Military Carbon Emissions
Nadia B. Ahmad,Nadia Ahmad
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4553318
2023-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:“We need to cut the [P]entagon budget and invest in communities.” – U.S. Congressman Maxwell Alejandro Frost On March 11, 2023, the third anniversary of the World Health Organization’s declaration of a global pandemic, Generation Z’s first member of Congress, Maxwell Alejandro Frost, tweeted that the Pentagon budget should be reduced to invest in local communities. Representative Frost’s argument that funds should be reinvested in local communities is both economic and moral. National security interests in Pentagon spending affected the way communities received funding. By presenting this economic argument, he also expanded demilitarization’s social justice and humanitarian dimensions. Following the emergence of the Black Lives Matter movement, defunding the police has gained traction, but coalition-building around demilitarization has been a more tenuous process. In this Article, I contend that U.S. military carbon emissions should be included when calculating the carbon footprint and determining how to respond to a carbon crisis. Representative Frost has identified several areas of concern in his policy positions, including the reduction of gun violence, pandemic preparedness, the climate crisis, reimagining justice, housing and transit, and healthcare. Not only did he call for a reduction in defense expenditures, but also called for a redistribution of those funds to communities in general. While others have acknowledged the connection between climate change and national security, I support Represenative Frost’s more radical understanding of the impact on national security and defense expenditures in his tweet. Furthermore, I contend that defense expenditure serves as a catalyst for climate change and is accountable for the deterioration of the U.S. worldwide position of influence and impact.Military carbon emissions have been overlooked in discussions of climate change and environmental policies. Carbon dioxide emissions constitute a substantial proportion of global greenhouse gas emissions, thereby playing a role in climate change and its related consequences. In this Article, I argue that demilitarization, the process of reducing the size, scope, and influence of armed forces, can have far-reaching impacts on decarbonization and economic development. This Article aims to examine the correlation between carbon emissions generated by the military, the process of demilitarization, and the significance of military carbon emissions in the context of decarbonization and endeavors towards just economic development. I support the proposition put forward by UK-based scholars Mohammad Ali Rajaeifar, Oliver Belcher, Stuart Parkinson, Benjamin Neimark, Doug Weir, Kristi Ashworth, Rueben Larbi and Oliver Heinrich in the need to mandate emissions reporting for the world’s military. I focus on my own government’s need to account and keep track of its military carbon emissions.