Common Ingroup Identity Promotes Ethnic Psychological Compatibility:The Mediating Role of Positive Interpretation Bias

Liang Fangmei,Zhao Yufang,Yin Chenzu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230216
2023-01-01
Abstract:The study of the promoting effect of common ingroup identity on ethnic psychological compatibility has considerable theoretical and practical value. It creates a strong sense of Chinese national community and strengthens domestic integration. By constructing the common superior identity, common ingroup identity weakens the inter-ethnic boundary and perceives non-ethnic groups as ingroup members. Thus, the positive bias of the ingroup will be extended to non-ethnic groups. However, is it possible to promote ethnic psychological compatibility by improving the positive interpretation bias of non-ethnic information irrespective of competitive or uncompetitive situations? Two experiments were conducted to explore the mechanism of ethnic psychological compatibility promoted by common ingroup identity to reveal the cognitive process of common ingroup identity’s promotion of ethnic psychological compatibility from the perspective of interpretation bias.Experiment 1 investigated the role of group situation(with/without competition) and on-line interpretation bias in the relationship between common ingroup identity and ethnic psychological compatibility. The study recruited Zhuang and Miao college students(N=138) to create competitive or uncompetitive situations by re-categorizing the common ingroup identity and measuring on-line interpretation bias(including automatic and iterative interpretations) and psychological compatibility. In Experiment 2, we explored the role of off-line interpretation bias in promoting ethnic psychological compatibility in common ingroup identity with the same participants.The first finding concerning the main effect of categorization strategy was significant. We found significantly higher ethnic psychological compatibility in the common ingroup than in the independent group. The third-order interactions of categorization strategy, ethnicity, and situation were significant. In the competitive situation, for the Miao participants, ethnic psychological compatibility was significantly higher for the common ingroup than for the independent group. In the non-competitive condition, ethnic psychological compatibility in the common ingroup for Zhuang participants was significantly higher than that for the separate group. We also found that the mediating effect of automatic positive interpretation bias was significant. Finally, the mediating effect of off-line positive interpretation bias was significant. The two experiments proved that, in competitive and non-competitive contexts, common ingroup identity could promote ethnic psychological compatibility. Its promotion effect happened at the stage of meaning activation of cognitive processing(automatic positive interpretation) and the post-interpretation of information(off-line positive interpretation).The study improves the stage model of interpretive bias and extends the common ingroup identity model. In this study, interpretative bias is classified into three stages of cognitive processing: initial meaning activation of cognitive processing(automatic interpretation bias), meaning selection of information(iterative interpretation bias), and post-interpretation of information(off-line interpretation bias). Thus, the stages of interpretative bias have been refined. Furthermore, common ingroup identity promotes positive intergroup relations. It improves the automatic positive interpretation bias and off-line positive interpretation bias of external group information and expands the common ingroup identity model from the cognitive processing perspective.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?