Abstract:Significance Statement Cas12a becomes more popular for plant genome editing, but detailed repair footprint analysis is lacking. Here we show that Cas12a functions as efficiently as Cas9 with repair profiles reflecting similar contributions from NHEJ and TMEJ. The main difference is the absence of 1 bp insertions in Cas12a repair profiles, which result from DNA Polymerase Lambda action. Cas12a‐induced DSBs, like Cas9‐induced DSBs, are also entry sites for T‐DNA integration. SUMMARY With the advancement of CRISPR technologies, a comprehensive understanding of repair mechanisms following double‐strand break (DSB) formation is important for improving the precision and efficiency of genetic modifications. In plant genetics, two Cas nucleases are widely used, i.e. Cas9 and Cas12a, which differ with respect to PAM sequence composition, position of the DSB relative to the PAM, and DSB‐end configuration (blunt vs. staggered). The latter difference has led to speculations about different options for repair and recombination. Here, we provide detailed repair profiles for LbCas12a in Arabidopsis thaliana, using identical experimental settings previously reported for Cas9‐induced DSBs, thus allowing for a quantitative comparison of both nucleases. For both enzymes, non‐homologous end‐joining (NHEJ) produces 70% of mutations, whereas polymerase theta‐mediated end‐joining (TMEJ) generates 30%, indicating that DSB‐end configuration does not dictate repair pathway choice. Relevant for genome engineering approaches aimed at integrating exogenous DNA, we found that Cas12a similarly stimulates the integration of T‐DNA molecules as does Cas9. Long‐read sequencing of both Cas9 and Cas12a repair outcomes further revealed a previously underappreciated degree of DNA loss upon TMEJ. The most notable disparity between Cas9 and Cas12a repair profiles is caused by how NHEJ acts on DSB ends with short overhangs: non‐symmetric Cas9 cleavage produce 1 bp insertions, which we here show to depend on polymerase Lambda, whereas staggered Cas12a DSBs are not subjected to fill‐in synthesis. We conclude that Cas9 and Cas12a are equally effective for genome engineering purposes, offering flexibility in nuclease choice based on the availability of compatible PAM sequences.

Quantitative analysis shows that repair of Cas9-induced double-strand DNA breaks is slow and error-prone

Target Interaction of Cas9-sgRNA Influences DNA Double Strand Break Repair Pathway Choices in CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing

Target Binding and Residence: a New Determinant of DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Pathway Choice in CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing

Target residence of Cas9: challenges and opportunities in genome editing

DNA Repair Pathway Choices in CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing

Analysis of NHEJ-Based DNA Repair after CRISPR-Mediated DNA Cleavage

Target residence of Cas9-sgRNA influences DNA double-strand break repair pathway choices in CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing

Harnessing accurate non-homologous end joining for efficient precise deletion in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing

The interplay of DNA repair context with target sequence predictably biases Cas9-generated mutations

Programmable DNA Repair with CRISPRa/i Enhanced Homology-Directed Repair Efficiency with a Single Cas9

CAS9 is a genome mutator by directly disrupting DNA-PK dependent DNA repair pathway

Profiling Cas9‐ and Cas12a‐induced mutagenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana

A CRISPR-Cas9-based system for the dose-dependent study of DNA double strand breaks sensing and repair

Large DNA deletions occur during DNA repair at 20-fold lower frequency for base editors and prime editors than for Cas9 nucleases

DNA Polymerases in Precise and Predictable CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Chromosomal Rearrangements

Mapping the Genetic Landscape of DNA Double-strand Break Repair

A robust CRISPR-Cas9-based fluorescent reporter assay for the detection and quantification of DNA double-strand break repair

Linking CRISPR–Cas9 double-strand break profiles to gene editing precision with BreakTag

Proximal binding of dCas9 at a DNA double strand break stimulates homology-directed repair as a local inhibitor of classical non-homologous end joining

Methods Favoring Homology-Directed Repair Choice in Response to CRISPR/Cas9 Induced-Double Strand Breaks

Global Detection of DNA Repair Outcomes Induced by CRISPR-Cas9