Abstract:Phenomenon: Professionalism is integral to the role of the physician. Most professionalism assessments in medical training are delayed until clinical rotations where multisource feedback is available. This leaves a gap in student assessment portfolios and potentially delays professional development. Approach: A total of 246 second-year medical students (2013-2015) completed self- and peer assessments of professional behaviors in 2 courses following a series of Team-Based Learning exercises. Correlation and regression analyses were used to examine the alignment or misalignment in the relationship between the 2 types of assessments. Four subgroups were formed based on observed patterns of initial self- and peer assessment alignment or misalignment, and subgroup membership stability over time was assessed. A missing data analysis examined differences between average peer assessment scores as a function of selective nonparticipation. Findings: Spearman correlation demonstrated moderate to strong correlation between self-assessments completed alone (no simultaneous peer assessment) and self-assessments completed at the time of peer assessments ( = .59, p < .0001) but weak correlation between the two self-assessments and peer assessments (alone: = .13, p < .013; at time of peer: = .21, p < .0001). Generalized estimating equation models revealed that self-assessments done alone (p < .0001) were a significant predictor of self-assessments done at the time of peer. Course was also a significant predictor (p = .01) of self-assessment scores done at the time of peer. Peer assessment score was not a significant predictor. Bhapkar's test revealed subgroup membership based on the relationship between self- and peer ratings was relatively stable across Time 1 and Time 2 assessments ((2) = 0.83, p = .84) for all but one subgroup; members of the subgroup with initially high self-assessment and low peer assessment were significantly more likely to move to a new classification at the second measurement. A missing data analysis revealed that students who completed all self-assessments had significantly higher average peer assessment ratings compared to students who completed one or no self-assessments with a difference of -0.32, 95% confidence interval [-0.48, -0.15]. Insights: Multiple measurements of simultaneous self- and peer assessment identified a subgroup of students who consistently rated themselves higher on professionalism attributes relative to the low ratings given by their peers. This subgroup of preclinical students, along with those who elected to not complete self-assessments, may be at risk for professionalism concerns. Use of this multisource feedback tool to measure perceptual stability of professionalism behaviors is a new approach that may assist with early identification of at-risk students during preclinical years.

Using a Web-Based System to Explore Peer, Self, and Tutor Assessment in Problem-Based Learning Tutorials

An analysis of peer, self, and tutor assessment in problem-based learning tutorials

Tutor assessment of medical students in problem-based learning sessions

Learning efficacy of medical students in problem-based learning tutorials jointly facilitated with tutors from basic sciences department and clinical hospital

Medical Students' Perspective on Assessment Mechanism During Problem-Based Learning at Debre Tabor University: An Explanatory Mixed Study

Practice of In-Class Personal Modification of Problem-Based Learning Tutor Strategy in Clinical Medical Education

Peer assessment platform of clinical skills in undergraduate medical education

Near-peer teaching in problem-based learning: Perspectives from tutors and tutees

Medical Students' Perceptions of Peer Assessment in a Problem-based Learning Curriculum

What Makes a Near-Peer Learning and Tutoring Program Effective in Undergraduate Medical Education: a Qualitative Analysis

Peer tutoring in a medical school: perceptions of tutors and tutees

A Novel Approach to Assessing Professionalism in Preclinical Medical Students Using Multisource Feedback Through Paired Self- and Peer Evaluations

Gender-related differences in learning in student-led PBL tutorials

Medical students as peer tutors: a systematic review

Examination of the Quality and Effectiveness of Peer Feedback and Self‐reflection Exercises Among Medical Students

Employing students' evaluations and tutors' perceptions to evaluate a faculty development program on problem-based learning at the Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University

Tutor Group Assessments (TGAs): Criteria Based Monitoring of Medical Student Performance, Participation and Behavior in Small (Tutor) Group Sessions in a Problem Based Learning Curriculum

Medical Students’ Perception and Perceived Value of Peer Learning in Undergraduate Clinical Skill Development and Assessment: Mixed Methods Study

Validity and reliability assessment of a peer evaluation method in team-based learning classes

Visualization Tool-Supported Problem-Based Learning in Clinical Diagnostic Expertise Develop-Ment

What is a good tutorial from the student's point of view? Evaluation of tutorials in a newly established PBL block course "Basics of Drug Therapy"