Optimization Algorithm of Deadbeat Current Predictive Control for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor

FAN Peizhang,LIU Ling,JIN Dongsong,LIU Siyuan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7652/xjtuxb202304004
2023-01-01
Abstract:A robust feed forward current predictive control algorithm was proposed to solve the problem that the deadbeat current predictive control of surface mounted permanent magnet synchronous motor(PMSM) causes the system instability and the d, q axis current oscillates greatly due to the motor parameter deviation. Firstly, the reference current at the previous time and the sampling current at the current time were used to replace the sampling current at the current time in the traditional voltage prediction formula to change the close-loop transfer function of the sampling current and reference current, and then the robust factor was used to adjust the stability margin of the system to improve the robustness and stability margin of the control system. The simulation results showed that when the model inductance was 2 and 4 times of the reference inductance respectively, the variance of the proposed robust feedforward current predictive control algorithm was reduced by 61.5% and 67.3% compared with the traditional algorithm. In addition, to solve the problem that the steady state current static error expands when the motor parameters are mismatched, an incremental current static error elimination algorithm was proposed. Firstly, the given voltage at the next time was calculated by the difference between the predicted voltage, actual current and reference current at the adjacent time to eliminate the influence of motor flux parameters on the static error of steady state current. Then, the error between actual current and reference current was used to compensate the given voltage to reduce the static error of steady state current. The simulation results showed that when the flux linkage of the model was 0.5 times, 0.4 times and 0.375 times of the reference flux linkage, respectively. The error of the proposed incremental current static error elimination algorithm was reduced by 38.69%, 56.94% and 54.66% compared with the traditional algorithm for q-axis current.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?