Abstract:Phenomenon: Professionalism is integral to the role of the physician. Most professionalism assessments in medical training are delayed until clinical rotations where multisource feedback is available. This leaves a gap in student assessment portfolios and potentially delays professional development. Approach: A total of 246 second-year medical students (2013-2015) completed self- and peer assessments of professional behaviors in 2 courses following a series of Team-Based Learning exercises. Correlation and regression analyses were used to examine the alignment or misalignment in the relationship between the 2 types of assessments. Four subgroups were formed based on observed patterns of initial self- and peer assessment alignment or misalignment, and subgroup membership stability over time was assessed. A missing data analysis examined differences between average peer assessment scores as a function of selective nonparticipation. Findings: Spearman correlation demonstrated moderate to strong correlation between self-assessments completed alone (no simultaneous peer assessment) and self-assessments completed at the time of peer assessments ( = .59, p < .0001) but weak correlation between the two self-assessments and peer assessments (alone: = .13, p < .013; at time of peer: = .21, p < .0001). Generalized estimating equation models revealed that self-assessments done alone (p < .0001) were a significant predictor of self-assessments done at the time of peer. Course was also a significant predictor (p = .01) of self-assessment scores done at the time of peer. Peer assessment score was not a significant predictor. Bhapkar's test revealed subgroup membership based on the relationship between self- and peer ratings was relatively stable across Time 1 and Time 2 assessments ((2) = 0.83, p = .84) for all but one subgroup; members of the subgroup with initially high self-assessment and low peer assessment were significantly more likely to move to a new classification at the second measurement. A missing data analysis revealed that students who completed all self-assessments had significantly higher average peer assessment ratings compared to students who completed one or no self-assessments with a difference of -0.32, 95% confidence interval [-0.48, -0.15]. Insights: Multiple measurements of simultaneous self- and peer assessment identified a subgroup of students who consistently rated themselves higher on professionalism attributes relative to the low ratings given by their peers. This subgroup of preclinical students, along with those who elected to not complete self-assessments, may be at risk for professionalism concerns. Use of this multisource feedback tool to measure perceptual stability of professionalism behaviors is a new approach that may assist with early identification of at-risk students during preclinical years.

PEER ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT TEAMWORK: CASE STUDIES INVOLVING MULTICULTURAL PROJECT-BASED LEARNING

Chinese Efl Students' Attitudes To Peer Feedback and Peer Assessment in an Extended Pairwork Setting

An Empirical Study of the Impact of Peer Assessment on Teamwork from the Perspective of Experiential FL Teaching and Learning

Who engaged in the team-based assessment? Leveraging EdTech for a self and intra-team peer-assessment solution to free-riding

Peer assessment of contributions and learning processes in group projects: an analysis of information technology undergraduate students’ performance

Peer assessment, self-assessment, and resultant feedback: an examination of feasibility and reliability

A Novel Approach to Assessing Professionalism in Preclinical Medical Students Using Multisource Feedback Through Paired Self- and Peer Evaluations

The effects of peer judgements on teamwork and self-assessment ability in collaborative group work

Peer Evaluation Instrument Development, Administration, and Assessment in a Team-based Learning Curriculum

Effects of Interaction between Peer Assessment and Problem-Solving Tendencies on Students’ Learning Achievements and Collaboration in Mobile Technology-Supported Project-Based Learning

Influence of Culture on Chinese University Students' Interaction with Feedback

Gender bias in team-building activities in China

Using a Web-Based System to Explore Peer, Self, and Tutor Assessment in Problem-Based Learning Tutorials

Responding to student feedback Individualising teamwork scores based on peer assessment

International-Domestic Student Differences in Learning: Use of Classroom Response Systems in China Versus in Canada

Student satisfaction with use of an online peer feedback system

Nature and Quality of Interactions Between Elementary School Children Using Video-Modeling and Peer-to-Peer Evaluation With and Without Structured Video Feedback

Student attitudes that predict participation in peer assessment

Peer assessment in a project-based engineering course: comparing between on-campus and online learning environments

Assessment as Learning: How Does Peer Assessment Function in Students' Learning?

Interactive Learning with Student Response System to Encourage Students to Provide Peer Feedback