Abstract:The study of the promoting effect of common ingroup identity on ethnic psychological compatibility has considerable theoretical and practical value. It creates a strong sense of Chinese national community and strengthens domestic integration. By constructing the common superior identity, common ingroup identity weakens the inter-ethnic boundary and perceives non-ethnic groups as ingroup members. Thus, the positive bias of the ingroup will be extended to non-ethnic groups. However, is it possible to promote ethnic psychological compatibility by improving the positive interpretation bias of non-ethnic information irrespective of competitive or uncompetitive situations? Two experiments were conducted to explore the mechanism of ethnic psychological compatibility promoted by common ingroup identity to reveal the cognitive process of common ingroup identity’s promotion of ethnic psychological compatibility from the perspective of interpretation bias.Experiment 1 investigated the role of group situation（with/without competition） and on-line interpretation bias in the relationship between common ingroup identity and ethnic psychological compatibility. The study recruited Zhuang and Miao college students（N=138） to create competitive or uncompetitive situations by re-categorizing the common ingroup identity and measuring on-line interpretation bias（including automatic and iterative interpretations） and psychological compatibility. In Experiment 2, we explored the role of off-line interpretation bias in promoting ethnic psychological compatibility in common ingroup identity with the same participants.The first finding concerning the main effect of categorization strategy was significant. We found significantly higher ethnic psychological compatibility in the common ingroup than in the independent group. The third-order interactions of categorization strategy, ethnicity, and situation were significant. In the competitive situation, for the Miao participants, ethnic psychological compatibility was significantly higher for the common ingroup than for the independent group. In the non-competitive condition, ethnic psychological compatibility in the common ingroup for Zhuang participants was significantly higher than that for the separate group. We also found that the mediating effect of automatic positive interpretation bias was significant. Finally, the mediating effect of off-line positive interpretation bias was significant. The two experiments proved that, in competitive and non-competitive contexts, common ingroup identity could promote ethnic psychological compatibility. Its promotion effect happened at the stage of meaning activation of cognitive processing（automatic positive interpretation） and the post-interpretation of information（off-line positive interpretation）.The study improves the stage model of interpretive bias and extends the common ingroup identity model. In this study, interpretative bias is classified into three stages of cognitive processing: initial meaning activation of cognitive processing（automatic interpretation bias）, meaning selection of information（iterative interpretation bias）, and post-interpretation of information（off-line interpretation bias）. Thus, the stages of interpretative bias have been refined. Furthermore, common ingroup identity promotes positive intergroup relations. It improves the automatic positive interpretation bias and off-line positive interpretation bias of external group information and expands the common ingroup identity model from the cognitive processing perspective.

Characteristics of the Differential Effects of Inter-out Group Evaluation in Low-status Groups

Ingroup/Outgroup Favoritism among the Members of Low-Status Group By Using Process Dissociation Procedure

The Influence of Superordinate Identity on Group Decision Making Through Discussion

Collective Self-Esteem Predicts the Extent to Which Low-Status Group Members Favor a High-Status Outgroup

The Implicit and Explicit Self-evaluation ofDisadvantaged Group in the Context of Intergroup Threat

Automatic and Controlled Cognitive Responses to Intergroup Threat As Assessed Using the Process Dissociation Procedure: a Study of a Low-Status Group from China.

How to Be "groupy" Matters: Groups with Shared Traits and Shared Goals Engender Distinct Patterns of Social Judgments

Leaving an Attacked Group: Authoritative Criticism Decreases Ingroup Favoritism

Expected Hierarchical Integration Reduces Perceptions of a Low Status Group As Less Competent Than a High Status Group While Maintaining the Same Level of Perception of Warmth.

Study on the Relationship of Intergroup Threat with Decision-Making for In-Groups and Out-Groups

The Influence of In-Groups and Out-Groups on the Theory-of-mind Processing: Evidence from Different Ethnic College Students

Self-esteem, ingroup favoritism, and outgroup evaluations: A meta-analysis

The Destructive Effect of Ingroup Competition on Ingroup Favoritism.

Group Membership Modulates the Recipient's Fairness Consideration in Ultimatum Game

Favored Outgroup Can Eliminate the Ingroup Reference Effect

Common Ingroup Identity Promotes Ethnic Psychological Compatibility:The Mediating Role of Positive Interpretation Bias

Effects of Intergroup Exclusion on Individual Needs Threat and Behavior Tendencies

Impact of Social Identity Complexity in Unfair Events on Intergroup Bias in Third-Party Fairness Maintenance

The Moderation Effect of Self-Enhancement on the Group-Reference Effect

Group Membership Modulates Fairness Consideration Among Deaf College Students—An Event-Related Potential Study

In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis.