Abstract:Background: Laser treatment of acne scars is common, but quality evidence on its efficacy is still needed. Our study aimed to compare picosecond laser and non-ablative fractional laser's efficacy and safety in treating acne atrophic scars. Methods: This was a randomized, split-face double-blind trial recruiting patients with acne atrophic scars. Facial halves were randomly divided and treated with fractionated frequency-doubled 1,064/532 nm picosecond Nd:YAG laser or non-ablative fractional 1,540 nm Er: glass laser. ECCA score (echelle d'evaluation clinique des cicatrices d'acne) and skin flatness measured with a non-invasive phaseshift rapid in vivo measurement of skin (PRIMOS) system were evaluated one month after the last treatment. Results: Twenty-two Fitzpatrick skin type IV patients were included in this study, with an average age of 29.68 years, an average duration of acne scars of 8.8 years. Picosecond laser impacted all acne scar types (before and after treatment; P=0.000 for all types, P<0.001 for V-type, P=0.002 for U-type, and P=0.021 for M-type) and more pronounced effect on ECCA score than non-ablative laser for V-type and U-type acne scars. After treatment, each treatment site's height was significantly lower than that before treatment (P=0.041) in the picosecond group but not in the non-ablative group (P=0.785). The reported erythema rate was higher in patients treated with a picosecond laser, while edema, exudation, purpura, pain, and long-term AEs were similar between the groups. Conclusions: Fractionated frequency-doubled 1,064/532 nm Picosecond Nd: YAG laser showed better efficacy in treating acne atrophic scars than the alternative and provided satisfactory safety with added improvement in pores and the glossiness of the skin. Registration number: ChiCTR2100045982 (comparison of fractionated frequency-doubled 1,064/532 nm picosecond Nd: YAG lasers and nonablative fractional 1,540 nm Er: glass in the treatment of facial atrophic scar: a randomized, split-face, double-blind controlled trial).

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of a 730 nm picosecond titanium sapphire laser and a 755 nm picosecond alexandrite laser for the treatment of freckles in Asian patients: A two-center randomized, split-face, controlled trial.

Therapeutic Effects of Q-Switched Alexandrite Laser in Treatment of Freckles and Lentigo

Comparison of efficacy and safety between Q-switched alexandrite laser and intense pulsed light for the treatment of facial freckles

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of a 730‐nm picosecond titanium sapphire laser and a 1064‐nm picosecond neodymium yttrium aluminum garnet laser for the treatment of acquired bilateral nevus of Ota‐like macules: A split‐face, evaluator‐blinded, randomized, and controlled pilot trial

Efficacy and safety of the picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser for treatment of dermal pigmentation in Asians—a retrospective study

Q-switched double frequency Nd:YAG 532-nm nanosecond laser vs. double frequency Nd:YAG 532-nm picosecond laser for the treatment of solar lentigines in Asians

Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Low Fluence Q‐switched 1064‐nm and Conventional Q‐Switched 755‐nm Lasers in the Treatment of Café‐au‐lait Macules: A Prospective Self‐controlled Trial

Comparison of the 1064-nm picosecond laser with fractionated microlens array and 1565-nm non-ablative fractional laser for the treatment of enlarged pores: a randomized, split-face, controlled trial

Clinical Study of Q-swiched Nd:YAG Laser and Intense Pulsed Light in Treatment of Facial Freckles

Comparative Effectiveness of 755-nm Picosecond Laser, 755- and 532-nm Nanosecond Lasers for Treatment of Café-au-Lait Macules (CALMs): A Randomized, Split-Lesion Clinical Trial

Comparative Effectiveness of 755-nm Picosecond Laser, 755-and 532-nm Nanosecond Lasers for Treatment of Cafe-au-Lait Macules (CALMs): A Randomized, Split-Lesion Clinical Trial

Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of a Picosecond Alexandrite Laser With DLA for Acne Scars in Chinese Patients

Efficacy and safety of 755-nm picosecond alexandrite laser with topical tranexamic acid versus laser monotherapy for melasma and facial rejuvenation: a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, split-face study in Chinese patients

Comparison of 755‐nm picosecond alexandrite laser versus 1064‐nm Q‐switched Nd:YAG laser for melasma: A randomized, split‐face controlled, 2‐year follow‐up study

Efficacy and Safety of 577‐nm Yellow Laser in the Treatment of Pigmented Epidermal Lesions

A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, split-face pilot study comparing Q-switched 1064-nm Nd:YAG versus 532-nm Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of solar lentigines

Comparison of fractionated frequency-doubled 1,064/532 nm picosecond Nd:YAG lasers and non-ablative fractional 1,540 nm Er: glass in the treatment of facial atrophic scars: a randomized, split-face, double-blind trial

A prospective, split-face study comparing 1,064-nm picosecond Nd:YAG laser toning with 1,064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser toning in the treatment of melasma

A Split-Face, Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Comparison of Alexandrite 755-Nm Picosecond Laser Versus Alexandrite 755-Nm Nanosecond Laser in the Treatment of Acquired Bilateral Nevus of Ota–like Macules

Effectiveness of Picosecond 755 nm Alexandrite Laser for the Treatment of Melasma