Abstract:Background: The picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser and topical tranexamic acid (TA) have shown promise in treating melasma. Aim: This aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining to a picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser combined with topical TA for melasma treatment. Patients and methods: Forty-eight patients' facial halves with bilateral symmetrical melasma were randomized to receive either topical TA and picosecond laser treatment or laser monotherapy. All patients received three consecutive picosecond laser treatment sessions at 4-week intervals, and additional one side facial received topical TA treatment twice daily until 4 weeks after the third treatments. Efficacy was assessed using the Modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI) score, VISIA (Canfield, USA) red area feature counts, and average pore volume as measured by Antera 3D®. Patient satisfaction was evaluated through questionnaires. Results: Thirty-five patients completed the study. Post-treatment, mMASI scores and VISIA red area feature counts were lower in combination therapy halves and laser monotherapy halves, and average melanin level was lower in the combination therapy halves (p < 0.05). Comparisons between the combination therapy halves and laser monotherapy halves after the third treatment revealed significant differences in mMASI scores, melanin levels, and VISIA red area feature counts (p < 0.05). After treatment, patient satisfaction rates in the combination therapy halves and monotherapy halves was 71.4% and 54.3%, respectively (p < 0.05). No obvious adverse effects were observed in the combination therapy halves; whereas, 10.42% (5/48) of participants in the laser monotherapy halves experienced temporary pigmentation, which resolved within 3 months. Conclusion: The picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser, when used independently and in combination with topical TA, has been proven to be effective in the improvement of melasma. However, the combined treatment approach showed a more pronounced improvement in melasma symptoms, with higher patient satisfaction, and was associated with a lower incidence of adverse effects. These findings strongly support that integrating topical TA with picosecond laser therapy as a superior therapeutic strategy for melasma management. Clinical trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2200057771.

Comparison of 755‐nm picosecond alexandrite laser versus 1064‐nm Q‐switched Nd:YAG laser for melasma: A randomized, split‐face controlled, 2‐year follow‐up study

Novel 532‐nm Q‐switched Nd: YAG laser for the treatment of melasma and rejuvenation: a prospective, randomized controlled comparison with 1,064‐nm Q‐switched Nd: YAG laser

A prospective, split-face study comparing 1,064-nm picosecond Nd:YAG laser toning with 1,064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser toning in the treatment of melasma

Efficacy and Safety of Fractional Q-switched 1064-Nm Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser in the Treatment of Melasma in Chinese Patients.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Picosecond Nd:YAG Laser (1,064 Nm), Picosecond Alexandrite Laser (755 Nm) and 2% Hydroquinone Cream in the Treatment of Melasma: A Randomized, Controlled, Assessor-Blinded Trial.

755-nm picosecond laser plus topical 20% azelaic acid compared to topical 20% azelaic acid alone for the treatment of melasma: a randomized, split-face and controlled trial

Efficacy and Safety of Laser‐related Therapy for Melasma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐analysis

Combined Efficacy of Q-Switched 785 nm Laser and Tranexamic Acid Cream in the Treatment of Melasma: A Prospective Clinical Study

Efficacy and safety of 755-nm picosecond alexandrite laser with topical tranexamic acid versus laser monotherapy for melasma and facial rejuvenation: a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, split-face study in Chinese patients

A Combination Treatment of Drug‐laser‐photon for Melasma: A Retrospective Study of Clinical Cases

Safety and efficacy of a picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser combined with topical tranexamic acid in the treatment of melasma

Comparative Effectiveness of 755-nm Picosecond Laser, 755- and 532-nm Nanosecond Lasers for Treatment of Café-au-Lait Macules (CALMs): A Randomized, Split-Lesion Clinical Trial

Efficacy and safety of picosecond laser for the treatment of melasma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Combined treatment of melasma involving low-fluence Q-switched Nd:YAG laser and fractional microneedling radiofrequency

Comparison of efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid mesotherapy versus oral tranexamic acid in patients with melasma undergoing Q-switched fractional 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser: A blinded RCT and follow-up

Laser therapy in the treatment of melasma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of a 730‐nm picosecond titanium sapphire laser and a 1064‐nm picosecond neodymium yttrium aluminum garnet laser for the treatment of acquired bilateral nevus of Ota‐like macules: A split‐face, evaluator‐blinded, randomized, and controlled pilot trial

Efficacy and Safety of Low-Fluence 730-nm Picosecond Laser in the Treatment of Melasma in Chinese Patients

A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, split-face pilot study comparing Q-switched 1064-nm Nd:YAG versus 532-nm Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of solar lentigines

Optimizing Q-switched lasers for melasma and acquired dermal melanoses