Emulating Temporal Receptive Fields of Higher Level Auditory Neurons for ASR

Garimella S. V. S. Sivaram,H. Hermansky

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87391-4_65

2008-09-08

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Prediction of sunspot and plage coverage for Solar Cycle 25

Valentina Penza,Francesco Berrilli,Luca Bertello,Matteo Cantoresi,Serena Criscuoli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac3663

2021-11-04

Abstract:Solar variability occurs over a broad range of spatial and temporal scales, from the Sun's brightening over its lifetime to the fluctuations commonly associated with magnetic activity over minutes to years. The latter activity includes most prominently the 11-year sunspot solar cycle and its modulations. Space weather events, in the form of solar flares, solar energetic particles, coronal mass ejections, and geomagnetic storms, have long been known to approximately follow the solar cycle occurring more frequently at solar maximum than solar minimum. These events can significantly impact our advanced technologies and critical infrastructures, making the prediction for the strength of future solar cycles particularly important. Several methods have been proposed to predict the strength of the next solar cycle, cycle 25, with results that are generally not always consistent. Most of these methods are based on the international sunspot number time series, or other indicators of solar activity. We present here a new approach that uses more than 100 years of measured fractional areas of the visible solar disk covered by sunspots and plages and an empirical relationship for each of these two indices of solar activity in even-odd cycles. We anticipate that cycle 25 will peak in 2024 and will last for about 12 years, slightly longer than cycle 24. We also found that, in terms of sunspot and plage areas coverage, the amplitude of cycle 25 will be substantially similar or slightly higher than cycle 24.

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
Global solar photospheric and coronal magnetic field over activity cycles 21–25

Gordon Petrie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2024005

IF: 3.3

2024-03-19

Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate

Abstract:The evolution of the global solar magnetic field from the beginning of cycle 21 (mid-1970s) until the currently-ascending cycle 25 is described using photospheric full-disk and synoptic magnetograms from NSO Kitt Peak Vacuum Telescope (KPVT) 512-channel and Spectromagnetograph (SPMG) and the Synoptic Optical Long-term Investigation of the Sun (SOLIS) Vector Spectro-Magnetograph (VSM) and Global Oscillations Network Group (GONG), and Stanford University's Wilcox Solar Observatory (WSO). The evolving strength and symmetry of the global coronal field are described by potential-field source-surface models decomposed into axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric, and even- and odd-ordered magnetic multipoles. The overall weakness of the global solar magnetic field since cycle 23 splits the 50-year observing window into the stronger, simpler, more hemispherically symmetric cycles 21 and 22 and the weaker, more complex cycles 23 and 24. An anomalously large decrease in the global solar field strength occurred during cycles 23, and an anomalously weak axial/polar field resulted from that cycle, accompanied by an anomalously weak radial interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) during cycle 23 activity minimum and a weakened radial IMF overall since cycle 23. The general long-term decline in solar field strength and the development during cycle 24 of strong swings of hemispheric and polar asymmetry are analyzed in detail, including their transfer through global coronal structural changes to dominate mean in situ interplanetary field measurements for several years. Although more symmetric than cycle 24, the rise phase of cycle 25 began with the southern leading the northern hemisphere, but the north has recovered to lead this cycle's polar field reversal. The mean polar flux (poleward of ±60°) has reversed at each pole, so far more symmetrically than the cycle 23 and 24 polar reversals.

astronomy & astrophysics,geochemistry & geophysics,meteorology & atmospheric sciences
Statistical analysis and forecasting of solar wind parameters across solar cycles

Mu He,Hongbing Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70564-7

IF: 4.6

2024-08-26

Scientific Reports

Abstract:This study investigated the statistical properties of solar wind parameters spanning Solar Cycles 20–24, elucidating periodicities that closely aligned with the solar cycle. Significantly, correlations between the smoothed 27-day average value of solar wind parameters and sunspot numbers (SSN) were discerned, shedding light on the intricate interplay between solar activity and solar wind characteristics. Furthermore, the study employed an optimized Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM+) model for forecasting Solar Cycle 25, demonstrating promising predictive capabilities. The analysis predicted the occurrence time of the peak value of SSN in Solar Cycle 25 to be on 27 October 2024 ± 136 days, based on the average relationship with the occurrence time of the trough of Plasma Beta. Notably, observations revealed a double peak in SC-25's solar activity, introducing uncertainty regarding the relative magnitude of each peak.

