstract:Qualitative Health Research, Ahead of Print. During the last three decades, an increased amount of research on errors in health care has been conducted. Studies show that physicians find it challenging to handle errors because of the blame and guilt that errors cause. Communicating with colleagues has been identified as vital for coping with errors and for creating a just culture; however, many physicians do not usually discuss their errors. Knowledge about how junior doctors experience errors is vital to ensure that they both receive emotional support and learn from errors. To capture junior doctors' perceptions and experiences, we used a qualitative, exploratory design based on virtual focus groups. We conducted seven virtual focus groups with 22 junior doctors from 11 specialties. We defined three main themes: (1) how the junior doctors conceptualized medical errors, (2) how they experienced talk about errors among colleagues, and (3) the context in which this talk took place. The participants experienced errors as challenging elements in their working life; however, they struggled to define it. They described inconsistencies regarding the reasons for discussing errors within the learning environment, with some being experienced as constructive (providing education and support) and some as destructive (involving blame and shame). There was a discrepancy between the wish to normalize error and the lack of sharing between colleagues. Our study shows that error in health care is a complex phenomenon that challenges junior doctors' navigation in clinical practice. Despite efforts to implement an open and just culture, this has not yet been achieved.

social sciences, biomedical, interdisciplinary,information science & library science
Emotion and coping in the aftermath of medical error: a cross-country exploration

Reema Harrison,Rebecca Lawton,Jessica Perlo,Peter Gardner,Gerry Armitage,Jo Shapiro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182979b6f

Abstract:Objectives: Making a medical error can have serious implications for clinician well-being, affecting the quality and safety of patient care. Despite an advancing literature base, cross-country exploration of this experience is limited, and a paucity of studies has examined the coping strategies used by clinicians. A greater understanding of clinicians' responses to making an error, the factors that may influence these, and the various coping strategies used are all essential for providing effective clinician support and ensuring optimal outcomes.The objectives were therefore to investigate the following: a) the professional or personal disruption experienced after making an error, b) the emotional response and coping strategies used, c) the relationship between emotions and coping strategy selection, d) influential factors in clinicians' responses, and e) perceptions of organizational support. Methods: A cross-sectional, cross-country survey of 265 physicians and nurses was undertaken in 2 large teaching hospitals in the United Kingdom and the United States. Results: Professional and personal disruption was reported as a result of making an error. Negative emotions were common, but positive feelings of determination, attentiveness, and alertness were also identified. Emotional response and coping strategy selection did not differ because of location or perceived harm, but responses did appear to differ by professional group; nurses in both locations reported stronger negative feelings after an error. Respondents favored problem-focused coping strategies, and associations were identified between coping strategy selection and the presence of particular emotions. Organizational support services, particularly including peers, were recognized as helpful, but fears over confidentiality may prohibit some staff from accessing these. Conclusions: Clinicians in the United Kingdom and the United States experience professional and personal disruption after an error. A number of factors may influence clinician recovery; these factors should be considered in the provision of comprehensive support programs so as to improve clinician recovery and ensure higher quality, safer patient care.
What's needed next: a culture of candor

James O'Toole,Warren Bennis

Abstract:If there's one thing that the past decade's business disasters should teach us, it's that we need to stop evaluating corporate leaders simply on the basis of how much wealth they create for investors. A healthier yardstick would be this: the extent to which leaders create firms that are economically, ethically, and socially sustainable. The first step toward accomplishing that task is to create a culture of candor. Companies can't innovate, respond to stakeholder needs, or run efficiently unless the people inside them have access to timely, relevant information, point out professors O'Toole, of the University of Denver's Daniels College of Business, and Bennis, of the University of Southern California. Increasing transparency can be an uphill battle against human nature, however. The obstacles are numerous: macho executives who don't listen to their subordinates or punish them for bringing bad news; leaders who believe that information is power and hoard it; groupthink among team members who don't know how to disagree; boards that fail to question charismatic CEOs. Nevertheless, leaders can take steps to nurture transparency. By being open and candid, admitting their errors, encouraging employees to speak truth to power, and rewarding contrarians, executives can model the kind of conduct they want to see. Training employees to handle unpleasant conversations with grace also will break down barriers to honest communication. To avoid being blinded by biases, leaders can diversify their sources of information--an obvious measure that's rarely taken. Perhaps the biggest lever for cultural change is the executive selection process--choosing leaders for their transparent behavior, not just their ability to compete. And a few companies have even gone so far as to share all relevant information with every employee.
Let us talk about mistakes

Erich Sorantin,Michael Georg Grasser,Ariane Hemmelmayr,Sarah Heinze

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-06034-z

2024-09-02

Pediatric Radiology

Abstract:Unfortunately, errors and mistakes are part of life. Errors and mistakes can harm patients and incur unplanned costs. Errors may arise from various sources, which may be classified as systematic, latent, or active. Intrinsic and extrinsic factors also contribute to incorrect decisions. In addition to cognitive biases, our personality, socialization, personal chronobiology, and way of thinking (heuristic versus analytical) are influencing factors. Factors such as overload from private situations, long commuting times, and the complex environment of information technology must also be considered. The objective of this paper is to define and classify errors and mistakes in radiology, to discuss the influencing factors, and to present strategies for prevention. Hierarchical responsibilities and team "well-being" are also discussed.

