Abstract:Based on data collected from China Law Year Book and practice in one district in east of China from 1997 to 2007,this paper conducts an empirical study on the operation of current Chinese Criminal Procedural Law.Although there are some variations,the data from the district demonstrates all the characteristics demonstrated by China Law Year Book,that is,very low rate of non—prosecution and non— guilty decision,low percentage of defendant appeal and high rate of affirmation of original judgment in second instance trial and trial supervision procedure,which strengthens the conclusion that Chinese criminal process is decided by criminal investigation. A process decided by investigation procedure means once a case is transferred by the investigative organ to be reviewed and prosecuted,it is very likely to be convicted.Most of the first instance trial just reviews and verifies the evidence collected in the investigation procedure.Such process is different from the "trial—center" criminal procedure of western countries.Such process has some advantages,such as encouraging investigative organs to find out the truth of the case by all means and to screen out most of the suspects in the early stage of criminal process to save procedural resources and make suspects get rid of criminal proceedings earlier.However,it does have some disadvantages.It makes investigative organs under great pressures to collect guilty evidence, which would infringe the human rights of the suspects.Moreover,it also makes the public trial a "rubber stamp" to the investigation procedure and cannot revise errors made in investigation. Current judicial reform chooses trail procedure as the breakthrough,and the investigation procedure seems quiet by comparison.This approach of reform is wrong.To be successful in criminal judicial reform,we must start from investigation procedure.The reform of investigation procedure is too ambitious a topic for this paper to look into.But the decision made by the investigative organ at the end of the investigation is the turning point of criminal proceeding.Establishing effective supervision of this turning point is the key to Chinese criminal process.

Promoting Development of Criminal Procedure Law with Guiding Cases——A Discussion from the Perspective of Criminal Litigation Law

Public Cases, Authentication Opinions, and Amendments to Law of Criminal Procedure

Current status, obstacles and advice for improvement on expert assistant system

"Typical Cases" As an Informal Legal Source in the Administrative Law

A Study on Judicial Application of Guiding Cases in Mainland China - on the Basis of 118 Civil and Commercial Cases in 2017

The Formation of Precedent and the Case-guiding System in China

Review and Reflection on the Research of Criminal Procedure

How China’s Supreme People’s Court Supports the Development of Foreign-Related Rule of Law

Win Some, Lose Some: Reforms of China’s Simplified Criminal Procedure

A Theoretical Analysis of the Simultaneous Promulgation of "Two Provisions on Evidence"

On the Up-building of Criminal Pretrial Review System in China--Expectation under the Revision of the Criminal Procedure Law

The Jurisprudence of Case Guidance System

An Empirical Study on Operation of Chinese Criminal Procedure Law

Dialectical analysis of amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law of China in 2018

"Democratization" of Judicial Interpretation and the Supreme Court'S Political Function

Comprehensive Amendments to the Civil Procedure Law and Procuratorial Supervision

Controlling Criminal Procedural Violation by Criminal Procedural Sanction

Several Issues on the Reform of Criminal Procedure

The Second Thoughts on the Relation Between Placing A Case on File and Investigation

Retrospection and perspective: Chinese criminal procedure law (1979–2009)

Retrospection and Reflection on the Criminal Judicial Reform in Recent Years