multidisciplinary sciences
Solar cycle activity: an early prediction for cycle #25

Stefano Sello

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1902.05294

2019-02-14

Abstract:Solar activity forecasting is an important topic for numerous scientific and technological areas, such as space mission operations, electric power transmission lines, power transformation stations and earth geophysical and climatic impact. Nevertheless, the well-known difficulty is how to accurately predict, on the basis of various recorded solar activity indices, the complete evolution of future solar cycles, due to highly complex dynamical and stochastic processes involved, mainly related to interaction of different components of internal magnetic fields. There are two main distinct classes of solar cycle prediction methods: the precursor-like ones and the mathematical-numerical ones. The main characteristic of precursor techniques, both purely solar and geomagnetic, is their physical basis. Conversely, the non-precursor methods use different mathematical and/or numerical properties of the known temporal evolution of solar activity indices to extract useful information for predicting future activity. For current solar cycle #24 we obtained fairly good statistical performances from both precursor and purely numerical methods, such as the so-called solar precursor and nonlinear ones. To further check the performances of these prediction techniques, we compared the early predictions for the next solar cycle #25. Preliminary results support some coherence of the prediction methods considered and confirm the current trend of a relatively low solar activity.

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
Prediction of solar activities: Sunspot numbers and solar magnetic synoptic maps

Rui Zhuo,Jiansen He,Die Duan,Rong Lin,Ziqi Wu,Limei Yan,Yong Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-023-1354-4

2024-07-20

Science China Earth Sciences

Abstract:The evolution of solar magnetic fields is significant for understanding and predicting solar activities. And our knowledge of solar magnetic fields largely depends on the photospheric magnetic field. In this paper, based on the spherical harmonic expansion of the photospheric magnetic field observed by Wilcox Solar Observatory, we analyze the time series of spherical harmonic coefficients and predict Sunspot Number as well as synoptic maps for Solar Cycle 25. We find that solar maximum years have complex short-period disturbances, and the time series of coefficient g 7 0 is nearly in-phase with Sunspot Number, which may be related to solar meridional circulation. Utilizing Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTM), our prediction suggests that the maximum of Solar Cycle 25 is likely to occur in June 2024 with an error of 8 months, the peak sunspot number may be 166.9±22.6, and the next solar minimum may occur around January 2031. By incorporating Empirical Mode Decomposition, we enhance our forecast of synoptic maps truncated to Order 5, validating their relative reliability. This prediction not only addresses a gap in forecasting the global distribution of the solar magnetic field but also holds potential reference value for forthcoming solar observation plans.

geosciences, multidisciplinary
Long-term evolution of solar activity and prediction of the followingsolar cycles

Pei-Xin Luo,Bao-Lin Tan,Peixin Luo,Baolin Tan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/ad1ed2

2024-01-15

Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics

Abstract:Abstract Solar activities have a great impact on modern high-tech systems, such as human aerospace, satellite communication and navigation, deep space exploration, and related scientific research. Therefore, studying the long - term evolution trend of solar activity and accurately predicting the future solar cycles is highly anticipated. Through wavelet transform and empirical function fitting of the longest recorded data of the annual average relative sunspot number (ASN) series of 323 years to date, this work decisively verified the existence of the solar century cycles and confirmed that its length is about 104.0 years, and the magnitude has a slightly increasing trend on the time scale of several hundreds of years. Based on this long-term evolutionary trend, we predicted solar cycle 25 and 26 by using phase similar prediction methods. As for the solar cycle 25, its maximum ASN will be about 146.7 ± 33.40, obviously stronger than solar cycle 24. The peak year will occur approximately in 2024, and the cycle length is about 11 ± 1 years. As for the solar cycle 26, it will start around 2030, reach the maximum between 2035 and 2036, with maximum ASN of about 133.0 ± 3.200, and the cycle length is about 10 years.

astronomy & astrophysics
What do halo CMEs tell us about solar cycle 25?