pediatrics,radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
Individual and Team-Based Medical Error Disclosure: Dialectical Tensions Among Health Care Providers

Mandy Jones,Jennifer Scarduzio,Elzaba Mathews,Paula Holbrook,Darlene Welsh,Lee Wilbur,Douglas Carr,L. Curtis Cary,Christopher I. Doty,James A. Ballard

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319837224

IF: 4.233

2019-04-08

Qualitative Health Research

Abstract:Researchers from disciplines of education, health communication, law and risk management, medicine, nursing, and pharmacy examined communication tensions among interprofessional (IP) health care providers regarding medical error disclosure utilizing patient simulation. Using relational dialectics theory, we examined how communication tensions manifested in both individual-provided medical error disclosure and IP team-based disclosure. Two dialectical tensions that health care providers experienced in disclosure conversations were identified: (a) leadership and support, and (b) transparency and protectionism. Whereas these tensions were identified in an IP education setting using simulation, findings support the need for future research in clinical practice, which may inform best practices for various disclosure models. Identifying dialectical tensions in disclosure conversations may enable health communication experts to effectively engage health care providers, risk management, and patient care teams in terms of support and education related to communicating about medical errors.

social sciences, biomedical, interdisciplinary,information science & library science
Impact of Agents’ Errors on Performance, Reliance and Trust in Human-Agent Collaboration

Sylvain Daronnat,Leif Azzopardi,Martin Halvey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181320641091

2020-12-01

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting

Abstract:Trust in automation is often strongly tied to an agent’s performance. However, our understanding of imperfect agents’ behaviours and its impact on trust is limited. In this paper, we study the relationship between performance, reliance and trust in a set of human-agent collaborative tasks. Participants collaborated with different automated agents that performed similarly but made errors in different ways; namely mistakes (error of prioritization), lapses (error of omission) and slips (lowered accuracy). We conducted a 4x2 within-subjects experiment (n=24) varying the agent behaviours (no error, slips, mistakes and lapses) and task difficulty (easy/hard) during a real-time collaborative game. Our results show that, at the same level of agent performance, agents’ errors are perceived differently and change the way participants interact with agents. For instance, slips and mistakes are more harmful to performance than lapses while slips are more harmful to reliance than mistakes.
Error Aversion Versus Error Management: Does Organizational Error Culture Affect Employees’ Customer Orientation?

Demi Shenrui Deng,Hyun Jeong Kim,Hyounae (Kelly) Min,Jessica C. Murray

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480221088526

2022-04-11

Abstract:This study examines how two error cultures (error management and error aversion) influence customer-oriented behavior through negative affectivity and job satisfaction. We collected two samples: one for the error-aversive scale validation ( n = 140) and the other for the conceptual model ( n = 381). All responses are from contact employees working for mid-scale to luxury hotels in a metropolitan city in China. The findings reveal that mid-scale hotels are more error-averse than upscale hotels; upscale and luxury hotels are more inclined to error-management than mid-scale hotels. Further, error strains and error cover-up do not converge as lower-order constructs for error aversion; cover-up appears to be the truly opposite of error management. Cover-up along with strains decreases customer-oriented behavior through negative affectivity. In contrast, error management increases customer orientation through job satisfaction. This study contributes to the literature of organizational error culture by incorporating two opposite error cultures into the proposed model.

hospitality, leisure, sport & tourism
The impact of errors on healthcare professionals in the critical care setting

Amanpreet P Kaur,Andrew T Levinson,Joao Filipe G Monteiro,Gerardo P Carino

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.03.001

Abstract:Purpose: Medical errors occur at high rates in intensive care units (ICUs) and have great consequences. The impact of errors on healthcare professionals is rarely discussed. We hypothesized that issues regarding blame and guilt following errors in the ICU exist and may be dependent on type of practitioner, level of experience, and error type. Materials and methods: An online survey was conducted of members of a large critical care medical society addressing three clinical scenarios of procedural, diagnostic and treatment errors. Results: Nine hundred one practitioners responded. In all scenarios, negative feeling after medical errors occurred in all practitioners regardless of experience or field. Surgeons and anesthesiologists showed higher negative responses after procedural errors while internal medicine and emergency medicine practitioners had higher negative responses after diagnostic errors. Survey respondents identified multiple ways to address these adverse feelings, including debriefing with the medical team (68%), talking with colleagues (68%) and discussing with patients and families (36%). Conclusions: In critical care, blame and guilt after medical errors are common and affect all providers. Critical care practitioners have identified methods which may help mitigate adverse feeling after medical errors, including debriefing and talking with colleagues. Hospitals may benefit from developing these types of strategies after medical errors.
Taking the blame: appropriate responses to medical error

