Abstract:Objectives: The purpose of this research was to evaluate the use of online peer evaluation forms for online group activities in improving group project outcomes. Design: The investigator developed and used a web-based Google Forms® self and peer evaluation form of 2 group assignments' rubric for junior and senior nursing students. The form covered elements of the assignments including: research activity, analysis of the literature, writing of report, participation in making of presentation, overall contribution to the project, and participation in the weekly group discussions. Items were rated from 1 (did not contribute) to 5 (outstanding contribution) in addition to NA when one activity did not apply. Procedure: The self and peer evaluation process was conducted twice: once after group assignment 1 and once after group assignment 2. The group assignments final products were done in the form of VoiceThread online presentations that were shared with the rest of the class reflecting the groups' work on a health informatics topic of interest. Data sources: Data collected as the students completed self and peer evaluations for group assignments 1 and 2. Also, optional comments regarding member performance were collected to add contextual information in addition to ratings. Students received credit for completing the peer evaluations and the grade for the particular assignment was affected by their performance based on peer evaluations of their contributions. Results: Students' peer evaluations showed in a color-coded spreadsheet which enabled the course faculty to view real time results of students' ratings after each assignment. The faculty provided timely and tailored feedback to groups or individuals as needed, using positive feedback and commending high performance while urging struggling individual students and groups to improve lower ratings in specific areas. Comparing evaluations of both assignments, there were statistically significant improvements among all students. The mean scores of the entire sample were skewed toward the higher end of the scale, suggesting an overall high performance group. However, analysis of the lower performing individuals showed consistent and statistically significant improvements in all areas of the evaluation criteria. Conclusions: Anonymous peer evaluation activities and timely faculty feedback in e-Learning environment can be a useful tool to faculty to improve group performance over time by engaging the learners within their groups. Peer evaluations provided real time view of group mid-semester formative evaluations that allowed the faculty to provide timely and tailored feedback on student performance which allowed for better outcomes.

Peer Evaluation Instrument Development, Administration, and Assessment in a Team-based Learning Curriculum

A Three-Year Study on Peer Evaluation in a Software Engineering Project Course

Using Continuous Peer Evaluation in Team-Based Engineering Capstone Projects: A Case Study

Validity and reliability assessment of a peer evaluation method in team-based learning classes

Peer assessment, self-assessment, and resultant feedback: an examination of feasibility and reliability

Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment

Peer assessment of professional competence

Collaborative Peer Evaluation: Best Practices for Group Member Assessments

The effects of peer judgements on teamwork and self-assessment ability in collaborative group work

Learning in teams: peer evaluation for fair assessment of individual contributions

Effects of Behavioral Anchors on Peer Evaluation Reliability

A Faculty Growth Perspective on Peer Review of Teaching: An Institution-Wide, Customizable Approach to Peer Review

Peer assessment of contributions and learning processes in group projects: an analysis of information technology undergraduate students’ performance

Design and pilot implementation of an evaluation tool assessing professionalism, communication and collaboration during a unique global health elective

Dynamic online peer evaluations to improve group assignments in nursing e-learning environment

Peer review in team-based learning: influencing feedback literacy

Responding to student feedback Individualising teamwork scores based on peer assessment

Team dynamics feedback for post-secondary student learning teams: introducing the “Bare CARE” assessment and report

Factors That Determine the Perceived Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Collaborative Learning: a Mixed Methods Design

Who engaged in the team-based assessment? Leveraging EdTech for a self and intra-team peer-assessment solution to free-riding