Nat Gopalswamy,Grzegorz Michalek,Seiji Yashiro,Pertti Mäkelä,Sachiko Akiyama,Hong Xie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acdde2

2023-06-11

Abstract:It is known that the weak state of the heliosphere due to diminished solar activity in cycle 24 back-reacted on coronal mass ejections (CMEs) to make them appear wider for a given speed. One of the consequences of the weak state of the heliosphere is that more CMEs appear as halo CMEs (HCMEs), and halos are formed at shorter heliocentric distances. Current predictions for the strength of solar cycle (SC) 25 range from half to twice the strength of SC 24. We compare the HCME occurrence rate and other properties during the rise phase of cycles 23, 24, and 25 to weigh in on the strength of SC 25. We find that HCME and solar wind properties in SC 25 are intermediate between SCs 23 and 24, but closer to SC 24. The HCME occurrence rate, normalized to the sunspot number, is higher in SCs 24 and 25 than in SC 23. The solar wind total pressure in SC 25 is ~35% smaller than that in SC 23. Furthermore, the occurrence rates of high-energy solar energetic particle events and intense geomagnetic storms are well below the corresponding values in SC 23, but similar to those in SC 24. We conclude that cycle 25 is likely to be similar to or slightly stronger than cycle 24, in agreement with polar-field precursor methods for cycle 25 prediction

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
Prediction of the amplitude of solar cycle 25 from the ratio of sunspot number to sunspot-group area, low latitude activity, and 130-year solar cycle

J. Javaraiah

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2924.04.043

2024-05-06

Abstract:We analysed the combined data of sunspot groups from Greenwich Photoheliographic Results (GPR) during the period 1874-1976 and Debrecen Photoheliographic Data (DPD) during 1977-2017 and determined the monthly mean, annual mean, and 13-month smoothed monthly mean whole sphere sunspot-group area (WSGA). We have also analysed the monthly mean, annual mean, and 13-month smoothed monthly mean version 2 of international sunspot number (SN) during the period 1874-2017. We fitted the annual mean WSGA and SN data during each of Solar Cycles 12-24 separately to the linear and nonlinear (parabola) forms. In the cases of Solar Cycles 14, 17, and 24 the nonlinear fits are found better than the linear fits. We find that there exists a secular decreasing trend in the slope of the WSGA-SN linear relation during Solar Cycles 12-24. A secular decreasing trend is also seen in the coefficient of the first order term of the nonlinear relation. The existence of ~77-year variation is seen in the ratio of the amplitude to WSGA at the maximum epoch of solar cycle. From the pattern of this long-term variation of the ratio we inferred that Solar Cycle 25 will be larger than both Solar Cycles 24 and 26. Using an our earlier method (now slightly revised) we predicted 127 (plus or minus 26) and 141 (plus or minus 19) for the amplitude of Solar Cycle~25. Based on ~130-year periodicity found in the cycle-to-cycle variation of the amplitudes of Solar Cycles 12-24 we find the shape of Solar Cycle 25 would be similar to that of Solar Cycle 13 and predicted for Solar Cycle 25 the amplitude 135 (plus or minus 8), maximum epoch 2024.21 (March 2024) plus or minus 6-month, and end epoch 2032.21 (March 2032) plus or minus 6-month with SN ~4.

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
Long-term evolution of solar activity and prediction of the following solar cycles

Peixin Luo,Baolin Tan

2024-02-21

Abstract:Solar activities have a great impact on modern high-tech systems, such as human aerospace, satellite communication and navigation, deep space exploration, and related scientific research. Therefore, studying the long - term evolution trend of solar activity and accurately predicting the future solar cycles is highly anticipated. Based on wavelet transform and empirical function fitting of the longest recorded data of the annual average relative sunspot number (ASN) series of 323 years to date, this work decisively verified the existence of the solar century cycles and confirmed that its length is about 104.0 years, and the magnitude has a slightly increasing trend on the time scale of several hundreds of years. Based on this long-term evolutionary trend, we predicted solar cycle 25 and 26 by using phase similar prediction methods. As for the solar cycle 25, its maximum ASN will be about $146.7\pm 33.40$, obviously stronger than solar cycle 24. The peak year will occur approximately in 2024, and the period is about $11\pm 1$ years. As for the solar cycle 26, it will start around 2030, reach the maximum between 2035 and 2036, with maximum ASN of about $133.0\pm 3.200$, and the period is about 10 years.

