Abstract:The trust game, derived from an economics experiment, has recently attracted interest in the field of evolutionary dynamics. In a recent version of the evolutionary trust game, players adopt one of three strategies: investor, trustworthy trustee, or untrustworthy trustee. Trustworthy trustees enhance and share the investment with the investor, whereas untrustworthy trustees retain the full amount, betraying the investor. Following this setup, we investigate a two-player trust game, which is analytically feasible under weak selection. We explore the evolution of trust in structured populations, factoring in four strategy updating rules: pairwise comparison (PC), birth-death (BD), imitation (IM), and death-birth (DB). Comparing structured populations with well-mixed populations, we arrive at two main conclusions. First, in the absence of untrustworthy trustees, there is a saddle point between investors and trustworthy trustees, with collaboration thriving best in well-mixed populations. The collaboration diminishes sequentially from DB to IM to PC/BD updating rules in structured populations. Second, an invasion of untrustworthy trustees makes this saddle point unstable and leads to the extinction of investors. The 3-strategy system stabilizes at an equilibrium line where the trustworthy and untrustworthy trustees coexist. The stability span of trustworthy trustees is maximally extended under the PC and BD updating rules in structured populations, while it decreases in a sequence from IM to DB updating rules, with the well-mixed population being the least favorable. This research thus adds an analytical lens to the evolution of trust in structured populations.

Building Cooperation Through Gradualism in Finitely Repeated Investment Games

Conditional Investment Strategy in Evolutionary Trust Games with Repeated Group Interactions

Stochastic Evolutionary Dynamics of Trust Games with Asymmetric Parameters

Discreet investors exert greater influence on cooperation in the public goods game

Gradual Learning Supports Cooperation in Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma Game.

Coevolutionary Dynamics Of Initial Investment And Reciprocation Rate In Continuous Public Goods Games

One Step at a Time: Does Gradualism Build Coordination?

Reputation-Based Conditional Investment Enhances the Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game

Adaptive and Bounded Investment Returns Promote Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Games

Reputation-based Investment Strategy Promotes Cooperation in Public Goods Games

Evolutionary dynamics of trust in the N-player trust game with individual reward and punishment

An evolutionary trust game model with group reputation within the asymmetric population

Voluntary participation boosts cooperation in repeated multiplayer games

Evolution of trust in N-player trust games with loss assessment

Evolution of Trust in a Hierarchical Population with Punishing Investors

Adaptive Play Stabilizes Cooperation in Continuous Public Goods Games

To Trust or Not to Trust: Evolutionary Dynamics of an Asymmetric N-player Trust Game

Evolution of trust in structured populations

Effect of heterogeneous investments on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods game.

Benefits of Asynchronous Exclusion for the Evolution of Cooperation in Stochastic Evolutionary Optional Public Goods Games

Dynamic Allocation of Investments Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game