Abstract:Advances in Health Sciences Education (AHSE) has been at the forefront of the cognitive wave in health professions education for the past 25 years. One example is research on productive failure, a teaching strategy that asks learners to attempt to generate solutions to difficult problems before receiving instruction. This study compared the effectiveness of productive failure with indirect failure to further characterize the underpinning cognitive mechanisms of productive failure. Year one pharmacy students (N = 42) were randomly assigned to a productive failure or an indirect failure learning condition. The problem of estimating renal function based on serum creatinine was described to participants in the productive failure learning condition, who were then asked to generate a solution. Participants in the indirect failure condition learned about the same problem and were given incorrect solutions that other students had created, as well as the Cockcroft–Gault formula, and asked to compare and contrast the equations. Immediately thereafter all participants completed a series of tests designed to assess acquisition, application, and preparation for future learning (PFL). The tests were repeated after a 1-week delay. Participants in the productive failure condition outperformed those in the indirect failure condition, both on the immediate PFL assessment, and after a 1-week delay. These results emphasize the crucial role of generation in learning. When preparing novice students to learn new knowledge in the future, generating solutions to problems prior to instruction may be more effective than simply learning about someone else's mistakes. Struggle and failure are most productive when experienced personally by a learner because it requires the learner to engage in generation, which deepens conceptual understanding.

Confronting failure: antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups

Creativity is Allowing for Failures: Leader Failure Tolerance and Employee Creativity

Entrepreneurial failure, learning from the failure and new venturing performance

Exploring the Influence of Failure Aversion on Learning From Project Failure: A Sensemaking Perspective

FAIL Is Not a Four-Letter Word: A Theoretical Framework for Exploring Undergraduate Students’ Approaches to Academic Challenge and Responses to Failure in STEM Learning Environments

How does team learning from failure facilitate new product performance? The double-edged moderating effect of collective efficacy

Effects on and consequences of responses to errors: Results from two experimental studies

Interactions between the context of a health-care organisation and failure: the situational impact of failure on organisational learning

Lessons in Failure: Applying an Organizational Learning Framework to Understanding Attitudes Towards Failure in Development

Understand Failure for Effort Deficit in Competitions:Learned Helplessness in Sport

Learning from failure: The roles of self-focused feedback, task expectations, and subsequent instruction.

What experiences constitute failures? High school students' reflections on their struggles in STEM classes

Learning From Lessons Learned: Preliminary Findings From a Study of Learning From Failure

The Lessons We (Don't) Learn: Counterfactual Thinking and Organizational Accountability after a Close Call

Learning from errors and failure in educational contexts: New insights and future directions for research and practice

Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams

I Am as Incompetent as the Prototypical Group Member: An Investigation of Naturally Occurring Golem Effects in Work Groups

ATTRIBUTIONS TO FAILURE: THE EFFECTS OF EFFORT, ABILITY, AND LEARNING STRATEGY USE ON PERCEPTIONS OF FUTURE GOALS AND EMOTIONAL RESPONSES

Tolerating and Managing Failure: An Organizational Perspective on Customer Reacquisition Management

Exploring why we learn from productive failure: insights from the cognitive and learning sciences

How to Induce an Error Management Climate: Experimental Evidence from Newly Formed Teams