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics,Space Physics
A Dynamo-Based Prediction of Solar Cycle 25

Wei Guo,Jie Jiang,Jing-Xiu Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01878-2

IF: 2.961

2021-09-01

Solar Physics

Abstract:The solar activity cycle varies in amplitude. The last Solar Cycle 24 is the weakest in the past century. Sun's activity dominates Earth's space environment. The frequency and intensity of Sun's activity follow the solar cycle. Hence there are practical needs to know the amplitude of the upcoming Solar Cycle 25. Dynamo-based solar cycle predictions not only provide forecasts, but also offer an effective way to evaluate our understanding of the solar cycle. In this article we apply the method of the first successful dynamo-based prediction developed for Solar Cycle 24 to predict Solar Cycle 25, so that we can verify whether the previous success is repeatable. The prediction shows that Solar Cycle 25 would be about 10% stronger than Solar Cycle 24 with an amplitude of 126 (international sunspot number Version 2.0). The result suggests that Solar Cycle 25 will not be the beginning of a Maunder-like grand solar minimum as suggested by some publications. The solar behavior in about four to five years will confirm whether the prediction method captures the key mechanism for solar cycle variability, which is the polar field around the cycle minimum in our model.

astronomy & astrophysics
Predicting the Timing of the the Solar Cycle 25 Polar Field Reversal

Bibhuti Kumar Jha,Lisa A. Upton

2024-01-19

Abstract:The process of the Sun's polar field cancellation reversal commences with the emergence of new cycle Hale's polarity active regions. Once the Sun undergoes polarity reversal, typically occurring near the peak of solar activity, it begins the process of accumulating the seed field for the forthcoming solar cycle. In recent years, the Advective Flux Transport (AFT) model has proven highly effective in forecasting the progression of polar fields by leveraging observations of surface flows and magnetic flux emergence. In this study, we make use of the predictive capability of the AFT model to simulate the evolution of the polar fields and estimate the timing of the Solar Cycle 25 polarity reversal in both hemispheres of the Sun. We use the statistical properties of active regions along with Solar Cycle~13, which closely resembles the current solar cycle (Cycle~25), to generate synthetic active regions in order to simulate future magnetic flux emergence in AFT to predict the evolution of the polar field. Based on our simulations, we anticipate that the Northern hemisphere of the Sun will undergo a polarity reversal between June 2024 and November 2024, with the center of our distribution at August 2024. In the Southern hemisphere, we anticipate a polarity reversal between November 2024 and July 2025, centered around February 2025. Additionally, assuming that the reversal of the axial dipole moment coincides with the peak of the solar cycle, our findings indicate that Cycle 25 is expected to peak in 2024 (likely between April to August 2024).

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
On Polar Magnetic Field Reversal in Solar Cycles 21, 22, 23, and 24

Mykola I. Pishkalo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-019-1520-9

2019-08-31

Abstract:The Sun's polar magnetic fields change their polarity near the maximum of sunspot activity. We analyzed the polarity reversal epochs in Solar Cycles 21 to 24. There was a triple reversal in the N-hemisphere in Solar Cycle 24 and single reversals in the rest of cases. Epochs of the polarity reversal from measurements of the Wilcox Solar Observatory (WSO) are compared with ones when the reversals were completed in the N- and S-hemispheres. The reversal times were compared with hemispherical sunspot activity and with the Heliospheric Current Sheet (HCS) tilts, too. It was found that reversals occurred at the epoch of the sunspot activity maximum in Cycles 21 and 23, and after the corresponding maxima in Cycles 22 and 24, and one-two years after maximal HCS tilts calculated in WSO. Reversals in Solar Cycles 21, 22, 23, and 24 were completed first in the N-hemisphere and then in the S-hemisphere after 0.6, 1.1, 0.7, and 0.9 years, respectively. The polarity inversion in the near-polar latitude range \pm(55-90)^\circ occurred from 0.5 to 2.0 years earlier that the times when the reversals were completed in corresponding hemisphere. Using the maximal smoothed WSO polar field as precursor we estimated that amplitude of Solar Cycle 25 will reach 116 \pm 12 in values of smoothed monthly sunspot numbers and will be comparable with the current cycle amplitude equaled to 116.4.

