Abstract:The polar precursor method is widely considered to be the most robust physically motivated method to predict the amplitude of an upcoming solar <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://cycle.It" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> uses indicators of the magnetic field concentrated near the poles around sunspot minimum. Here, we present an extensive performance analysis of various such predictors, based on both observational data (WSO magnetograms, MWO polar faculae counts and Pulkovo $A(t)$ index) and outputs (polar cap magnetic flux and global dipole moment) of various existing flux transport dynamo <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://models.We" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> calculate Pearson correlation coefficients ($r$) of the predictors with the next cycle amplitude as a function of time measured from several solar cycle landmarks: setting $r= 0.8$ as a lower limit for acceptable predictions, we find that observations and models alike indicate that the earliest time when the polar predictor can be safely used is 4 years after polar field reversal. This is typically 2--3 years before solar minimum and about 7~years before the predicted maximum, considerably extending the {usual} temporal scope of the polar precursor method. Re-evaluating the predictors another 3 years later, at the time of solar minimum, further increases the correlation level to $r\ga 0.9$. As an illustration of the result, we determine the predicted amplitude of Cycle 25 based on the value of the WSO polar field at the now official minimum date of December 2019 as $126\pm 3$. A forecast based on the value in early 2017, 4~years after polar reversal would have only differed from this final prediction by $3.1\pm 14.7$\%.

Solar Cycle Precursors and the Outlook for Cycle 25

Predicting Solar Cycle 26 Using the Polar Flux as a Precursor, Spectral Analysis, and Machine Learning: Crossing a Gleissberg Minimum?

Does the current minimum validate (or invalidate) cycle prediction methods?

Prediction of the amplitude of solar cycle 25 from the ratio of sunspot number to sunspot-group area, low latitude activity, and 130-year solar cycle

Forecasting solar cycle 25 using comprehensive precursor combination and multiple regression technique

A prediction for the 25th solar cycle maximum amplitude

Overlapping Magnetic Activity Cycles and the Sunspot Number: Forecasting Sunspot Cycle 25 Amplitude

A Dynamo-Based Prediction of Solar Cycle 25

Prediction of sunspot and plage coverage for Solar Cycle 25

Predicting Sunspot Numbers for Solar Cycles 25 and 26

Solar cycle activity: an early prediction for cycle #25

Predictions of the Maximum Amplitude, Time of Occurrence, and Total Length of Solar Cycle 24

Predicting the Timing of the Solar Cycle 25 Polar Field Reversal

Predicting the Timing of the the Solar Cycle 25 Polar Field Reversal

Hemispheric Sunspot Number Prediction for Solar Cycles 25 and 26 Using Spectral Analysis and Machine Learning Techniques

Will Solar Cycles 25 and 26 Be Weaker than Cycle 24 ?

Prediction of solar activities: Sunspot numbers and solar magnetic synoptic maps

The polar precursor method for solar cycle prediction: comparison of predictors and their temporal range

What do halo CMEs tell us about solar cycle 25?

Comparison of physics-based prediction models of solar cycle 25

On Polar Magnetic Field Reversal in Solar Cycles 21, 22, 23, and 24