3D Printed High-Strength Bioceramic Dome Scaffolds with Controllable Biodegradation for Guided Bone Regeneration

Chuchu Xu,Fanghui Wu,Jun Yang,Hui Wang,Jimin Jiang,Zhaonan Bao,Xianyan Yang,Guojing Yang,Zhongru Gou,Fuming He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4122756
2022-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Alveolar bone loss and insufficient bone mass are major obstacles to the oral implant treatment. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is an effective and widely used method to solve this problem. Titanium mesh with good space maintenance ability shows excellent effect in the assistance of GBR. Unfortunately, such undegradable metal mesh needs to be removed by secondary operation, and the exposure after operation is unavoidable. Thus, it is a big challenge to repair the clinical bone defects with different shapes and sizes by customization. In this study, the wollastonite bioceramics without and with 6% magnesium doping (CSi, CSi-Mg6) were prepared to fabricates the macroporous dome-like meshes with different CSi/CSi-Mg6 mass ratio (0:100, 16:84, 32:68) via digital light processing-based 3D printing (DLP) technique. The mechanical parameters, biodegradable rate and BMSC cell viability in vitro of the macroporous scaffolds with different morphologies were also evaluated systematically. The in vivo osteoconductive behaviors in the conventional calcined bone granules with the assistance of bioceramic domes and titanium meshes were compared in a rabbit calvarial bone defect model. The results showed that the CSi/CSi-Mg6 scaffolds exhibited satisfactory mechanical properties, and the biodegradable macroporous domes displayed significantly higher osteoproductive capability than the titanium mesh in the porous networks of calcined bone mineral granules. The appreciable CSi-Mg6 content (³ 84%) in the dome scaffolds maintained porous structures after 16 weeks of implantation, and the scaffolds containing 16% CSi greatly accelerated the scaffold biodegradation and restoration treatment. Totally, the 3D printed CSi-Mg6-based scaffolds are expected to be the promising candidates to replace titanium mesh in GBR.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?