A head-to-head comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/MR in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma under different disease settings

Mengxia Zhang,Lifang Pang,Haojun Yu,Hongcheng Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1967/s002449912722
Abstract:Objective: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are complementary in staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The combination of MRI and functional imaging from PET in PET/MR is promising in NPC management. Diagnostic performance of PET/CT and PET/MR was compared in 46 patients with histologically confirmed NPC under different disease scenarios, including primary non-metastatic cases, primary metastatic cases, recurrence and/or metastasis after treatment, and post-treatment follow-up cases. Subjects and methods: Forty-six patients underwent both PET/CT and PET/MR in the same day. Primary tumor extension into risk-stratified anatomic structures, retropharyngeal and cervical lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis and post-treatment follow-up results, were compared. Results: For high-risk structures, PET/MR detected two more sides of tensor/levator veli palatine muscle involvement, one more case of clivus involvement, and ruled out 12 false-positive sides of prevertebral muscle involvement by PET/CT. For medium-risk structures, PET/MR detected four more sides of medial pterygoid muscle involvement. For low-risk structures, abnormal signal on massa lateralis atlantis was detected by PET/MR. PET/MR detected 14 more positive retropharyngeal lymph nodes and more liver micrometastases than PET/CT. Overall, PET/MR changed two patients' T staging. Conclusion: Positron emission tomography/MR outperforms PET/CT in delineating muscle, skull-base bone, and nodal involvement, and identifying liver micrometastases, may serve as a single-step staging modality for NPC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?