Abstract:Crowdsourcing offers a new way for mobilizing the collective intelligence and efforts of a large group of people to tackle tasks which cannot be efficiently performed by machines (e.g., video transcription, monitoring road conditions at specific locations) (Doan, Ramakrishnan, and Halevy 2011). Many commercial crowdsourcing platforms are now available. Their business depends on providing satisfactory services to both the crowdsourcers (i.e. task requesters) and the workers involved. From the crowdsourcers' perspective, they expect to receive high quality results for their crowd sourcing tasks in a timely manner. From the workers' perspective, they want to earn as much as possible while committing limited productive effort.As the crowdsourcers are the main source of revenue for crowdsourcing platforms, their requirements tend to take precedence over those of the workers. Many commercial crowdsourcing platforms have implemented some variants of reputation-based mechanisms (Yu et al. 2013a) to gauge the workers' competence based on their past performance, and allow only those with good reputations to access tasks.While this simple reputation-based task delegation method is intuitive and has its own merits, a different, albeit related problem, has not received much attention. As crowd sourcing workers are human beings, they have limited availability and productive capacities to work on tasks delegated to them (Yu et al. 2012). Concentrating requests to workers with good reputations may result in details. In addition, as a small portion of reputable workers become overloaded with task requests while others remain relatively idle, attrition may occur in the worker population, thereby leaving the crowdsourcing platform with a shortage of workers.The potentially conflicting objectives between crowdsourcers and workers can be formalized under the congestion game framework (Monderer and Shapley 1996). In congestion games, the payoff for each player depends on the resources it selects and the number of other players selecting the same resources. For instance, the morning commute to work places by many people can be modeled as a congestion game. The time taken by a traveller on a given day depends on how many others are taking the same route as him.

The original sin of crowd work for human subjects research

Tragedy of the Commons in Crowd Work-Based Research

Tragedy of the Commons - A Critical Study of Data Quality and Validity Issues in Crowd Work-Based Research

Undue Influence or Exploitation — A Qualitative Inquiry into an Ethical Dilemma Around Payment in Crowd Work-Based Research in the U.S.

What Scholars and IRBs Talk when They Talk about the Belmont Principles in Crowd Work-Based Research

Resolving the Human Subjects Status of Machine Learning's Crowdworkers

When the Automated Fire Backfires: the Adoption of Algorithm-based HR Decision-making Could Induce Consumer's Unfavorable Ethicality Inferences of the Company

Two Ethical Dilemmas in Conducting Human Subjects Research on Amazon Mechanical Turk (Mturk)

Beyond Fair Pay: Ethical Implications of NLP Crowdsourcing

Privacy in Crowdsourcing: a Review of the Threats and Challenges

What do crowd workers think about creative work?

Crowd work with or without crowdsourcing platforms

"Our Privacy Needs to Be Protected at All Costs"

Beyond AMT: An Analysis of Crowd Work Platforms

Voices of Workers: Why a Worker-Centered Approach to Crowd Work Is Challenging

Online Decision Making in Crowdsourcing Markets: Theoretical Challenges (Position Paper)

The Nature of Crowd Work and its Effects on Individuals’ Work Perception

Crowdsourcing Consumer Research

CrowdWorkSheets: Accounting for Individual and Collective Identities Underlying Crowdsourced Dataset Annotation

Infusing Human Factors Into Algorithmic Crowdsourcing

Investigating Crowdworkers' Identify, Perception and Practices in Micro-Task Crowdsourcing