Abstract:Based on data collected from China Law Year Book and practice in one district in east of China from 1997 to 2007,this paper conducts an empirical study on the operation of current Chinese Criminal Procedural Law.Although there are some variations,the data from the district demonstrates all the characteristics demonstrated by China Law Year Book,that is,very low rate of non—prosecution and non— guilty decision,low percentage of defendant appeal and high rate of affirmation of original judgment in second instance trial and trial supervision procedure,which strengthens the conclusion that Chinese criminal process is decided by criminal investigation. A process decided by investigation procedure means once a case is transferred by the investigative organ to be reviewed and prosecuted,it is very likely to be convicted.Most of the first instance trial just reviews and verifies the evidence collected in the investigation procedure.Such process is different from the "trial—center" criminal procedure of western countries.Such process has some advantages,such as encouraging investigative organs to find out the truth of the case by all means and to screen out most of the suspects in the early stage of criminal process to save procedural resources and make suspects get rid of criminal proceedings earlier.However,it does have some disadvantages.It makes investigative organs under great pressures to collect guilty evidence, which would infringe the human rights of the suspects.Moreover,it also makes the public trial a "rubber stamp" to the investigation procedure and cannot revise errors made in investigation. Current judicial reform chooses trail procedure as the breakthrough,and the investigation procedure seems quiet by comparison.This approach of reform is wrong.To be successful in criminal judicial reform,we must start from investigation procedure.The reform of investigation procedure is too ambitious a topic for this paper to look into.But the decision made by the investigative organ at the end of the investigation is the turning point of criminal proceeding.Establishing effective supervision of this turning point is the key to Chinese criminal process.

Win Some, Lose Some: Reforms of China’s Simplified Criminal Procedure

Public Opinions on Criminal Trials in China: A Comparative Study of Chinese College Students in the PRC and Hong Kong

Public Cases, Authentication Opinions, and Amendments to Law of Criminal Procedure

Reforms to China's Pretrial Detention System: the Role of the Procuratorate

Several Issues on the Reform of Criminal Procedure

Simplified Trial:Challenges and Responses in the Reform Process

An Empirical Study on Operation of Chinese Criminal Procedure Law

On the Reform of China’s Criminal Procedures for Trial Supervision

Reform of the Criminal Procedural System and the Distribution of the Procuratorial Power

Retrospection and Reflection on the Criminal Judicial Reform in Recent Years

The Retrospect and Prospect of Sentencing Procedure Reform in China

Research on the Reform of China's Public Prosecution System

The Improvement of Commutation and Parole Procedures in China

Dialectical analysis of amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law of China in 2018

Truth and procedural fairness in Chinese criminal procedure law

Something Lost, Something Gained: Changes in China’s Procuratorate in Response to the Reform of the National Supervision System

Retrospection and perspective: Chinese criminal procedure law (1979–2009)

An Analysis of Criminal Retrial Procedures in China

On the Reformation and Perfection of Criminal Trial Procedure in Criminal Procedural Law Amendment——in the View of Criminal Policy of Combination of Leniency with Strictness

On the Progress and Development of the Criminal Procedural System in China

The practical dilemma of criminal procedure in China