Daniel W Tigard

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2017-104687

2018-11-09

Journal of Medical Ethics

Abstract:Medical errors are all too common. Ever since a report issued by the Institute of Medicine raised awareness of this unfortunate reality, an emerging theme has gained prominence in the literature on medical error. Fears of blame and punishment, it is often claimed, allow errors to remain undisclosed. Accordingly, modern healthcare must shift away from blame towards a culture of safety in order to effectively reduce the occurrence of error. Against this shift, I argue that it would serve the medical community well to retain notions of individual responsibility and blame in healthcare settings. In particular, expressions of moral emotions—such as guilt, regret and remorse—appear to play an important role in the process of disclosing harmful errors to patients and families. While such self-blaming responses can have negative psychological effects on the individual practitioner, those who take the blame are in the best position to offer apologies and show that mistakes are being taken seriously, thereby allowing harmed patients and families to move forward in the wake of medical error.

ethics,medical ethics,social issues,social sciences, biomedical
Leveraging Consistent Communication Tools and Organizational Values to Promote Accountability Among Health Care Providers

Cynthia A Baldwin,Alice M Krumm

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aorn.14204

Abstract:Teamwork and effective communication between all health care staff members are essential to providing safe, high-quality patient care. High-reliability organizations align behavioral expectations with organizational values and prioritize safety over other performance metrics and pressures. Communication breakdowns, such as inadequate or incomplete information shared between caregivers, continues to be an issue that is linked to errors and staff member dissatisfaction. Initiatives to improve health care communication and improve patient outcomes are well documented, yet communication issues in the health care setting continue. An organization's credo defines its values and behavioral expectations. Educating team members on an organization's credo creates accountability among those teams to align their behavior with the organization's values, policies, and professional commitment. A Coworker Observation Reporting System offers a communication method for providing meaningful feedback on behaviors inconsistent with an organization's credo.
Tolerating errors in hospitality organizations: relationships with learning behavior, error reporting and service recovery performance

Xingyu Wang,Priyanko Guchait,Aysin Paşamehmetoğlu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-01-2020-0001

IF: 9.321

2020-07-04

International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management

Abstract:Purpose Hospitality work setting is error-prone, rendering error handling critical for effective organizational operation and quality of service delivery. An organization’s attitude toward errors can be traced back to one fundamental question: should errors be tolerated/accepted or not? This study aims to examine the relationships between error tolerance and hospitality employees’ three critical work behaviors, namely, learning behavior, error reporting and service recovery performance. Psychological safety and self-efficacy are hypothesized to be the underlying attitudinal mechanisms that link error tolerance with these behavioral outcomes. Design/methodology/approach This study relied on a survey methodology, collecting data from 304 frontline restaurant employees in Turkey and their direct supervisors. SPSS 25.0 and Amos 25.0 were used for analysis. Findings The results revealed that error tolerance had direct positive relationships with employees’ psychological safety and self-efficacy, both of which had positive impacts on learning behavior and error reporting. In addition, learning behavior positively influenced employees’ service recovery performance, as rated by the employees’ supervisors. Originality/value This study identifies error tolerance as an organizational distal factor that influences employees’ learning behavior, error reporting and service recovery performance; and identifies self-efficacy and psychological safety as mediators of the relationship between error tolerance and behavioral outcomes. The findings help clarify the longstanding debate over the relationship between an organization’s attitude toward errors and its employees’ learning behavior. The findings also shed light on the advantages of tolerating error occurrence for organizations, which is especially important as most hospitality organizations pursue perfection with aversive attitudes toward errors.

management,hospitality, leisure, sport & tourism

Sharing Errors Where Everyone Is Perfect—Culture, Emotional Dynamics, and Error Sharing in Two Consulting Firms

How Does Knowledge Sharing among Advisors from Different Disciplines Affect the Quality of the Services Provided to the Family Business Client? an Investigation from the Family Business Advisor’s Perspective

Learn to build an error management culture

Error reframing: studying the promotion of an error management culture

Learning From Each Other: How Are Architectural Mistakes Communicated in Industry?

Confronting failure: antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups

The profitable art of service recovery

Social Outcomes of Leader Covering up Errors for Employee: A Relational Identification Perspective

Error Disclosure Climate and Safety Climate Trajectories: the Mediating Role of Counterfactual Sharing

Corporate cultures. Turning "us versus them" into "we"

How Doctors Talk About Medical Errors: A Qualitative Study of Junior Doctors' Experiences

Emotion and coping in the aftermath of medical error: a cross-country exploration

What's needed next: a culture of candor

Let us talk about mistakes

Individual and Team-Based Medical Error Disclosure: Dialectical Tensions Among Health Care Providers

Impact of Agents’ Errors on Performance, Reliance and Trust in Human-Agent Collaboration

Error Aversion Versus Error Management: Does Organizational Error Culture Affect Employees’ Customer Orientation?

The impact of errors on healthcare professionals in the critical care setting

Taking the blame: appropriate responses to medical error

Leveraging Consistent Communication Tools and Organizational Values to Promote Accountability Among Health Care Providers

Tolerating errors in hospitality organizations: relationships with learning behavior, error reporting and service recovery performance