Abstract:The emergence and maintenance of cooperative behavior is a fascinating topic in evolutionary biology and social science. The public goods game (PGG) is a paradigm for exploring cooperative behavior. In PGG, the total resulting payoff is divided equally among all participants. This feature still leads to the dominance of defection without substantially magnifying the public good by a multiplying factor. Much effort has been made to explain the evolution of cooperative strategies, including a recent model in which only a portion of the total benefit is shared by all the players through introducing a new strategy named persistent cooperation. A persistent cooperator is a contributor who is willing to pay a second cost to retrieve the remaining portion of the payoff contributed by themselves. In a previous study, this model was analyzed in the framework of well-mixed populations. This paper focuses on discussing the persistent cooperation in lattice-structured populations. The evolutionary dynamics of the structured populations consisting of three types of competing players (pure cooperators, defectors, and persistent cooperators) are revealed by theoretical analysis and numerical simulations. In particular, the approximate expressions of fixation probabilities for strategies are derived on one-dimensional lattices. The phase diagrams of stationary states, and the evolution of frequencies and spatial patterns for strategies are illustrated on both one-dimensional and square lattices by simulations. Our results are consistent with the general observation that, at least in most situations, a structured population facilitates the evolution of cooperation. Specifically, here we find that the existence of persistent cooperators greatly suppresses the spreading of defectors under more relaxed conditions in structured populations compared to that obtained in well-mixed populations.

Discreet investors exert greater influence on cooperation in the public goods game

Effect of heterogeneous investments on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods game.

Heterogeneous Investment in Spatial Public Goods Game with Mixed Strategy

Heterogeneous investment promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game on hypergraphs

Selective Investment Promotes Cooperation in Public Goods Game

Adaptive and Bounded Investment Returns Promote Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Games

Randomly Biased Investments and the Evolution of Public Goods on Interdependent Networks

Evolution of cooperation in a heterogeneous population with influential individuals

Particle swarm optimization with historical return decay enhances cooperation in public goods games with investment risks

The evolutionary public goods game on scale-free networks with heterogeneous investment

Evolutionary dynamics for persistent cooperation in structured populations

Effect of Reputation-Based Heterogeneous Investment on Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game

Promotion of Cooperation Induced by Heterogeneity of Both Investment and Payoff Allocation in Spatial Public Goods Game

The evolution of cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma games with heterogeneous relationships

Impact of Individual Difference and Investment Heterogeneity on the Collective Cooperation in the Spatial Public Goods Game

Evolutionary Investors’ Power-Based Game on Networks

Influencer Propagation Model Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game

Reputation-Based Conditional Investment Enhances the Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game

The Interplay Between Reputation and Heterogeneous Investment Enhances Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game

Heterogeneity of allocation promotes cooperation in public goods games

The public goods game on scale-free networks with heterogeneous investment