Abstract:Crowdsensing has been recognized as a promising data collection paradigm, in which a platform outsources sensing tasks to a large number of users. However, requesting users to report raw data may give rise to many practical concerns, such as a significant overhead of communication and central processing, besides users' privacy concerns. In many scenarios (e.g, advertising and recommendation), the data collector directly benefits from statistical aggregation of raw data. Thus motivated, we consider the data collection problem based on user's local histograms, which is intimately related to the fundamental trade-off between the platform's accuracy and users' privacy. Because of users' social relationship, their data are often correlated, indicating that users' privacy may be leaked from others' data. To tackle this challenge, we first utilize Gaussian Markov random fields to model the correlation structure embedded in users' data. The data collection is modeled as a Stackelberg game where the platform decides its reward policy and users decide their noise levels while taking into account the social coupling among users. For the reward policy design, we first establish the relationship between users' Nash equilibrium and the payment mechanism, and then optimize the platform's accuracy under a budget constraint. Further, since the noise levels are users' private information, they may use falsified noise levels to achieve higher payoffs, which in turn impairs the crowdsensing performance. It turns out that with the insight into the correlation structure among users' data, the information asymmetry can be overcome based on peer prediction. We revisit the payment mechanism to guarantee dominant truthfulness of each user's strategy. Theoretical analysis and numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed mechanism.

Tragedy of the Commons - A Critical Study of Data Quality and Validity Issues in Crowd Work-Based Research

Tragedy of the Commons in Crowd Work-Based Research

The original sin of crowd work for human subjects research

What Scholars and IRBs Talk when They Talk about the Belmont Principles in Crowd Work-Based Research

Undue Influence or Exploitation — A Qualitative Inquiry into an Ethical Dilemma Around Payment in Crowd Work-Based Research in the U.S.

Privacy in Crowdsourcing: a Review of the Threats and Challenges

Resolving the Human Subjects Status of Machine Learning's Crowdworkers

"Our Privacy Needs to Be Protected at All Costs"

Two Ethical Dilemmas in Conducting Human Subjects Research on Amazon Mechanical Turk (Mturk)

Crowdsourcing Consumer Research

Beyond Fair Pay: Ethical Implications of NLP Crowdsourcing

The Burden for High-Quality Online Data Collection Lies With Researchers, Not Recruitment Platforms

CrowdWorkSheets: Accounting for Individual and Collective Identities Underlying Crowdsourced Dataset Annotation

Key Research Issues and Related Technologies in Crowdsourcing Data Collection

Socially Privacy-Preserving Data Collection for Crowdsensing

An MTurk Crisis? Shifts in Data Quality and the Impact on Study Results

Voices of Workers: Why a Worker-Centered Approach to Crowd Work Is Challenging

Aoir ethics panel 2: platform challenges

Crowdsourced data in public administration research: A review and look to the future

Data Quality in Crowdsourcing and Spamming Behavior Detection

Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research