Abstract:The polar precursor method is widely considered to be the most robust physically motivated method to predict the amplitude of an upcoming solar <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://cycle.It" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> uses indicators of the magnetic field concentrated near the poles around sunspot minimum. Here, we present an extensive performance analysis of various such predictors, based on both observational data (WSO magnetograms, MWO polar faculae counts and Pulkovo $A(t)$ index) and outputs (polar cap magnetic flux and global dipole moment) of various existing flux transport dynamo <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://models.We" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> calculate Pearson correlation coefficients ($r$) of the predictors with the next cycle amplitude as a function of time measured from several solar cycle landmarks: setting $r= 0.8$ as a lower limit for acceptable predictions, we find that observations and models alike indicate that the earliest time when the polar predictor can be safely used is 4 years after polar field reversal. This is typically 2--3 years before solar minimum and about 7~years before the predicted maximum, considerably extending the {usual} temporal scope of the polar precursor method. Re-evaluating the predictors another 3 years later, at the time of solar minimum, further increases the correlation level to $r\ga 0.9$. As an illustration of the result, we determine the predicted amplitude of Cycle 25 based on the value of the WSO polar field at the now official minimum date of December 2019 as $126\pm 3$. A forecast based on the value in early 2017, 4~years after polar reversal would have only differed from this final prediction by $3.1\pm 14.7$\%.

Comparison of physics-based prediction models of solar cycle 25

A Dynamo-Based Prediction of Solar Cycle 25

Solar cycle activity: an early prediction for cycle #25

Prediction of sunspot and plage coverage for Solar Cycle 25

Predictions for solar flares activity in solar cycle 25

Statistical analysis and forecasting of solar wind parameters across solar cycles

Forecasting solar cycle 25 using comprehensive precursor combination and multiple regression technique

Physical Models for Solar Cycle Predictions

Predictability of the solar cycle over one cycle

Solar Cycle Precursors and the Outlook for Cycle 25

Prediction of the amplitude of solar cycle 25 from the ratio of sunspot number to sunspot-group area, low latitude activity, and 130-year solar cycle

Prediction of solar activities: Sunspot numbers and solar magnetic synoptic maps

A deterministic model for forecasting long-term solar activity

The polar precursor method for solar cycle prediction: comparison of predictors and their temporal range

Improvement of solar cycle prediction: Plateau of solar axial dipole moment

Does the current minimum validate (or invalidate) cycle prediction methods?

Comparison of Coronal Extrapolation Methods for Cycle 24 Using HMI Data

Use of physics to improve solar forecast: Physics-informed persistence models for simultaneously forecasting GHI, DNI, and DHI

A Model of Sunspot Number with a Modified Logistic Function

Comparison of Synoptic Maps and PFSS Solutions for the Declining Phase of Solar Cycle 24

Forecast and backcast of the solar cycles