Combined early dynamic F-18-FDG PET/CT and conventional whole-body F-18-FDG PET/CT in hepatocellular carcinoma

Yiqiu Zhang,Yun Dong,Wenjun Yu,Shuguang Chen,Haojun Yu,Beilei Li,Hongcheng Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03986-y
IF: 2.4
2023-01-01
Abdominal Radiology
Abstract:ObjectiveTo investigate the diagnostic value of early dynamic F-18-FDG PET/CT(ED F-18-FDG PET/CT) combined with conventional whole-body F-18-FDG PET/CT(WB F-18-FDG PET/CT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as well as the difference of early dynamic blood flow parameters and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in HCC patients with/without liver cirrhosis or microvascular invasion (MVI).MethodsTwenty-two consecutive patients (mean age 57.8 years) with 28 established HCC lesions (mean size 4.5 cm) underwent a blood flow study with an F-18-FDG dynamic scan divided into 24 sequences of 5 s each and a standard PET/CT scan. On the ED PET/CT study, an experienced PET/CT physician obtained volumes of interest (VOIs) where three blood flow estimates (time to peak [TTP], blood flow [BF], and hepatic perfusion index [HPI]) were calculated. On the WB PET/CT study, a VOI was placed on the fused scan for each HCC and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was obtained. Comparison of blood flow estimates, SUVmax, and tumor/background ratio (TNR) was performed among HCCs with and without angioinvasion, as well as HCCs in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic liver.ResultsCompared with WB F-18-FDG PET/CT alone, ED combined with WB F-18-FDG PET/CT can significantly increase the detection rate of moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated HCCs (both P < 0.05). HPI was higher in HCCs in patients with liver cirrhosis than those without liver cirrhosis (P = 0.044). There was no significant difference in TTP, BF, SUVmax, or TNR between HCCs in patients with liver cirrhosis and those without liver cirrhosis. There was no significant difference in blood flow estimates or SUVmax in background liver parenchyma between patients with and those without cirrhosis. TTP was shorter in HCCs with MVI than without MVI (P = 0.046). There was no significant difference in BF, HPI, SUVmax, or TNR between HCCs with MVI and without MVI. There was no significant difference in blood flow estimates or SUVmax in background liver parenchyma between patients with and those without MVI.ConclusionED combined with WB F-18-FDG PET/CT can significantly increase the detection rate of moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated HCCs. HPI was significantly higher in HCCs in patients with liver cirrhosis than those without liver cirrhosis. TTP was significantly shorter in HCCs with MVI than without MVI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?