Abstract:Background Recent studies have shown that, owning to its cohesive cleavage, Cas9-mediated CRISPR gene editing outcomes at junctions of chromosomal rearrangements or DNA-fragment editing are precise and predictable; however, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood due to lack of suitable assay system and analysis tool.Results Here we developed a customized computer program to take account of staggered or cohesive Cas9 cleavage and to rapidly process large volumes of junctional sequencing reads from chromosomal rearrangements or DNA-fragment editing, including DNA-fragment inversions, duplications, and deletions. We also established a sensitive assay system using HPRT1 and DCK as reporters for cell growth during DNA-fragment editing by Cas9 with dual sgRNAs and found prominent large resections or long deletions at junctions of chromosomal rearrangements. In addition, we found that knockdown of PolQ (encoding Pol theta polymerase), which has a prominent role in theta-mediated end joining (TMEJ) or microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ), results in increased large resections but decreased small deletions. We also found that the mechanisms for generating small deletions of 1bp and >1bp during DNA-fragment editing are different with regard to their opposite dependencies on Pol theta and Pol lambda (encoded by the PolL gene). Specifically, Pol theta suppresses 1bp deletions but promotes >1bp deletions, whereas Pol lambda promotes 1bp deletions but suppresses >1bp deletions. Finally, we found that Pol lambda is the main DNA polymerase responsible for fill-in of the 5 ' overhangs of staggered Cas9 cleavage ends.Conclusions These findings contribute to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated DNA-fragment editing and have important implications for controllable, precise, and predictable gene editing.

Large DNA deletions occur during DNA repair at 20-fold lower frequency for base editors and prime editors than for Cas9 nucleases

Detailed mechanisms for unintended large DNA deletions with CRISPR, base editors, and prime editors

CRISPR/Cas9 Targeting Events Cause Complex Deletions and Insertions at 17 Sites in the Mouse Genome

Harnessing accurate non-homologous end joining for efficient precise deletion in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing

DNA Polymerases in Precise and Predictable CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Chromosomal Rearrangements

Effective control of large deletions after double-strand breaks by homology-directed repair and dsODN insertion

Precise genomic deletions using paired prime editing

Precise and Predictable CRISPR Chromosomal Rearrangements Reveal Principles of Cas9-Mediated Nucleotide Insertion

Altered DNA repair pathway engagement by engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases

Target Interaction of Cas9-sgRNA Influences DNA Double Strand Break Repair Pathway Choices in CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing

C-to-G editing generates double-strand breaks causing deletion, transversion and translocation

Cell cycle arrest combined with CDK1 inhibition suppresses genome-wide mutations by activating alternative DNA repair genes during genome editing

Quantitative analysis shows that repair of Cas9-induced double-strand DNA breaks is slow and error-prone

The interplay of DNA repair context with target sequence predictably biases Cas9-generated mutations

Precision genome editing using synthesis-dependent repair of Cas9-induced DNA breaks

Comprehensive analysis and accurate quantification of unintended large gene modifications induced by CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing

Modulation of the microhomology-mediated end joining pathway suppresses large deletions and enhances homology-directed repair following CRISPR-Cas9-induced DNA breaks

Precise large-fragment deletions in mammalian cells and mice generated by dCas9-controlled CRISPR/Cas3

Global Detection of DNA Repair Outcomes Induced by CRISPR-Cas9

Optimizing genome editing strategy by primer-extension-mediated sequencing

CRISPR/Cas9 systems have off-target activity with insertions or deletions between target DNA and guide RNA sequences