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics,Space Physics
Overlapping Magnetic Activity Cycles and the Sunspot Number: Forecasting Sunspot Cycle 25 Amplitude

Scott W. McIntosh,Sandra Chapman,Robert J. Leamon,Ricky Egeland,Nicholas W. Watkins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-020-01723-y

IF: 2.961

2020-11-24

Solar Physics

Abstract:Abstract The Sun exhibits a well-observed modulation in the number of spots on its disk over a period of about 11 years. From the dawn of modern observational astronomy, sunspots have presented a challenge to understanding—their quasi-periodic variation in number, first noted 175 years ago, has stimulated community-wide interest to this day. A large number of techniques are able to explain the temporal landmarks, (geometric) shape, and amplitude of sunspot “cycles,” however, forecasting these features accurately in advance remains elusive. Recent observationally-motivated studies have illustrated a relationship between the Sun’s 22-year (Hale) magnetic cycle and the production of the sunspot cycle landmarks and patterns, but not the amplitude of the sunspot cycle. Using (discrete) Hilbert transforms on more than 270 years of (monthly) sunspot numbers we robustly identify the so-called “termination” events that mark the end of the previous 11-yr sunspot cycle, the enhancement/acceleration of the present cycle, and the end of 22-yr magnetic activity cycles. Using these we extract a relationship between the temporal spacing of terminators and the magnitude of sunspot cycles. Given this relationship and our prediction of a terminator event in 2020, we deduce that sunspot Solar Cycle 25 could have a magnitude that rivals the top few since records began. This outcome would be in stark contrast to the community consensus estimate of sunspot Solar Cycle 25 magnitude.

astronomy & astrophysics
Predicting the Timing of the Solar Cycle 25 Polar Field Reversal

Bibhuti Kumar Jha,Lisa A. Upton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad20d2

2024-02-08

The Astrophysical Journal Letters

Abstract:The process of the Sun's polar field cancellation reversal commences with the emergence of new cycle Hale's polarity active regions. Once the Sun undergoes polarity reversal, typically occurring near the peak of solar activity, it begins the process of accumulating the seed field for the forthcoming solar cycle. In recent years, the advective flux transport (AFT) model has proven highly effective in forecasting the progression of polar fields by leveraging observations of surface flows and magnetic flux emergence. In this study, we make use of the predictive capability of the AFT model to simulate the evolution of the polar fields and estimate the timing of the Solar Cycle 25 polarity reversal in both hemispheres of the Sun. We use the statistical properties of active regions along with Solar Cycle 13, which closely resembles the current solar cycle (Cycle 25), to generate synthetic active regions in order to simulate future magnetic flux emergence in AFT to predict the evolution of the polar field. Based on our simulations, we anticipate that the northern hemisphere of the Sun will undergo a polarity reversal between 2024 June and November, with the center of our distribution at 2024 August. In the southern hemisphere, we anticipate a polarity reversal between 2024 November and 2025 July, centered around 2025 February. Additionally, assuming that the reversal of the axial dipole moment coincides with the peak of the solar cycle, our findings indicate that Cycle 25 is expected to peak in 2024 (likely between 2024 April and August).

astronomy & astrophysics
Evolution of Active and Polar Photospheric Magnetic Fields During the Rise of Cycle 24 Compared to Previous Cycles

G. J. D. Petrie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-012-0117-3

IF: 2.961

2012-09-27

Solar Physics

Abstract:The evolution of the photospheric magnetic field during the declining phase and minimum of cycle 23 and the recent rise of cycle 24 are compared with the behavior during previous cycles. We used longitudinal full-disk magnetograms from the NSO’s three magnetographs at Kitt Peak, the Synoptic Optical Long-term Investigations of the Sun (SOLIS) vector spectro-magnetograph (VSM), the spectro-magnetograph and the 512-channel magnetograph instruments, and longitudinal full-disk magnetograms from the Mt. Wilson 150-foot tower. We analyzed 37 years of observations from these two observatories that have been observing daily, weather permitting, since 1974, offering an opportunity to study the evolving relationship between the active region and polar fields in some detail over several solar cycles. It is found that the annual averages of a proxy for the active region poloidal magnetic field strength, the magnetic field strength of the high-latitude poleward streams, and the time derivative of the polar field strength are all well correlated in each hemisphere. The active region net poloidal fields effectively disappeared in both hemispheres around 2004 and the polar fields have not become significantly stronger since this time. These results are based on statistically significant cyclical patterns in the active region fields and are consistent with the Babcock–Leighton phenomenological model for the solar activity cycle. There was more hemispheric asymmetry in the total and maximum active region flux during late cycle 23 (after around 2004), when the southern hemisphere was more active, and the rise of cycle 24, when the northern hemisphere was more active, than at any other time since 1974. We see evidence that the process of cycle 24 field reversal has begun at both poles.

