How Reproducible are Surface Areas Calculated from the BET Equation?
Johannes W. M. Osterrieth,James Rampersad,David Madden,Nakul Rampal,Luka Skoric,Bethany Connolly,Mark D. Allendorf,Vitalie Stavila,Jonathan L. Snider,Rob Ameloot,João Marreiros,Conchi Ania,Diana Azevedo,Enrique Vilarrasa‐Garcia,Bianca F. Santos,Xian‐He Bu,Ze Chang,Hana Bunzen,Neil R. Champness,Sarah L. Griffin,Banglin Chen,Rui‐Biao Lin,Benoit Coasne,Seth Cohen,Jessica C. Moreton,Yamil J. Colón,Linjiang Chen,Rob Clowes,François‐Xavier Coudert,Yong Cui,Bang Hou,Deanna M. D'Alessandro,Patrick W. Doheny,Mircea Dincă,Chenyue Sun,Christian Doonan,Michael Thomas Huxley,Jack D. Evans,Paolo Falcaro,Raffaele Ricco,Omar Farha,Karam B. Idrees,Timur Islamoglu,Pingyun Feng,Huajun Yang,Ross S. Forgan,Dominic Bara,Shuhei Furukawa,Eli Sanchez,Jorge Gascon,Selvedin Telalović,Sujit K. Ghosh,Soumya Mukherjee,Matthew R. Hill,Muhammed Munir Sadiq,Patricia Horcajada,Pablo Salcedo‐Abraira,Katsumi Kaneko,Radovan Kukobat,Jeff Kenvin,Seda Keskin,Susumu Kitagawa,Ken‐ichi Otake,Ryan P. Lively,Stephen J. A. DeWitt,Phillip Llewellyn,Bettina V. Lotsch,Sebastian T. Emmerling,Alexander M. Pütz,Carlos Martí‐Gastaldo,Natalia M. Padial,Javier García‐Martínez,Noemi Linares,Daniel Maspoch,Jose A. Suárez del Pino,Peyman Moghadam,Rama Oktavian,Russel E. Morris,Paul S. Wheatley,Jorge Navarro,Camille Petit,David Danaci,Matthew J. Rosseinsky,Alexandros P. Katsoulidis,Martin Schröder,Xue Han,Sihai Yang,Christian Serre,Georges Mouchaham,David S. Sholl,Raghuram Thyagarajan,Daniel Siderius,Randall Q. Snurr,Rebecca B. Goncalves,Shane Telfer,Seok J. Lee,Valeska P. Ting,Jemma L. Rowlandson,Takashi Uemura,Tomoya Iiyuka,Monique A. Veen,Davide Rega,Veronique Van Speybroeck,Sven M. J. Rogge,Aran Lamaire,Krista S. Walton,Lukas W. Bingel,Stefan Wuttke,Jacopo Andreo,Omar Yaghi,Bing Zhang,Cafer T. Yavuz,Thien S. Nguyen,Felix Zamora,Carmen Montoro,Hongcai Zhou,Angelo Kirchon,David Fairen‐Jimenez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202201502
IF: 29.4
2022-05-24
Advanced Materials
Abstract:A round‐robin study involving 61 labs is performed, and it is shown that the determination of Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) areas from identical isotherms is a largely ignored issue. To solve this, a new computational approach called "BET surface identification" (BETSI) is presented, which expands on the Rouquerol criteria, and which makes an unambiguous BET area calculation possible. Porosity and surface area analysis play a prominent role in modern materials science. At the heart of this sits the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) theory, which has been a remarkably successful contribution to the field of materials science. The BET method was developed in the 1930s for open surfaces but is now the most widely used metric for the estimation of surface areas of micro‐ and mesoporous materials. Despite its widespread use, the calculation of BET surface areas causes a spread in reported areas, resulting in reproducibility problems in both academia and industry. To prove this, for this analysis, 18 already‐measured raw adsorption isotherms were provided to sixty‐one labs, who were asked to calculate the corresponding BET areas. This round‐robin exercise resulted in a wide range of values. Here, the reproducibility of BET area determination from identical isotherms is demonstrated to be a largely ignored issue, raising critical concerns over the reliability of reported BET areas. To solve this major issue, a new computational approach to accurately and systematically determine the BET area of nanoporous materials is developed. The software, called "BET surface identification" (BETSI), expands on the well‐known Rouquerol criteria and makes an unambiguous BET area assignment possible.
materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,physics, applied, condensed matter,nanoscience & nanotechnology