Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/MR and PET/CT for Pretreatment TNM Staging of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Lifang Pang,Wujian Mao,Yiqiu Zhang,Guobing Liu,Pengcheng Hu,Shuguang Chen,Yushen Gu,Yueqi Wang,Houbao Liu,Hongcheng Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03925-x
IF: 2.4
2023-01-01
Abdominal Radiology
Abstract:18F-FDG PET/MR has been applied to the diagnosis and preoperative staging in various tumor types; however, reports using PET/MR in hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) are rare. We investigated the value of PET/MR for preoperative staging and compared it with PET/CT in HCCA. Fifty-eight patients with HCCA confirmed by pathology were retrospectively analyzed. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging was performed first, followed with whole-body PET/MR imaging. SUVmax of tumor and normal liver tissue were measured. Paired T test was used to compare SUVmax of tumor and normal liver tissue of PET/CT and PET/MR. In addition, McNemar test was used to compare the accuracy of TNM staging and Bismuth-Corlette typing between PET/CT and PET/MR. There was no significant difference in SUVmax between PET/CT and PET/MR in primary tumor lesions (6.6 ± 5.5 vs. 6.8 ± 6.2, P = 0.439). SUVmax of PET/CT and PET/MR in normal liver parenchyma was significantly different (3.0 ± 0.5 vs. 2.1 ± 0.5, P < 0.001). The accuracy of PET/MR in diagnosing T staging and N staging was significantly higher than those of PET/CT (72.4
What problem does this paper attempt to address?