astronomy & astrophysics
Solar Cycle Propagation, Memory, and Prediction: Insights from a Century of Magnetic Proxies

Andrés Muñoz-Jaramillo,María Dasi-Espuig,Laura A. Balmaceda,Edward E. DeLuca

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/767/2/L25

2013-04-11

Abstract:The solar cycle and its associated magnetic activity are the main drivers behind changes in the interplanetary environment and the Earth's upper atmosphere (commonly referred to as space weather). These changes have a direct impact on the lifetime of space-based assets and can create hazards to astronauts in space. In recent years there has been an effort to develop accurate solar cycle predictions (with aims at predicting the long-term evolution of space weather), leading to nearly a hundred widely spread predictions for the amplitude of solar cycle 24. A major contributor to the disagreement is the lack of direct long-term databases covering different components of the solar magnetic field (toroidal vs.\ poloidal). Here we use sunspot area and polar faculae measurements spanning a full century (as our toroidal and poloidal field proxies), to study solar cycle propagation, memory, and prediction. Our results substantiate predictions based on the polar magnetic fields, whereas we find sunspot area to be uncorrelated to cycle amplitude unless multiplied by area-weighted average tilt. This suggests that the joint assimilation of tilt and sunspot area is a better choice (with aims to cycle prediction) than sunspot area alone, and adds to the evidence in favor of active region emergence and decay as the main mechanism of poloidal field generation (i.e. the Babcock-Leighton mechanism). Finally, by looking at the correlation between our poloidal and toroidal proxies across multiple cycles, we find solar cycle memory to be limited to only one cycle.

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
Solar Cycle Precursors and the Outlook for Cycle 25

Lisa A. Upton,David H. Hathaway

2023-09-29

Abstract:Sunspot Cycle 25 over 3 years past the cycle minimum of December 2019. At this point, curve-fitting becomes reliable and consistently indicates a maximum sunspot number of 135+/-10 - slightly larger than Cycle 24's maximum of 116.4, but well below the Cycles 1-24 average of 179 (ranging from 81 for Cycle 6 to 285 for Cycle 19). A geomagnetic precursor, the minimum in the aa-index, and the Sun's magnetic precursors, the polar field strength and axial dipole moment at the time of minimum, are often used to predict the amplitude of the cycle at (or before) the onset of the cycle. We examine Cycle 25 predictions produced by these precursors. The geomagnetic precursor indicated a Cycle 25 slightly stronger than Cycle 24, with a maximum of 132+/-8. The Sun's magnetic precursors indicated that Cycle 25 would be similar to Cycle 24, with a maximum sunspot number of 120+/-10 or 114+/-15. Combining the curve-fitting results with the precursor predictions, we conclude that Cycle 25 will have a maximum smoothed sunspot number of 134+/-8 with maximum occurring late in the fall of 2024. Models for predicting the Sun's magnetic field ahead of minimum, were generally successful at predicting the polar precursors years in advance. The fact that Sun's magnetic precursors at cycle minimum were successfully predicted years before minimum and that the precursors are consistent with the size of Cycle 25 suggests that we can now more reliably predict the solar cycle.

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
Predictions for solar flares activity in solar cycle 25

Eleni Petrakou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.06545

2020-07-29

Abstract:The prediction of the evolution of individual solar cycles is a developing field, faced with divergence of forecasts even for a few years in the future. Specifically for solar flares, long-term modeling is practically absent even in rough terms. In this article a forecast for the evolution of solar cycle 25 in terms of solar flares activity is presented. It is derived from an existing phenomenological model based on the coupling of an internal solar component and a planetary component. In addition to competent temporal resolution, the predictions are characterized by features which both differentiate the model from other space climate forecasts and make it falsifiable.

