Abstract:Purpose Academic scholars have leveraged crowd work platforms such as Amazon Mechanical Turk for human subjects research for almost two decades. However, few scholars have reflected or questioned this mode of academic research. This paper aims to examine three fundamental problems of crowd work and elaborates on their lasting effects on impacting the validity and quality of human subjects research on crowd work. Design/methodology/approach` A critical analysis is conducted on the characteristics of crowd work, and three fundamental problems of crowd work since its origin were identified, namely, the position of "Human-as-a-service," the confusion of terminology and crowd work platforms' abdication of responsibilities. Findings This paper explains that the three identified fundamental problems of crowd work render at least two lasting problems in crowd work-based research: first, the negligence of the teleological difference between crowd work and academic research; second, the ontological schism between scholars and institutional review boards (IRBs) in their ethical concerns and practices. Originality/value This paper critiques the foundation of crowd work-based research that has become growingly popular, extolled and taken for granted. Such a critique is deficient in literature and may seem a bit peculiar. However, we hold that it is time to take research ethics seriously in crowd work because we need to introspect and question ourselves as scholars: What is our motive or ethical stance in using crowd work for human subjects research? Is it for advancing scientific knowledge, promoting crowd workers' welfare, or predominantly for benefiting ourselves from the fast, cheap and "good" data via crowd work?

Privacy in Crowdsourcing: a Review of the Threats and Challenges

"Our Privacy Needs to Be Protected at All Costs"

Key Research Issues and Related Technologies in Crowdsourcing Data Collection

Connecting Human to Cyber World: Security and Privacy Issues in Mobile Crowdsourcing Networks

The original sin of crowd work for human subjects research

Security and privacy in mobile crowdsourcing networks: challenges and opportunities.

“Our Privacy Needs to Be Protected Equally As Everybody's”—A Preliminary Study of Crowdsourced Delivery Riders' Privacy Concerns in China

Tragedy of the Commons in Crowd Work-Based Research

Privacy in Socially Intelligent Computing User awareness study, Implications for existing platforms, Recommendations and Research Directions

Optimal Task Recommendation for Mobile Crowdsourcing with Privacy Control

Tragedy of the Commons - A Critical Study of Data Quality and Validity Issues in Crowd Work-Based Research

Privacy-Preserving Task Recommendation Services for Crowdsourcing

Crowdsourcing Consumer Research

Two Ethical Dilemmas in Conducting Human Subjects Research on Amazon Mechanical Turk (Mturk)

Blockchain-based Privacy-preserving Crowdsourcing Scheme

Privacy-Preserving Task-Matching and Multiple-Submissions Detection in Crowdsourcing

On (The Lack Of) Location Privacy in Crowdsourcing Applications

Access Control Model Based on the Privacy of Crowdsourcing Task Content Protection in the Blockchain Environment

When Mobile Crowdsensing Meets Privacy

A Real-Time Privacy Monitoring System for Multi-Tasks-Based Privacy-Disclosure in Crowdsourcing

Privacy-preserving worker allocation in crowdsourcing