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
Connection between Subsurface Layers and Surface Magnetic Activity over Multiple Solar Cycles Using GONG Observations

Mackenzie A. Baird,Sushanta C. Tripathy,Kiran Jain

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad16db

IF: 5.521

2024-02-21

The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract:We investigate the spatiotemporal evolution of high-degree acoustic-mode frequencies of the Sun and surface magnetic activity over the course of multiple solar cycles, to improve our understanding of the connection between the solar interior and atmosphere. We focus on high-degree p-modes due to their ability to characterize conditions in the shear layer just below the solar surface, and analyze 22 yr of oscillation frequencies obtained from the Global Oscillation Network Group. Considering 10.7 cm radio flux measurements, the sunspot number, and the local magnetic activity index as solar-activity proxies, we find strong correlation between the mode frequencies and each activity index. We further investigate the hemispheric asymmetry associated with oscillation frequencies and magnetic activity proxies, and find that both were dominant in the southern hemisphere during the descending phase of cycle 23, while in cycle 24 these quantities fluctuated between northern and southern hemispheres. Analyzing the frequencies at different latitudes with the progression of solar cycles, we observe that the variations at midlatitudes were dominant in the southern hemisphere during the maximum-activity period of cycle 24, but the values overlap as the cycle advances toward the minimum phase. The mode frequencies at the beginning of cycle 25 are found to be dominant in the southern hemisphere following the pattern of magnetic activity. The analysis provides added evidence that the variability in oscillation frequencies is caused by both strong and weak magnetic fields.

astronomy & astrophysics
Comparison of physics-based prediction models of solar cycle 25

Jie Jiang,Zebin Zhang,Kristóf Petrovay

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2023.106018

IF: 2.119

2023-01-25

Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics

Abstract:Physics-based solar cycle predictions provide an effective way to verify our understanding of the solar cycle. Before the start of cycle 25, several physics-based solar cycle predictions were developed. These predictions use flux transport dynamo (FTD) models, surface flux transport (SFT) models, or a combination of the two kinds of models. The common physics behind these predictions is that the surface poloidal fields around cycle minimum dominate the subsequent cycle strength. In the review, we first give short introductions to SFT and FTD models. Then we compare 7 physics-based prediction models from 4 aspects, which are what the predictor is, how to get the predictor, how to use the predictor, and what to predict. Finally, we demonstrate the large effect of assimilated magnetograms on predictions by two SFT numerical tests. We suggest that uncertainties in both initial magnetograms and sunspot emergence should be included in such physics-based predictions because of their large effects on the results. In addition, in the review we put emphasis on what we can learn from different predictions, rather than an assessment of prediction results.

meteorology & atmospheric sciences,geochemistry & geophysics

Emulating Temporal Receptive Fields of Higher Level Auditory Neurons for ASR

Prediction of sunspot and plage coverage for Solar Cycle 25

Global solar photospheric and coronal magnetic field over activity cycles 21–25

Statistical analysis and forecasting of solar wind parameters across solar cycles

Solar cycle activity: an early prediction for cycle #25

Prediction of solar activities: Sunspot numbers and solar magnetic synoptic maps

Long-term evolution of solar activity and prediction of the followingsolar cycles

What do halo CMEs tell us about solar cycle 25?

Prediction of the amplitude of solar cycle 25 from the ratio of sunspot number to sunspot-group area, low latitude activity, and 130-year solar cycle

Long-term evolution of solar activity and prediction of the following solar cycles

A Dynamo-Based Prediction of Solar Cycle 25

Predicting the Timing of the the Solar Cycle 25 Polar Field Reversal

On Polar Magnetic Field Reversal in Solar Cycles 21, 22, 23, and 24

Overlapping Magnetic Activity Cycles and the Sunspot Number: Forecasting Sunspot Cycle 25 Amplitude

Predicting the Timing of the Solar Cycle 25 Polar Field Reversal

Evolution of Active and Polar Photospheric Magnetic Fields During the Rise of Cycle 24 Compared to Previous Cycles

Solar Cycle Propagation, Memory, and Prediction: Insights from a Century of Magnetic Proxies

Solar Cycle Precursors and the Outlook for Cycle 25

Predictions for solar flares activity in solar cycle 25

Connection between Subsurface Layers and Surface Magnetic Activity over Multiple Solar Cycles Using GONG Observations

Comparison of physics-based prediction models of solar cycle 25